The Evaluation of Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetic Patients

S. Kosirova, D. Rubintova, J. Lacka, J. Klimas, T. Foltanova, I. Tůmová
{"title":"The Evaluation of Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetic Patients","authors":"S. Kosirova, D. Rubintova, J. Lacka, J. Klimas, T. Foltanova, I. Tůmová","doi":"10.2478/afpuc-2022-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract AIM The aim of the study was to evaluate cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 according to gender. METHODS The monitoring was designed as a retrospective analysis of data obtained from the documentation of the diabetic outpatients treated with the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) or sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2). Cardiovascular risk was assessed according to UKPDS risk engine. RESULTS The levels of HbA1c decreased throughout the whole study. Sixty per cent of patients achieved an HbA1c level <8% after 18 months. Both men and women had similar glycaemic compensation. Men had a significantly higher risk of fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) (p < 0.001), stroke (p < 0.01) and fatal stroke (p < 0.01) compared to women. We found the risk of fatal CHD to be 38-fold higher in men compared to women (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Potential cardiovascular effects of antidiabetic treatment should be clearly defined with possible different effects according to gender. We found a much higher risk in men than women, even when their glycaemic compensation was comparable.","PeriodicalId":12070,"journal":{"name":"European Pharmaceutical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Pharmaceutical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/afpuc-2022-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract AIM The aim of the study was to evaluate cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 according to gender. METHODS The monitoring was designed as a retrospective analysis of data obtained from the documentation of the diabetic outpatients treated with the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is) or sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2). Cardiovascular risk was assessed according to UKPDS risk engine. RESULTS The levels of HbA1c decreased throughout the whole study. Sixty per cent of patients achieved an HbA1c level <8% after 18 months. Both men and women had similar glycaemic compensation. Men had a significantly higher risk of fatal coronary heart disease (CHD) (p < 0.001), stroke (p < 0.01) and fatal stroke (p < 0.01) compared to women. We found the risk of fatal CHD to be 38-fold higher in men compared to women (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Potential cardiovascular effects of antidiabetic treatment should be clearly defined with possible different effects according to gender. We found a much higher risk in men than women, even when their glycaemic compensation was comparable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病患者心血管风险的评价
摘要目的研究2型糖尿病患者的心血管风险。方法回顾性分析二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4is)或钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2 (SGLT2)治疗的糖尿病门诊患者的资料。根据UKPDS风险引擎评估心血管风险。结果在整个研究过程中,HbA1c水平下降。60%的患者在18个月后HbA1c水平<8%。男性和女性都有相似的血糖补偿。男性患致死性冠心病(CHD) (p < 0.001)、中风(p < 0.01)和致死性中风(p < 0.01)的风险明显高于女性。我们发现男性患致命性冠心病的风险是女性的38倍(p < 0.01)。结论应明确降糖治疗的潜在心血管效应,并根据性别区分可能的不同效应。我们发现男性患糖尿病的风险比女性高得多,即使他们的血糖补偿是相当的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Pharmaceutical Journal
European Pharmaceutical Journal Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: European Pharmaceutical Journal publishes only original articles not previously published and articles that are not being considered or have not been submitted for publication elsewhere. If parts of the results have been published as conference abstract or elsewhere, it should be stated in references. The ethical standards of the Helsinki-Tokio Declaration should be kept. This should be mentioned in the Methods of manuscript. Reviews are published only on request. Authors, whose submitted research work was performed with the support of a company, should indicate this in Conflict of Interest.
期刊最新文献
Characterisation of the lipolytic enzymatic activities of fungal rizoenzymes from Rhizopus oryzae in comparison to pancreatin from pigs Physicochemical properties of tablet dosage form based on pre-gelatinized- and phosphorylated-modified starches from white-water yam (Dioscorea alata L.) Development and Characterisation of Valsartan Immediate Release Dosage Form Using Solubility Enhancement Technique Antimicrobial, Antifungal, Antioxidant Activity and Phytochemical Investigation of Phenolcarboxylic Acids by GC–MS of Raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) Shoot Lipophilic Extract Formulation development, in-vitro and ex-vivo evaluation of dry adsorbed solid lipid nanoparticles: an approach of overcoming olanzapine drawbacks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1