Thermoacoustic stability prediction using classification algorithms

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DataCentric Engineering Pub Date : 2022-04-25 DOI:10.1017/dce.2022.17
R. Gaudron, A. Morgans
{"title":"Thermoacoustic stability prediction using classification algorithms","authors":"R. Gaudron, A. Morgans","doi":"10.1017/dce.2022.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Predicting the occurrence of thermoacoustic instabilities is of major interest in a variety of engineering applications such as aircraft propulsion, power generation, and industrial heating. Predictive methodologies based on a physical approach have been developed in the past decades, but have a moderate-to-high computational cost when exploring a large number of designs. In this study, the stability prediction capabilities and computational cost of four well-established classification algorithms—the K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) algorithms—are investigated. These algorithms are trained using an in-house physics-based low-order network model tool called OSCILOS. All four algorithms are able to predict which configurations are thermoacoustically unstable with a very high accuracy and a very low runtime. Furthermore, the frequency intervals containing unstable modes for a given configuration are also accurately predicted using multilabel classification. The RF algorithm correctly predicts the overall stability and finds all frequency intervals containing unstable modes for 99.6 and 98.3% of all configurations, respectively, which makes it the most accurate algorithm when a large number of training examples is available. For smaller training sets, the MLP algorithm becomes the most accurate algorithm. The DT algorithm is found to be slightly less accurate, but can be trained extremely quickly and runs about a million times faster than a traditional physics-based low-order network model tool. These findings could be used to devise a new generation of combustor optimization tools that would run much faster than existing codes while retaining a similar accuracy.","PeriodicalId":34169,"journal":{"name":"DataCentric Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DataCentric Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2022.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Predicting the occurrence of thermoacoustic instabilities is of major interest in a variety of engineering applications such as aircraft propulsion, power generation, and industrial heating. Predictive methodologies based on a physical approach have been developed in the past decades, but have a moderate-to-high computational cost when exploring a large number of designs. In this study, the stability prediction capabilities and computational cost of four well-established classification algorithms—the K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) algorithms—are investigated. These algorithms are trained using an in-house physics-based low-order network model tool called OSCILOS. All four algorithms are able to predict which configurations are thermoacoustically unstable with a very high accuracy and a very low runtime. Furthermore, the frequency intervals containing unstable modes for a given configuration are also accurately predicted using multilabel classification. The RF algorithm correctly predicts the overall stability and finds all frequency intervals containing unstable modes for 99.6 and 98.3% of all configurations, respectively, which makes it the most accurate algorithm when a large number of training examples is available. For smaller training sets, the MLP algorithm becomes the most accurate algorithm. The DT algorithm is found to be slightly less accurate, but can be trained extremely quickly and runs about a million times faster than a traditional physics-based low-order network model tool. These findings could be used to devise a new generation of combustor optimization tools that would run much faster than existing codes while retaining a similar accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于分类算法的热声稳定性预测
预测热声不稳定性的发生在飞机推进、发电和工业加热等各种工程应用中具有重要意义。基于物理方法的预测方法在过去几十年中得到了发展,但是在探索大量设计时具有中等到高的计算成本。在本研究中,研究了四种成熟的分类算法——k近邻、决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)和多层感知器(MLP)算法的稳定性预测能力和计算成本。这些算法使用内部基于物理的低阶网络模型工具OSCILOS进行训练。所有四种算法都能够以非常高的精度和非常低的运行时间预测哪些结构是热声不稳定的。此外,对于给定的配置,包含不稳定模式的频率区间也可以使用多标签分类进行准确预测。在99.6%和98.3%的配置中,RF算法正确地预测了整体稳定性,并找到了包含不稳定模式的所有频率区间,使其成为在大量训练样例可用时最准确的算法。对于较小的训练集,MLP算法成为最准确的算法。DT算法的准确性略低,但训练速度非常快,运行速度比传统的基于物理的低阶网络模型工具快100万倍。这些发现可以用来设计新一代的燃烧器优化工具,这些工具将比现有代码运行得快得多,同时保持相似的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
DataCentric Engineering
DataCentric Engineering Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Semantic 3D city interfaces—Intelligent interactions on dynamic geospatial knowledge graphs Optical network physical layer parameter optimization for digital backpropagation using Gaussian processes Finite element model updating with quantified uncertainties using point cloud data Evaluating probabilistic forecasts for maritime engineering operations Bottom-up forecasting: Applications and limitations in load forecasting using smart-meter data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1