Impact of “mindfulness” or full awareness meditation on learning abilities

Giovanni Lucero‐Romero, L. Arias-Bolzmann
{"title":"Impact of “mindfulness” or full awareness meditation on learning abilities","authors":"Giovanni Lucero‐Romero, L. Arias-Bolzmann","doi":"10.1108/ejmbe-07-2022-0218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study experimentally aims to determine the degree of influence that mindfulness training exerts on learning capacity at the university level and contrasts it with previous observational or relational studies that have shown contradictory results.Design/methodology/approachA quasi-experiment was carried out to measure the variation of six academic learning abilities – a) self-efficacy, b) organization of and attention to studies, c) stress control due to time pressure and the environment, d) involvement with college activity, e) emotional satisfaction, and f) class communication – which together comprise the research questionnaire called the college learning effectiveness inventory (CLEI). The CLEI questionnaire was administered before and after the participants were trained in the mindfulness technique. The study was conducted in Ecuador, and the participants were selected from among the graduate students of a local university.FindingsThe learning ability measured by the CLEI was improved by a statistically significant margin in the two groups.Research limitations/implicationsThe treatment groups consisted of graduate students who did not have opportunities for full-time activities on campus, as they were limited to attending regular classes at specific times, usually at night. The dropout rate was 14% due to inconveniences caused by the pandemic. These conditions could have affected the study results both positively and negatively. In addition, the pandemic limited academic interactions, which are required to evaluate the learning results after applying the research instrument. This limitation was especially critical for people who had experienced online classes only.Practical implicationsOffering graduate students the opportunity to learn about and adopt a mindfulness practice helps to improve their academic outcomes, as reflected through the statistical measurement of the CLEI indicator.Social implicationsThis study is especially relevant within the context of sanitary conditions due to the pandemic and the intensive use of technology for managing academic interactions, both of which have replaced physical contact between participants.Originality/valueThe main contributions of this study are related to the determination of the practical effects of mindfulness training in postgraduate university settings and the identification of the mechanisms involving participants' reflecting upon, learning and understanding the importance of perfecting their soft skills to facilitate their learning processes and face today's uncertain environments.","PeriodicalId":45118,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Management and Business Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Management and Business Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejmbe-07-2022-0218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study experimentally aims to determine the degree of influence that mindfulness training exerts on learning capacity at the university level and contrasts it with previous observational or relational studies that have shown contradictory results.Design/methodology/approachA quasi-experiment was carried out to measure the variation of six academic learning abilities – a) self-efficacy, b) organization of and attention to studies, c) stress control due to time pressure and the environment, d) involvement with college activity, e) emotional satisfaction, and f) class communication – which together comprise the research questionnaire called the college learning effectiveness inventory (CLEI). The CLEI questionnaire was administered before and after the participants were trained in the mindfulness technique. The study was conducted in Ecuador, and the participants were selected from among the graduate students of a local university.FindingsThe learning ability measured by the CLEI was improved by a statistically significant margin in the two groups.Research limitations/implicationsThe treatment groups consisted of graduate students who did not have opportunities for full-time activities on campus, as they were limited to attending regular classes at specific times, usually at night. The dropout rate was 14% due to inconveniences caused by the pandemic. These conditions could have affected the study results both positively and negatively. In addition, the pandemic limited academic interactions, which are required to evaluate the learning results after applying the research instrument. This limitation was especially critical for people who had experienced online classes only.Practical implicationsOffering graduate students the opportunity to learn about and adopt a mindfulness practice helps to improve their academic outcomes, as reflected through the statistical measurement of the CLEI indicator.Social implicationsThis study is especially relevant within the context of sanitary conditions due to the pandemic and the intensive use of technology for managing academic interactions, both of which have replaced physical contact between participants.Originality/valueThe main contributions of this study are related to the determination of the practical effects of mindfulness training in postgraduate university settings and the identification of the mechanisms involving participants' reflecting upon, learning and understanding the importance of perfecting their soft skills to facilitate their learning processes and face today's uncertain environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“正念”或全意识冥想对学习能力的影响
目的本研究旨在通过实验确定正念训练对大学学习能力的影响程度,并将其与之前的观察或关系研究进行对比,这些研究显示了相互矛盾的结果。设计/方法/方法进行了一项准实验来测量六种学术学习能力的变化——a)自我效能感,b)学习的组织和注意力,c)时间压力和环境造成的压力控制,d)参与大学活动,e)情绪满意度,以及f)课堂交流——它们共同组成了一份名为大学学习有效性问卷(CLEI)的研究问卷。CLEI问卷在参与者接受正念技巧训练前后进行。这项研究在厄瓜多尔进行,参与者是从当地一所大学的研究生中挑选出来的。结果两组通过CLEI测量的学习能力均有统计学意义的提高。研究局限性/影响治疗组由没有机会在校园内进行全职活动的研究生组成,因为他们只能在特定时间参加常规课程,通常是在晚上。由于疫情带来的不便,辍学率为14%。这些情况可能对研究结果产生积极和消极的影响。此外,疫情限制了学术互动,需要在应用研究工具后评估学习结果。这一限制对于那些只体验过在线课程的人来说尤其重要。实践含义通过CLEI指标的统计测量,为研究生提供学习和采用正念练习的机会有助于提高他们的学业成绩。社会影响这项研究在新冠疫情造成的卫生条件和对学术互动管理技术的密集使用的背景下尤其重要,这两项研究都取代了参与者之间的身体接触。原创性/价值本研究的主要贡献涉及确定研究生大学环境中正念训练的实际效果,以及确定参与者反思的机制,学习和理解完善他们的软技能的重要性,以促进他们的学习过程,并面对当今不确定的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Management and Business Economics is interested in the publication and diffusion of articles of rigorous theoretical, methodological or empirical research associated with the areas of business economics, including strategy, finance, management, marketing, organisation, human resources, operations, and corporate governance, and tourism. The journal aims to attract original knowledge based on academic rigour and of relevance for academics, researchers, professionals, and/or public decision-makers.
期刊最新文献
Exploring factors influencing smart tourism destination visiting behaviors in a historic country: a theory of e-consumption behavior Cognitive social capital and new product performance: indirect effect of potential absorptive and innovation capacity: a tourism-based study The relevance of legal requirements in the going public process: the discretionary decision of adopting an audit committee A comparative analysis of supply chain management between Portugal and Ireland “I love your brand! I engage with you, and I do online brand-related activities (COBRAs)”: the role of brand value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1