¿Las víctimas de trata pueden tener acceso a la protección internacional? Análisis de las posibilidades de refugio o de protección subsidiaria en la Unión Europea

Alexandre Moreno Urpí
{"title":"¿Las víctimas de trata pueden tener acceso a la protección internacional? Análisis de las posibilidades de refugio o de protección subsidiaria en la Unión Europea","authors":"Alexandre Moreno Urpí","doi":"10.18042/cepc/rdce.74.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research responds to the need to systematise access to international protection within the framework of the European Union (EU) for victims of trafficking in human beings, given that neither the 1951 Refugee Convention, nor the 1967 New York Protocol, nor Directive 2011/95/EU deem this criminal activity justifiable cause for such protection. Granting refuge or subsidiary protection to victims of trafficking who are not nationals of an EU Member State, especially after they have been granted protection under EU law, may offer means to assist them, protect them and prevent them from being sent back to their country of origin, which would exponentially increase their risk of being exploited again by trafficking networks. A detailed analysis of eligibility for international protection in this domain shows that, in some cases, the circumstances surrounding the victims of trafficking may justify the recognition of international protection by EU Member States. Each individual case must be assessed and addressed under the established requirements, with particular attention paid to the existence of acts of prosecution and the grounds that motive these acts, as this is the aspect that poses the greatest challenges in relation to the phenomenon of human trafficking.","PeriodicalId":43708,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rdce.74.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research responds to the need to systematise access to international protection within the framework of the European Union (EU) for victims of trafficking in human beings, given that neither the 1951 Refugee Convention, nor the 1967 New York Protocol, nor Directive 2011/95/EU deem this criminal activity justifiable cause for such protection. Granting refuge or subsidiary protection to victims of trafficking who are not nationals of an EU Member State, especially after they have been granted protection under EU law, may offer means to assist them, protect them and prevent them from being sent back to their country of origin, which would exponentially increase their risk of being exploited again by trafficking networks. A detailed analysis of eligibility for international protection in this domain shows that, in some cases, the circumstances surrounding the victims of trafficking may justify the recognition of international protection by EU Member States. Each individual case must be assessed and addressed under the established requirements, with particular attention paid to the existence of acts of prosecution and the grounds that motive these acts, as this is the aspect that poses the greatest challenges in relation to the phenomenon of human trafficking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人口贩运受害者能否获得国际保护?分析欧洲联盟内庇护或辅助保护的可能性
鉴于1951年的《难民公约》、1967年的《纽约议定书》和2011/95/EU号指令均未将这一犯罪活动视为获得此类保护的正当理由,本研究回应了在欧盟框架内对人口贩运受害者获得国际保护的系统性需求。向非欧盟成员国国民的贩运受害者提供庇护或辅助保护,特别是在他们根据欧盟法律获得保护之后,可能提供帮助他们、保护他们并防止他们被送回原籍国的手段,这将成倍增加他们再次被贩运网络利用的风险。对这一领域国际保护资格的详细分析表明,在某些情况下,围绕贩运受害者的情况可能证明欧盟成员国有理由承认国际保护。每一个个案都必须根据既定的要求进行评估和处理,并特别注意是否存在起诉行为以及这些行为的动机,因为这是对贩卖人口现象构成最大挑战的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
La Comisión Europea y el interés general de la Unión Application of rules or policies in the ECB? Legal and institutional challenges impacting the climate transition El Tribunal de Justicia y la Unión Europea como una "Unión de valores" Crónica de jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, mayo-agosto 2023 Cambio de rumbo en la política comercial común de la Unión Europea: de la promoción a la condición
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1