Morphological Change during Rapid Population Expansion Confounds Leopard Frog Identifications in the Southwestern United States

IF 2.6 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Copeia Pub Date : 2020-05-08 DOI:10.1643/CH-19-222
Gregory B. Pauly, Maya C. Shaulsky, A. J. Barley, Stevie R. Kennedy‐Gold, Sam C. Stewart, S. Keeney, R. C. Thomson
{"title":"Morphological Change during Rapid Population Expansion Confounds Leopard Frog Identifications in the Southwestern United States","authors":"Gregory B. Pauly, Maya C. Shaulsky, A. J. Barley, Stevie R. Kennedy‐Gold, Sam C. Stewart, S. Keeney, R. C. Thomson","doi":"10.1643/CH-19-222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lowland Leopard Frogs (Rana yavapaiensis) have experienced extensive population declines over the last century. In California, this species was historically known to occur in scattered localities in the extreme southeastern portion of the state, but it has not been positively documented since 1965. Subsequent to this decline in California, nonnative Rio Grande Leopard Frogs (R. berlandieri) have expanded into localities previously occupied by R. yavapaiensis. The lack of extensive formal surveys and the difficulty distinguishing between these species using morphological characters have caused uncertainty about whether Lowland Leopard Frogs persist within their historical range in California. Recently, leopard frogs that could not be confidently identified to species have been observed at historical localities of R. yavapaiensis . Thus, we undertook a formal study of these populations to characterize their morphological and genetic variation, and conclusively determine to which species they belong. Our genetic analyses demonstrate that these frogs are R. berlandieri, but the morphological characters typically used to diagnose these species are largely overlapping. Further complicating field identifications, for some morphological characters, the California R. berlandieri are more similar to R. yavapaiensis than to native-range R. berlandieri. Additionally, invasive R. berlandieri show greater variation in a key character—the condition of the inset dorsolateral folds—than that found across much of the species' native range. These results demonstrate the potential for morphological change during rapid population expansions to confound species identifications. Our findings have implications for future efforts to resolve the status of R. yavapaiensis in California and to identify other native leopard frogs found within the expanding range of R. berlandieri. Our results also highlight the utility of genetic approaches for reliably identifying morphologically similar leopard frogs.","PeriodicalId":10701,"journal":{"name":"Copeia","volume":"108 1","pages":"299 - 308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Copeia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1643/CH-19-222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Lowland Leopard Frogs (Rana yavapaiensis) have experienced extensive population declines over the last century. In California, this species was historically known to occur in scattered localities in the extreme southeastern portion of the state, but it has not been positively documented since 1965. Subsequent to this decline in California, nonnative Rio Grande Leopard Frogs (R. berlandieri) have expanded into localities previously occupied by R. yavapaiensis. The lack of extensive formal surveys and the difficulty distinguishing between these species using morphological characters have caused uncertainty about whether Lowland Leopard Frogs persist within their historical range in California. Recently, leopard frogs that could not be confidently identified to species have been observed at historical localities of R. yavapaiensis . Thus, we undertook a formal study of these populations to characterize their morphological and genetic variation, and conclusively determine to which species they belong. Our genetic analyses demonstrate that these frogs are R. berlandieri, but the morphological characters typically used to diagnose these species are largely overlapping. Further complicating field identifications, for some morphological characters, the California R. berlandieri are more similar to R. yavapaiensis than to native-range R. berlandieri. Additionally, invasive R. berlandieri show greater variation in a key character—the condition of the inset dorsolateral folds—than that found across much of the species' native range. These results demonstrate the potential for morphological change during rapid population expansions to confound species identifications. Our findings have implications for future efforts to resolve the status of R. yavapaiensis in California and to identify other native leopard frogs found within the expanding range of R. berlandieri. Our results also highlight the utility of genetic approaches for reliably identifying morphologically similar leopard frogs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国西南部,快速种群扩张期间的形态变化混淆了豹蛙的识别
低地豹蛙(Rana yavapaiensis)在上个世纪经历了大量的数量下降。在加州,这个物种在历史上被认为出现在该州东南部的分散地区,但自1965年以来就没有确切的记录。继加利福尼亚的这种下降之后,非本地的里约热内卢大豹蛙(r.b erlandieri)已经扩展到以前由r.a vapaiensis占据的地方。由于缺乏广泛的正式调查,以及使用形态特征区分这些物种的困难,导致了低地豹蛙是否在加利福尼亚州的历史范围内持续存在的不确定性。近年来,在亚瓦帕伊氏蛙的历史地点发现了一些不能确定为物种的豹蛙。因此,我们对这些种群进行了正式的研究,以表征它们的形态和遗传变异,并最终确定它们属于哪个物种。我们的遗传分析表明,这些青蛙是R. berlandieri,但通常用于诊断这些物种的形态学特征在很大程度上是重叠的。进一步复杂的野外鉴定,在某些形态特征上,加利福尼亚白僵鼠与亚瓦帕依鼠比与本地白僵鼠更相似。此外,在一个关键特征上,与该物种的大部分原生范围相比,入侵的伯兰氏r.b landdieri在插入背外侧褶皱的条件上表现出更大的变化。这些结果表明,在种群快速扩张过程中,形态变化可能会混淆物种鉴定。我们的研究结果对未来解决R. yavapaiensis在加利福尼亚的地位以及识别在R. berlandieri范围内发现的其他本地豹蛙具有重要意义。我们的研究结果还强调了遗传方法在可靠地识别形态相似的豹蛙方面的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Copeia
Copeia 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1913, Copeia is a highly respected international journal dedicated to the publication of high quality, original research papers on the behavior, conservation, ecology, genetics, morphology, evolution, physiology, systematics and taxonomy of extant and extinct fishes, amphibians, and reptiles. Copeia is published electronically and is available through BioOne. Articles are published online first, and print issues appear four times per year. In addition to research articles, Copeia publishes invited review papers, book reviews, and compiles virtual issues on topics of interest drawn from papers previously published in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Summary of the Meetings Food allergy: History, definitions and treatment approaches. The Impact of the First COVID-19 Lockdown Period on the Inpatient and Outpatient Volume of a University Based Tertiary Referral Center with Corneal Subspecialization in Germany. ASD/OCD-Linked Protocadherin-10 Regulates Synapse, But Not Axon, Development in the Amygdala and Contributes to Fear- and Anxiety-Related Behaviors. Reply to correspondence of Martin et al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1