Fraud in Online Surveys: Evidence from a Nonprobability, Subpopulation Sample – ADDENDUM

IF 3.2 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Experimental Political Science Pub Date : 2022-07-13 DOI:10.1017/XPS.2022.12
Andrew M. Bell, Thomas Gift
{"title":"Fraud in Online Surveys: Evidence from a Nonprobability, Subpopulation Sample – ADDENDUM","authors":"Andrew M. Bell, Thomas Gift","doi":"10.1017/XPS.2022.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. Cite this article: Bell AM and Gift T (2023). Fraud in Online Surveys: Evidence from a Nonprobability, Subpopulation Sample – ADDENDUM. Journal of Experimental Political Science 10, 154. https:// doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2022.12 Journal of Experimental Political Science (2023), 10, 154 doi:10.1017/XPS.2022.12","PeriodicalId":37558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2022.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. Cite this article: Bell AM and Gift T (2023). Fraud in Online Surveys: Evidence from a Nonprobability, Subpopulation Sample – ADDENDUM. Journal of Experimental Political Science 10, 154. https:// doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2022.12 Journal of Experimental Political Science (2023), 10, 154 doi:10.1017/XPS.2022.12
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线调查中的欺诈行为:来自非概率亚群体样本的证据——附录
©作者,2022年。剑桥大学出版社代表美国政治学协会实验研究部出版。这是一篇开放获取的文章,根据知识共享署名许可证的条款分发(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),允许不受限制地重复使用、分发和复制,前提是正确引用了原始文章。引用这篇文章:Bell AM和Gift T(2023)。在线调查中的欺诈行为:来自不可能的亚群体样本的证据——附录。《实验政治学杂志》10154。https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2022.12《实验政治学杂志》(2023),10154 doi:10.1017/XPS.2022.12
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Political Science
Journal of Experimental Political Science Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Political Science (JEPS) features cutting-edge research that utilizes experimental methods or experimental reasoning based on naturally occurring data. We define experimental methods broadly: research featuring random (or quasi-random) assignment of subjects to different treatments in an effort to isolate causal relationships in the sphere of politics. JEPS embraces all of the different types of experiments carried out as part of political science research, including survey experiments, laboratory experiments, field experiments, lab experiments in the field, natural and neurological experiments. We invite authors to submit concise articles (around 4000 words or fewer) that immediately address the subject of the research. We do not require lengthy explanations regarding and justifications of the experimental method. Nor do we expect extensive literature reviews of pros and cons of the methodological approaches involved in the experiment unless the goal of the article is to explore these methodological issues. We expect readers to be familiar with experimental methods and therefore to not need pages of literature reviews to be convinced that experimental methods are a legitimate methodological approach. We will consider longer articles in rare, but appropriate cases, as in the following examples: when a new experimental method or approach is being introduced and discussed or when novel theoretical results are being evaluated through experimentation. Finally, we strongly encourage authors to submit manuscripts that showcase informative null findings or inconsistent results from well-designed, executed, and analyzed experiments.
期刊最新文献
The Way She Moves: Political Repositioning and Gender Stereotypes Public Health Communication Reduces COVID-19 Misinformation Sharing and Boosts Self-Efficacy (Small D-democratic) vacation, all I ever wanted? The effect of democratic backsliding on leisure travel in the American states Public Responses to Unilateral Policymaking More than meets the ITT: A guide for anticipating and investigating nonsignificant results in survey experiments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1