{"title":"The marketization of educational resources and individual choice: Examining the heterogeneous treatment effect of private tutoring in middle schools","authors":"Angran Li","doi":"10.1177/2057150X231169449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, with the rapid marketization of educational resources in K–12 education, private tutoring has become extremely popular in China, yet the previous research has not yet reached a consensus on the impact of private tutoring on academic outcomes, and has also overlooked the influence of individual choice under the exam-oriented educational system in China. By using data drawn from the China Education Panel Survey, this study examines the heterogeneous treatment effect of private tutoring on 8th graders’ academic performance from the perspective of individual choice. The results show that a propensity to attend private tutoring can differentiate the class disparities among middle school students in terms of individual, family, school, and other factors. Furthermore, the results indicate that private tutoring generally has limited impacts on academic achievement, net of all background factors. However, students whose propensity to attend private tutoring lies in the intermediate range tend to benefit the most from private tutoring. For both students from socioeconomically disadvantaged families with a low propensity and their advantaged counterparts with a high propensity, private tutoring has little effect on their academic performance. Sensitivity analysis further shows that the heterogeneous effects of private tutoring differs across cognitive ability, subject types, and tutoring periods. The finding has important implications for understanding the consequences of China's policy interventions in terms of reducing educational inequality.","PeriodicalId":37302,"journal":{"name":"社会","volume":"9 1","pages":"250 - 282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"社会","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150X231169449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent decades, with the rapid marketization of educational resources in K–12 education, private tutoring has become extremely popular in China, yet the previous research has not yet reached a consensus on the impact of private tutoring on academic outcomes, and has also overlooked the influence of individual choice under the exam-oriented educational system in China. By using data drawn from the China Education Panel Survey, this study examines the heterogeneous treatment effect of private tutoring on 8th graders’ academic performance from the perspective of individual choice. The results show that a propensity to attend private tutoring can differentiate the class disparities among middle school students in terms of individual, family, school, and other factors. Furthermore, the results indicate that private tutoring generally has limited impacts on academic achievement, net of all background factors. However, students whose propensity to attend private tutoring lies in the intermediate range tend to benefit the most from private tutoring. For both students from socioeconomically disadvantaged families with a low propensity and their advantaged counterparts with a high propensity, private tutoring has little effect on their academic performance. Sensitivity analysis further shows that the heterogeneous effects of private tutoring differs across cognitive ability, subject types, and tutoring periods. The finding has important implications for understanding the consequences of China's policy interventions in terms of reducing educational inequality.
期刊介绍:
The Chinese Journal of Sociology is a peer reviewed, international journal with the following standards: 1. The purpose of the Journal is to publish (in the English language) articles, reviews and scholarly comment which have been judged worthy of publication by appropriate specialists and accepted by the University on studies relating to sociology. 2. The Journal will be international in the sense that it will seek, wherever possible, to publish material from authors with an international reputation and articles that are of interest to an international audience. 3. In pursuit of the above the journal shall: (i) draw on and include high quality work from the international community . The Journal shall include work representing the major areas of interest in sociology. (ii) avoid bias in favour of the interests of particular schools or directions of research or particular political or narrow disciplinary objectives to the exclusion of others; (iii) ensure that articles are written in a terminology and style which makes them intelligible, not merely within the context of a particular discipline or abstract mode, but across the domain of relevant disciplines.