‘Tortoises all the way down’: Geertz, cybernetics and ‘culture’ at the end of the Cold War

IF 1.1 2区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropological Theory Pub Date : 2020-02-03 DOI:10.1177/1463499619899747
Poornima Paidipaty
{"title":"‘Tortoises all the way down’: Geertz, cybernetics and ‘culture’ at the end of the Cold War","authors":"Poornima Paidipaty","doi":"10.1177/1463499619899747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his essay ‘The Impact of the Concept of Culture on the Concept of Man’, Clifford Geertz asserts that contemporary social science must ‘look for systematic relationships among diverse phenomena’. Geertz credits his approach to developments in the field of cybernetics, which pioneered the study of modern information systems to understand everything from computer systems and biological networks to human organisation. Geertz’s early formulation of culture, as a set of publicly traded symbols and their meanings, relied on cybernetic theories of ‘control mechanisms’, as discreet, ordered instructions and operational codes. In locating Geertz and the notion of culture within the historical developments and transformation of cyborg science, this paper also seeks to understand the expansive transformation of American anthropology in the Cold War period, as it shifts from the study of primitive to complex societies in the context of America’s growing global ambitions. Repositioning Geertz in this way helps contemporary readers understand Geertzian ‘culture’ beyond the limits of the cultural turn. More crucially, it better situates current anthropological interest in contingency, ontology and emergence within a broader historical and intellectual genealogy.","PeriodicalId":51554,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Theory","volume":"20 1","pages":"129 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1463499619899747","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Theory","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499619899747","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In his essay ‘The Impact of the Concept of Culture on the Concept of Man’, Clifford Geertz asserts that contemporary social science must ‘look for systematic relationships among diverse phenomena’. Geertz credits his approach to developments in the field of cybernetics, which pioneered the study of modern information systems to understand everything from computer systems and biological networks to human organisation. Geertz’s early formulation of culture, as a set of publicly traded symbols and their meanings, relied on cybernetic theories of ‘control mechanisms’, as discreet, ordered instructions and operational codes. In locating Geertz and the notion of culture within the historical developments and transformation of cyborg science, this paper also seeks to understand the expansive transformation of American anthropology in the Cold War period, as it shifts from the study of primitive to complex societies in the context of America’s growing global ambitions. Repositioning Geertz in this way helps contemporary readers understand Geertzian ‘culture’ beyond the limits of the cultural turn. More crucially, it better situates current anthropological interest in contingency, ontology and emergence within a broader historical and intellectual genealogy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“一路向下的乌龟”:格尔茨、控制论和冷战末期的“文化”
克利福德·格尔茨在他的文章《文化概念对人的概念的影响》中断言,当代社会科学必须“在各种现象之间寻找系统的关系”。格尔茨把他的方法归功于控制论领域的发展,控制论是研究现代信息系统以理解从计算机系统、生物网络到人类组织的一切事物的先驱。格尔茨早期将文化表述为一组公开交易的符号及其含义,这一表述依赖于“控制机制”的控制论理论,即谨慎有序的指令和操作代码。在将格尔茨和文化概念置于生化人科学的历史发展和转型中,本文还试图理解冷战时期美国人类学的广泛转变,因为它在美国日益增长的全球野心的背景下,从原始社会的研究转向了复杂社会的研究。以这种方式重新定位格尔茨有助于当代读者超越文化转向的限制来理解格尔茨的“文化”。更重要的是,它更好地将当前人类学对偶然性、本体论和涌现的兴趣置于更广泛的历史和知识谱系中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropological Theory
Anthropological Theory ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Anthropological Theory is an international peer reviewed journal seeking to strengthen anthropological theorizing in different areas of the world. This is an exciting forum for new insights into theoretical issues in anthropology and more broadly, social theory. Anthropological Theory publishes articles engaging with a variety of theoretical debates in areas including: * marxism * feminism * political philosophy * historical sociology * hermeneutics * critical theory * philosophy of science * biological anthropology * archaeology
期刊最新文献
Improvisation, collective structure, and culture change: A theory of bricolage What kinship is and is not in the work of Marshall Sahlins … and beyond In search of decolonised political futures: Engaging Mahmood Mamdani's neither settler nor native Justice and reconciliation: Responses to critics in Anthropological Theory Surviving colonialism? A response to Neither Settler nor Native
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1