The innovation challenge in micro and small enterprises (MSE)

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Innovation & Management Review Pub Date : 2019-08-28 DOI:10.1108/inmr-03-2019-0031
Davi de França Berne, R. Coda, Patricia Krakauer, Denis Donaire
{"title":"The innovation challenge in micro and small enterprises (MSE)","authors":"Davi de França Berne, R. Coda, Patricia Krakauer, Denis Donaire","doi":"10.1108/inmr-03-2019-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to measure the degree of innovation of micro and small industrial companies in the West and Southwest metropolitan regions of the city of São Paulo, through a survey with 203 firms in the metallurgy sector.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research had a quantitative and descriptive focus and used as methodology the validated and international approach known as Innovation Radar.\n\n\nFindings\nThe degree of innovation in these micro and small companies is low; thus, the authors could not characterize them as systemic innovators. Most of them are little innovative, although some were classified as occasional innovators. The dimensions organization, processes, presence, supply chain and added value were the least developed.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nTo carry out similar studies in other Brazilian regions, to compare results and draw new conclusions, or even check if the degree of innovation present in micro-firms of these regions would not be even lower; to monitor the evolution of companies through a longitudinal study, to detect improvements in the degree of innovation; and to conduct a qualitative research that can deepen questions on the results of our study, such as the reasons why this type of company does not adopt innovative practices, or even the real suitability of the Innovation Radar model for micro and small enterprises (MSEs). We observed that some dimensions proved to be too sophisticated for these companies, such as R&D investments and the adoption of technological advances.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study shows that the degree of innovation measured by the Innovation Radar is a useful and initial measure to check an innovative attitude in micro and small companies. It can also drive the actions that should be prioritized to stimulate the culture of innovation in SME. However, it does not allow to answer why this type of organization does not adopt innovative practices as a management attitude. Regarding its contribution, the authors expect that the paper may bring an awareness of managers and owners of micro and small companies for the need to foster innovative practices that can help increase the competitiveness and survival of this type of organization.\n\n\nSocial implications\nIn Brazil, despite the fact that MSEs represent 98 per cent of the existing companies, and are mainly responsible for job creation, their leaders have a low concern for innovative practices.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study contributes to identify the degree of innovation of these firms, which comprise a representative and strategic segment of the city’s economy, by checking to what extent an innovative attitude is effectively present in this sector. The theoretical contribution of this study regards the appropriateness of mechanisms or methodologies created to measure the degree of innovation in large organizations. Dimensions such as technological platform, brand, innovative ambience, degree of organization or systematization of processes, which are frequently considered for companies in general, and especially for large ones, are not sufficient or, instead, too sophisticated to allow an effective measurement of the degree of innovation in MSE. Thus, this study provides information for designing more effective ways to evaluate the degree of innovation that take into account MSE’s specificities, which can be considered innovation efforts, such as simple process improvements, professional development of teams, and actions to seize ideas and opportunities, among others.