Three dimensional analyses of geocell reinforced encased stone column supported embankments on lithomargic clay

Vibhoosha M P, A. Bhasi, S. Nayak
{"title":"Three dimensional analyses of geocell reinforced encased stone column supported embankments on lithomargic clay","authors":"Vibhoosha M P, A. Bhasi, S. Nayak","doi":"10.1080/17486025.2022.2079154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Geocells are a superior form of reinforcement due to their cost-effectiveness and three-dimensional confining properties. However, numerical modeling of geocell is always challenging due to its three-dimensional honeycomb structure. The limitations of the equivalent composite approach (ECA) led to the recent development of full 3D numerical models, which consider geocell-infill material interaction. This paper discusses the time-dependent performance of geocell-reinforced encased stone column-supported embankment considering the actual 3D nature of geocells using the finite element program ABAQUS. Parametric studies were carried out to study the stress transfer mechanism, vertical deformation of the foundation soil, and stress-strain variation inside the geocell pockets. It is found from the analyses that with the provision of a geocell layer on top of Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns (GESC), the stress concentration ratio improved by 47% at the end of consolidation compared to GESC alone. Also, an 80% reduction in foundation surface settlement is observed with geocell-sand mattresses. The geocell-sand mattress decreased the bulging of the stone columns, and almost 80% of the stone column bulging occurred by the end of the embankment construction. The proposed model’s numerical results show that the equivalent composite approach overestimated the stress concentration ratio and bearing capacity. The tensile stresses are non-uniformly distributed in the geocell pockets, and the maximum tensile force was mobilised at the geocell mid-height. Among the various geocell infill materials analysed, the aggregates were best suited considering the stress concentration ratio and vertical settlement. The numerical results supported the idea that encased stone columns with geocells at the embankment base can perform similarly to a geosynthetic reinforced piled embankment system, which is costlier but very efficient. When the modular ratio is more than 40, geocell-reinforced encased stone column-supported embankment is similar to GRPES.","PeriodicalId":46470,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics and Geoengineering-An International Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"458 - 476"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics and Geoengineering-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2022.2079154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Geocells are a superior form of reinforcement due to their cost-effectiveness and three-dimensional confining properties. However, numerical modeling of geocell is always challenging due to its three-dimensional honeycomb structure. The limitations of the equivalent composite approach (ECA) led to the recent development of full 3D numerical models, which consider geocell-infill material interaction. This paper discusses the time-dependent performance of geocell-reinforced encased stone column-supported embankment considering the actual 3D nature of geocells using the finite element program ABAQUS. Parametric studies were carried out to study the stress transfer mechanism, vertical deformation of the foundation soil, and stress-strain variation inside the geocell pockets. It is found from the analyses that with the provision of a geocell layer on top of Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns (GESC), the stress concentration ratio improved by 47% at the end of consolidation compared to GESC alone. Also, an 80% reduction in foundation surface settlement is observed with geocell-sand mattresses. The geocell-sand mattress decreased the bulging of the stone columns, and almost 80% of the stone column bulging occurred by the end of the embankment construction. The proposed model’s numerical results show that the equivalent composite approach overestimated the stress concentration ratio and bearing capacity. The tensile stresses are non-uniformly distributed in the geocell pockets, and the maximum tensile force was mobilised at the geocell mid-height. Among the various geocell infill materials analysed, the aggregates were best suited considering the stress concentration ratio and vertical settlement. The numerical results supported the idea that encased stone columns with geocells at the embankment base can perform similarly to a geosynthetic reinforced piled embankment system, which is costlier but very efficient. When the modular ratio is more than 40, geocell-reinforced encased stone column-supported embankment is similar to GRPES.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
石质粘土土格室加筋包石柱支撑路堤的三维分析
土工格室由于其成本效益和三维约束特性是一种优越的加固形式。然而,土工格室的三维蜂窝结构使其数值模拟一直具有挑战性。等效复合方法(ECA)的局限性导致了最近考虑土工格室-填充材料相互作用的全三维数值模型的发展。本文利用ABAQUS有限元程序,考虑土工格室的实际三维性质,讨论了土工格室加筋包涵石柱支撑路堤的时变性能。通过参数化研究,研究了土工格室袋内的应力传递机制、地基土的竖向变形和应力-应变变化。分析发现,在土工合成包裹石柱(GESC)顶部设置土工格室层,固结结束时的应力集中比单独设置GESC提高了47%。此外,土工格室-砂垫可减少80%的地基表面沉降。土工格室-砂垫层减少了石柱的胀形,近80%的石柱胀形发生在路堤施工结束时。数值结果表明,等效复合方法高估了应力集中比和承载力。拉伸应力在土工格室口袋中分布不均匀,最大拉伸力在土工格室中部高度调动。在各种土工格室填充材料中,考虑到应力集中比和竖向沉降,骨料是最合适的。数值计算结果支持了这样的观点,即在路基底部装有土工格室的包裹石柱可以实现与土工合成材料加筋桩路基系统相似的性能,这种系统成本更高,但效率很高。当模比大于40时,土工格室加筋包石柱支撑路堤与GRPES相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Geomechanics is concerned with the application of the principle of mechanics to earth-materials (namely geo-material). Geoengineering covers a wide range of engineering disciplines related to geo-materials, such as foundation engineering, slope engineering, tunnelling, rock engineering, engineering geology and geo-environmental engineering. Geomechanics and Geoengineering is a major publication channel for research in the areas of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical and geological engineering, engineering geology, geo-environmental engineering and all geo-material related engineering and science disciplines. The Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of innovative ideas, especially between researchers in Asia and the rest of the world.
期刊最新文献
Analytical evaluation of partially stiffened granular piled raft with the effect of rigidity of bearing stratum A parametric study on deformation behaviour for design of braced excavation in soft clay Effect of leachate and used motor oil on the geotechnical and mechanical characteristics of soils with different mineralogy under different moisture conditions Influence of edge distance on experimental p-y curves for piles near slope Performance of loosely skirted square footing resting on reinforced sand under vertical concentric and eccentric loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1