Microbial diversity in water and animal faeces: a metagenomic analysis to assess public health risk

IF 0.9 4区 生物学 Q3 ZOOLOGY New Zealand Journal of Zoology Pub Date : 2020-10-25 DOI:10.1080/03014223.2020.1831556
Bernard J. Phiri, D. Hayman, P. Biggs, N. French, J. C. Garcia-R
{"title":"Microbial diversity in water and animal faeces: a metagenomic analysis to assess public health risk","authors":"Bernard J. Phiri, D. Hayman, P. Biggs, N. French, J. C. Garcia-R","doi":"10.1080/03014223.2020.1831556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Environmental DNA (eDNA) offers a new avenue for investigating changes in the water microbial community associated with faecal contamination. Faeces in drinking water might include pathogens, which result in serious waterborne diseases in humans. Therefore, drinking water requires comprehensive information about microbial diversity that comes from faecal contamination of different sources to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal diseases. Here, we investigated the microbial diversity of water and faecal samples at 15 recreational campgrounds in New Zealand. In total, 42 faecal (two rabbits, seven ducks, seven ruminants, seven passerines, nine possum and ten Pukeko) and 75 water (37 intakes and 38 taps) samples were analysed using 16S rRNA metabarcoding. Our results suggested that water samples harbour a higher microbial diversity than faeces. Canonical correspondence analysis of bacterial communities and NeighborNet tree of recognised pathogens showed clustering of samples from similar sources. Phylogenetic analyses showed evidence for the presence of Arcobacter and Sulfurospirillum and indicator organisms Escherichia and enterococci in water, while Campylobacter was mainly found in faeces. These findings provide novel insights toward understanding the quality of drinking water and allow future use for the identification of faecal contamination in water.","PeriodicalId":19208,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Journal of Zoology","volume":"48 1","pages":"188 - 201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03014223.2020.1831556","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2020.1831556","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Environmental DNA (eDNA) offers a new avenue for investigating changes in the water microbial community associated with faecal contamination. Faeces in drinking water might include pathogens, which result in serious waterborne diseases in humans. Therefore, drinking water requires comprehensive information about microbial diversity that comes from faecal contamination of different sources to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal diseases. Here, we investigated the microbial diversity of water and faecal samples at 15 recreational campgrounds in New Zealand. In total, 42 faecal (two rabbits, seven ducks, seven ruminants, seven passerines, nine possum and ten Pukeko) and 75 water (37 intakes and 38 taps) samples were analysed using 16S rRNA metabarcoding. Our results suggested that water samples harbour a higher microbial diversity than faeces. Canonical correspondence analysis of bacterial communities and NeighborNet tree of recognised pathogens showed clustering of samples from similar sources. Phylogenetic analyses showed evidence for the presence of Arcobacter and Sulfurospirillum and indicator organisms Escherichia and enterococci in water, while Campylobacter was mainly found in faeces. These findings provide novel insights toward understanding the quality of drinking water and allow future use for the identification of faecal contamination in water.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
水和动物粪便中的微生物多样性:评估公共卫生风险的宏基因组分析
环境DNA (Environmental DNA, eDNA)为研究与粪便污染相关的水体微生物群落变化提供了新的途径。饮用水中的粪便可能含有病原体,从而导致严重的水传播疾病。因此,饮用水需要有关来自不同来源的粪便污染的微生物多样性的综合信息,以降低胃肠道疾病的风险。在这里,我们调查了新西兰15个休闲露营地的水和粪便样本的微生物多样性。采用16S rRNA元条形码技术分析了42份粪便(2只兔子、7只鸭子、7只反刍动物、7只雀形目动物、9只负鼠和10只白狐)和75份水(37份取水和38份取水)样本。我们的研究结果表明,水样比粪便具有更高的微生物多样性。细菌群落的典型对应分析和识别病原体的NeighborNet树显示来自相似来源的样本聚类。系统发育分析表明,水体中存在Arcobacter和Sulfurospirillum以及指示生物Escherichia和enterococci,而弯曲杆菌主要存在于粪便中。这些发现为了解饮用水质量提供了新的见解,并允许未来用于识别水中的粪便污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims: The diversity of the fauna of the southern continents and oceans is of worldwide interest to researchers in universities, museums, and other centres. The New Zealand Journal of Zoology plays an important role in disseminating information on field-based, experimental, and theoretical research on the zoology of the region.
期刊最新文献
Review of the Priapulida of New Zealand with the description of a new species The use of artificial roosting structures by long-tailed bats (Chalinolobus tuberculatus) and non-target wildlife Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Gastropoda: Tateidae) in central Chile: new records, reproductive output assessment, and coexistence with native species Managing feral pigs to mitigate kauri dieback disease in the face of ecological and epidemiological uncertainty Occurrences and activities of New Zealand sea lions Phocarctos hookeri at non-natal Macquarie Island (1965–1980)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1