The majestic virtues of writing in Aurélia by Gérard de Nerval

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE Romanica Olomucensia Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.5507/ro.2022.008
Abderrahim El Bahi
{"title":"The majestic virtues of writing in Aurélia by Gérard de Nerval","authors":"Abderrahim El Bahi","doi":"10.5507/ro.2022.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work aims to address, in the light of a critical reading of Aurelia, the question of writing, envisaged as an “artistic work” of free imagination, a “sublimatory activity” of the constraints of the world, and which functions as a mechanism of psychological compensation for the author’s reality and as a motor of psychic liberation from individual tensions. To understand the implications of this concept, it has been drawn a critical paradigm from a multilateral concept of literature and literary texts, which are perceived as the point of the intersection of several approaches. To do this, on the basis of certain biographical, narrative, and aesthetic data, two complementary functions of the “pain” at work in Aurelia are examined: the function ‘constituent’ and the function ‘instituting’. Indeed, de Nerval’s experience of pain proves to be particularly “fruitful”, “productive”, “suggestive”, even “evocative”, since it seems to have a singular effect on his aesthetic sensitivity to the point of constituting a first vocation of writing and a source of poetic inspiration, and consequently finds a more ardent appeasement in writing. Nevertheless, in addition to being “constituent”, pain acquires a symbolically “subversive” status, “instituting” in the Nervalian narrative: it imposes itself by opposing and is essentially transformative of reality by imagination and the founder of the aesthetic enterprise of the work, shared between the psychosis of the author and the echo that it finds in the fictional universe of the story.","PeriodicalId":53749,"journal":{"name":"Romanica Olomucensia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanica Olomucensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/ro.2022.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present work aims to address, in the light of a critical reading of Aurelia, the question of writing, envisaged as an “artistic work” of free imagination, a “sublimatory activity” of the constraints of the world, and which functions as a mechanism of psychological compensation for the author’s reality and as a motor of psychic liberation from individual tensions. To understand the implications of this concept, it has been drawn a critical paradigm from a multilateral concept of literature and literary texts, which are perceived as the point of the intersection of several approaches. To do this, on the basis of certain biographical, narrative, and aesthetic data, two complementary functions of the “pain” at work in Aurelia are examined: the function ‘constituent’ and the function ‘instituting’. Indeed, de Nerval’s experience of pain proves to be particularly “fruitful”, “productive”, “suggestive”, even “evocative”, since it seems to have a singular effect on his aesthetic sensitivity to the point of constituting a first vocation of writing and a source of poetic inspiration, and consequently finds a more ardent appeasement in writing. Nevertheless, in addition to being “constituent”, pain acquires a symbolically “subversive” status, “instituting” in the Nervalian narrative: it imposes itself by opposing and is essentially transformative of reality by imagination and the founder of the aesthetic enterprise of the work, shared between the psychosis of the author and the echo that it finds in the fictional universe of the story.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
格姆拉德·德·内瓦尔在《奥拉西亚》中写作的崇高美德
根据对奥蕾莉亚的批判性解读,本作品旨在解决写作的问题,写作被设想为一种自由想象的“艺术作品”,一种对世界约束的“升华活动”,它作为一种对作者现实的心理补偿机制,作为一种从个人紧张中解放精神的动力。为了理解这一概念的含义,从文学和文学文本的多边概念中得出了一个批判性范式,这被认为是几种方法的交叉点。为了做到这一点,在某些传记、叙事和美学数据的基础上,研究了在《奥蕾莉亚》中起作用的“痛苦”的两个互补功能:功能“构成”和功能“建立”。的确,德内瓦尔的痛苦经历被证明是特别“富有成效”,“富有成效”,“具有启发性”,甚至“令人回味”,因为它似乎对他的审美敏感性产生了独特的影响,以至于构成了写作的第一职业和诗歌灵感的来源,并因此在写作中找到了更强烈的安抚。然而,除了作为“组成部分”之外,疼痛获得了一种象征性的“颠覆”地位,在神经系统叙事中“建立”:它通过反对来强加自己,本质上是通过想象和作品美学企业的创始人来改变现实,在作者的精神病和在故事的虚构世界中发现的回声之间共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Romanica Olomucensia
Romanica Olomucensia LITERATURE, ROMANCE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Refranes famosíssimos y provechosos glosados, work of a Catalan origin (València, c. 1500) Representations and narrative functions of empathy in Milan Kundera's The Unbearable Lightness of Being "Language Rituals" of Hassan Wahbi: when poetic writing becomes a place of reflexivity Pronominal phrases in the French translation of Miguel Delibes' Cinco horas con Mario Aspects of writing about difference in some of Abdelkébir Khatibi's texts: plural identity, thought-other, bi-language, and extraneity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1