The bright side of CEO narcissism and its impact on accounting conservatism

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting Literature Pub Date : 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1108/jal-01-2023-0006
Yun Shen, Vito Mollica, Aldo Fortunato Dalla Costa
{"title":"The bright side of CEO narcissism and its impact on accounting conservatism","authors":"Yun Shen, Vito Mollica, Aldo Fortunato Dalla Costa","doi":"10.1108/jal-01-2023-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study sheds new light on the personality trait and provides evidence regarding the relation between narcissism and desirable accounting practices, specifically the impact of CEO narcissism on accounting conservatism.Design/methodology/approachThe authors test the relation between CEO narcissism and accounting conservatism for a sample of 907 US companies and their corresponding CEOs for the period between 2010 and 2018. The authors apply three established models of accounting conservatism and measure executives' narcissism using a non-intrusive approach ubiquitous in the literature.FindingsThe authors find that CEO narcissism is associated with speculative accounting practices in the form of timely recognition of positive news and more prudent financial reporting of anticipated negative news. The authors provide the first empirical evidence that, despite its well-known negative effects on corporate financial reporting, executive narcissism can also produce positive outcomes.Originality/valueWhile managerial overconfidence has received much attention, the effects of executives' narcissism are still widely unexplored (Chatterjee and Hambrick, 2007). The authors thus contribute to the literature by investigating the relationship between CEOs' narcissism and accounting conservatism. The authors conjecture CEO narcissism should have a twofold effect on prudent financial reporting. On the one hand, CEOs' narcissism should be associated with low levels of unconditional conservatism due to excessively fast good news recognition. On the other hand, narcissistic executives should be associated with early recognition of negative news and hence with higher levels of conditional conservatism.","PeriodicalId":45666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Literature","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jal-01-2023-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study sheds new light on the personality trait and provides evidence regarding the relation between narcissism and desirable accounting practices, specifically the impact of CEO narcissism on accounting conservatism.Design/methodology/approachThe authors test the relation between CEO narcissism and accounting conservatism for a sample of 907 US companies and their corresponding CEOs for the period between 2010 and 2018. The authors apply three established models of accounting conservatism and measure executives' narcissism using a non-intrusive approach ubiquitous in the literature.FindingsThe authors find that CEO narcissism is associated with speculative accounting practices in the form of timely recognition of positive news and more prudent financial reporting of anticipated negative news. The authors provide the first empirical evidence that, despite its well-known negative effects on corporate financial reporting, executive narcissism can also produce positive outcomes.Originality/valueWhile managerial overconfidence has received much attention, the effects of executives' narcissism are still widely unexplored (Chatterjee and Hambrick, 2007). The authors thus contribute to the literature by investigating the relationship between CEOs' narcissism and accounting conservatism. The authors conjecture CEO narcissism should have a twofold effect on prudent financial reporting. On the one hand, CEOs' narcissism should be associated with low levels of unconditional conservatism due to excessively fast good news recognition. On the other hand, narcissistic executives should be associated with early recognition of negative news and hence with higher levels of conditional conservatism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CEO自恋的光明面及其对会计保守主义的影响
目的本研究为自恋与理想会计实践之间的关系,特别是CEO自恋对会计稳健性的影响提供了证据。设计/方法论/方法作者在2010年至2018年期间,对907家美国公司及其相应的首席执行官进行了抽样,测试了首席执行官自恋与会计保守主义之间的关系。作者应用了三个已建立的会计稳健性模型,并使用文献中普遍存在的非侵入性方法来衡量高管的自恋。研究结果:作者发现,首席执行官自恋与投机会计行为有关,其形式是及时确认正面消息,并对预期负面消息进行更谨慎的财务报告。作者提供了第一个实证证据,证明尽管高管自恋对公司财务报告产生了众所周知的负面影响,但它也会产生积极的结果。独创性/价值尽管管理层的过度自信受到了广泛关注,但高管自恋的影响仍未得到广泛探索(Chatterjee和Hambrick,2007)。因此,作者通过调查CEO自恋与会计保守主义之间的关系,为文献做出了贡献。作者推测首席执行官自恋应该对谨慎的财务报告产生双重影响。一方面,CEO们的自恋应该与低水平的无条件保守主义联系在一起,因为他们对好消息的认可速度过快。另一方面,自恋型高管应该与对负面新闻的早期认识联系在一起,从而与更高水平的条件保守主义联系在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal is to publish papers that make a fundamental and substantial contribution to the understanding of accounting phenomena. To this end, the Journal intends to publish papers that (1) synthesize an area of research in a concise and rigorous manner to assist academics and others to gain knowledge and appreciation of diverse research areas or (2) present high quality, multi-method, original research on a broad range of topics relevant to accounting, auditing and taxation. Topical coverage is broad and inclusive covering virtually all aspects of accounting. Consistent with the historical mission of the Journal, it is expected that the lead article of each issue will be a synthesis article on an important research topic. Other manuscripts to be included in a given issue will be a mix of synthesis and original research papers. In addition to traditional research topics and methods, we actively solicit manuscripts of the including, but not limited to, the following: • meta-analyses • field studies • critiques of papers published in other journals • emerging developments in accounting theory • commentaries on current issues • innovative experimental research with strong grounding in cognitive, social or anthropological sciences • creative archival analyses using non-standard methodologies or data sources with strong grounding in various social sciences • book reviews • "idea" papers that don''t fit into other established categories.
期刊最新文献
Ontological basis of the creative accounting phenomenon as a financial misstatement The valuation and determinants of franking account balances Unveiling the hidden symphony: board dynamics and carbon emission disclosure – a meta-analysis study in the realm of developed markets Trade-based money laundering: a systematic literature review Theories underlying environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: a systematic review of accounting studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1