\n","PeriodicalId":42220,"journal":{"name":"Innovation & Management Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/inmr-03-2019-0031","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/inmr-03-2019-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to measure the degree of innovation of micro and small industrial companies in the West and Southwest metropolitan regions of the city of São Paulo, through a survey with 203 firms in the metallurgy sector. Design/methodology/approach The research had a quantitative and descriptive focus and used as methodology the validated and international approach known as Innovation Radar. Findings The degree of innovation in these micro and small companies is low; thus, the authors could not characterize them as systemic innovators. Most of them are little innovative, although some were classified as occasional innovators. The dimensions organization, processes, presence, supply chain and added value were the least developed. Research limitations/implications To carry out similar studies in other Brazilian regions, to compare results and draw new conclusions, or even check if the degree of innovation present in micro-firms of these regions would not be even lower; to monitor the evolution of companies through a longitudinal study, to detect improvements in the degree of innovation; and to conduct a qualitative research that can deepen questions on the results of our study, such as the reasons why this type of company does not adopt innovative practices, or even the real suitability of the Innovation Radar model for micro and small enterprises (MSEs). We observed that some dimensions proved to be too sophisticated for these companies, such as R&D investments and the adoption of technological advances. Practical implications The study shows that the degree of innovation measured by the Innovation Radar is a useful and initial measure to check an innovative attitude in micro and small companies. It can also drive the actions that should be prioritized to stimulate the culture of innovation in SME. However, it does not allow to answer why this type of organization does not adopt innovative practices as a management attitude. Regarding its contribution, the authors expect that the paper may bring an awareness of managers and owners of micro and small companies for the need to foster innovative practices that can help increase the competitiveness and survival of this type of organization. Social implications In Brazil, despite the fact that MSEs represent 98 per cent of the existing companies, and are mainly responsible for job creation, their leaders have a low concern for innovative practices. Originality/value The study contributes to identify the degree of innovation of these firms, which comprise a representative and strategic segment of the city’s economy, by checking to what extent an innovative attitude is effectively present in this sector. The theoretical contribution of this study regards the appropriateness of mechanisms or methodologies created to measure the degree of innovation in large organizations. Dimensions such as technological platform, brand, innovative ambience, degree of organization or systematization of processes, which are frequently considered for companies in general, and especially for large ones, are not sufficient or, instead, too sophisticated to allow an effective measurement of the degree of innovation in MSE. Thus, this study provides information for designing more effective ways to evaluate the degree of innovation that take into account MSE’s specificities, which can be considered innovation efforts, such as simple process improvements, professional development of teams, and actions to seize ideas and opportunities, among others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小微企业的创新挑战
本研究旨在通过对冶金行业203家公司的调查,衡量圣保罗市西部和西南大都市区微型和小型工业公司的创新程度。设计/方法/方法该研究以定量和描述性为重点,并使用了被称为创新雷达的经过验证的国际方法作为方法。研究发现:中小微企业的创新程度较低;因此,作者不能将他们描述为系统创新者。他们中的大多数人几乎没有创新,尽管有些人被归类为偶尔的创新者。组织、流程、存在、供应链和附加价值四个维度发展最差。在巴西其他地区进行类似的研究,比较结果并得出新的结论,甚至检查这些地区微型企业的创新程度是否会更低;通过纵向研究监测公司的演变,发现创新程度的改善;并进行定性研究,以加深对我们研究结果的疑问,例如这类公司不采用创新实践的原因,甚至创新雷达模型对微型和小型企业(mse)的真正适用性。我们观察到,对于这些公司来说,某些维度被证明过于复杂,比如研发投资和技术进步的采用。实践意义研究表明,创新雷达测量的创新程度是检验中小微企业创新态度的有用的初步指标。它还可以推动应优先采取的行动,以激发中小企业的创新文化。然而,它不允许回答为什么这种类型的组织不采用创新实践作为一种管理态度。关于它的贡献,作者期望这篇论文可以使微型和小型公司的管理者和所有者意识到需要促进创新实践,这有助于提高这类组织的竞争力和生存。在巴西,尽管中小企业占现有企业的98%,主要负责创造就业机会,但它们的领导者对创新实践的关注程度很低。独创性/价值该研究通过检查创新态度在该部门有效存在的程度,有助于确定这些公司的创新程度,这些公司构成了城市经济的代表性和战略性部分。本研究的理论贡献在于衡量大型组织创新程度的机制或方法的适当性。诸如技术平台、品牌、创新氛围、流程的组织或系统化程度等维度,通常被认为是一般公司,特别是大型公司,是不够的,或者,相反,过于复杂,无法有效地衡量MSE的创新程度。因此,本研究为设计更有效的方法来评估考虑到MSE特殊性的创新程度提供了信息,这些特殊性可以被视为创新努力,例如简单的流程改进,团队的专业发展,以及抓住想法和机会的行动等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
The nexus between management control systems, firm performance, green innovation and social media networking in Indonesian real estate companies Does eco-innovation lead to company growth? Dynamics of actors in innovation ecosystems' analytical structures Technological adoption: the case of PIX in Brazil HR innovation through inter-organizational HR collaboration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1