API Equation Design Limits Plot for Ellipse and Circle of Plasticity

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM SPE Drilling & Completion Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.2118/204079-PA
J. Romero, J. Aasen
{"title":"API Equation Design Limits Plot for Ellipse and Circle of Plasticity","authors":"J. Romero, J. Aasen","doi":"10.2118/204079-PA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper we present a methodology to superimpose the American Petroleum Institute (API) uniaxial and triaxial limits on tubular design limits plots (API TR 5C3 2018). Complications caused by a recent change of axis are resolved, producing a practical design limits plot that avoids the horizontal shift of the API vertical limits, which is currently the industry standard. The commonly used slanted ellipse is compared against an adaptation of the circle of plasticity in the form of a horizontal ellipse, showing the convenience of this last one with examples.\n After the current official collapse formulation was made part of the main body of standard API TR 5C3 (2018), the horizontal axis on the standard industry well tubular design limits plot changed. The present study evaluates this redefinition of the horizontal axis. One consequence of this modification is a difficulty plotting the API tension and compression limits. The API horizontal limits (uniaxial burst and collapse) are found to be independent of load situation, whereas the API vertical design limits (uniaxial tension and compression) are dependent on inside and outside tubular pressures. The approaches used by commercial software and industry publications to solve this challenge are reviewed. A new design methodology is developed to link API uniaxial limits to the triaxial theory.\n One main objective of the study is to establish a mathematical relationship between API tubular design limits and the von Mises triaxial theory (API TR 5C3 2018). A methodology that allows plotting the API uniaxial force limits on the design limits plot is developed. The study also shows that the results obtained from the industry standard slanted ellipse are identical to those obtained from the horizontal ellipse and circle. One important difference is that the slanted ellipse is based on the zero axial stress datum, whereas the horizontal ellipse/circle uses the neutral axial stress datum. The horizontal ellipse/circle is well suited for calculations involving buckling, compatible with the information used in field operations, and its formulations are less complicated than the tilted ellipse. Therefore, attention is called to the use of the horizontal ellipse/circle in well tubular design.","PeriodicalId":51165,"journal":{"name":"SPE Drilling & Completion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPE Drilling & Completion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204079-PA","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, PETROLEUM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we present a methodology to superimpose the American Petroleum Institute (API) uniaxial and triaxial limits on tubular design limits plots (API TR 5C3 2018). Complications caused by a recent change of axis are resolved, producing a practical design limits plot that avoids the horizontal shift of the API vertical limits, which is currently the industry standard. The commonly used slanted ellipse is compared against an adaptation of the circle of plasticity in the form of a horizontal ellipse, showing the convenience of this last one with examples. After the current official collapse formulation was made part of the main body of standard API TR 5C3 (2018), the horizontal axis on the standard industry well tubular design limits plot changed. The present study evaluates this redefinition of the horizontal axis. One consequence of this modification is a difficulty plotting the API tension and compression limits. The API horizontal limits (uniaxial burst and collapse) are found to be independent of load situation, whereas the API vertical design limits (uniaxial tension and compression) are dependent on inside and outside tubular pressures. The approaches used by commercial software and industry publications to solve this challenge are reviewed. A new design methodology is developed to link API uniaxial limits to the triaxial theory. One main objective of the study is to establish a mathematical relationship between API tubular design limits and the von Mises triaxial theory (API TR 5C3 2018). A methodology that allows plotting the API uniaxial force limits on the design limits plot is developed. The study also shows that the results obtained from the industry standard slanted ellipse are identical to those obtained from the horizontal ellipse and circle. One important difference is that the slanted ellipse is based on the zero axial stress datum, whereas the horizontal ellipse/circle uses the neutral axial stress datum. The horizontal ellipse/circle is well suited for calculations involving buckling, compatible with the information used in field operations, and its formulations are less complicated than the tilted ellipse. Therefore, attention is called to the use of the horizontal ellipse/circle in well tubular design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
塑性椭圆和圆的API方程设计极限图
在本文中,我们提出了一种方法,将美国石油协会(API)的单轴和三轴极限叠加到管状设计极限图上(API TR 5C3 2018)。解决了最近轴线变化引起的复杂性,产生了一个实用的设计极限图,避免了API垂直极限的水平移动,这是目前的行业标准。将常用的斜椭圆与塑性圆在水平椭圆形式下的适应性进行了比较,并举例说明了后一种形式的便利性。在现行官方坍塌配方成为标准API TR 5C3(2018)主体的一部分后,标准工业井管柱设计限值图上的水平轴发生了变化。本研究评估了这种对横轴的重新定义。这种修改的一个后果是难以绘制API的张力和压缩极限。研究发现,API水平极限(单轴爆裂和坍塌)与载荷情况无关,而API垂直设计极限(单轴拉伸和压缩)取决于管内和管外压力。本文回顾了商业软件和工业出版物用于解决这一挑战的方法。开发了一种新的设计方法,将API单轴极限与三轴理论联系起来。该研究的一个主要目标是建立API管设计极限与von Mises三轴理论(API TR 5C3 2018)之间的数学关系。开发了一种允许在设计极限图上绘制API单轴力极限的方法。研究还表明,用工业标准斜椭圆得到的结果与用水平椭圆和圆形得到的结果是一致的。一个重要的区别是,倾斜椭圆是基于零轴向应力基准,而水平椭圆/圆使用中性轴向应力基准。水平椭圆/圆非常适合计算屈曲,与现场作业中使用的信息兼容,其公式比倾斜椭圆更简单。因此,在井管柱设计中应注意水平椭圆/圆形的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SPE Drilling & Completion
SPE Drilling & Completion 工程技术-工程:石油
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Covers horizontal and directional drilling, drilling fluids, bit technology, sand control, perforating, cementing, well control, completions and drilling operations.
期刊最新文献
Combining Magnetic and Gyroscopic Surveys Provides the Best Possible Accuracy Applications of Machine Learning Methods to Predict Hole Cleaning in Horizontal and Highly Deviated Wells Experimental Investigation of Geopolymers for Application in High-Temperature and Geothermal Well Cementing Analysis of Riser Gas Pressure from Full-Scale Gas-in-Riser Experiments with Instrumentation Correlating Surface and Downhole Perforation Entry Hole Measurements Leads to Development of Improved Perforating Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1