Binge Drinkers Shouldn’t Set Their Own Alcohol Reduction Goals! Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Goal-Based Alcohol Reduction Interventions among Young People

IF 0.6 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-02-04 DOI:10.1080/07347324.2022.2037486
Mark Rubin, A. Hutton
{"title":"Binge Drinkers Shouldn’t Set Their Own Alcohol Reduction Goals! Evaluating the Effectiveness of Different Goal-Based Alcohol Reduction Interventions among Young People","authors":"Mark Rubin, A. Hutton","doi":"10.1080/07347324.2022.2037486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present research aimed to investigate the relative effectiveness of three types of alcohol reduction intervention. Participants were 354 university students from an Australian university. After completing an initial survey, they were randomly assigned to either (a) follow national guidelines for alcohol consumption, (b) set their own personal alcohol consumption reduction goal, or (c) work with their peers to set a goal. Participants then recorded their alcohol consumption in a drinking diary over a period of four weeks. The results showed that participants in the personal goal condition reported significantly higher alcohol consumption than those in the national guidelines conditions, with participants in the group goal condition reporting mid-level alcohol consumption. This effect was moderated by binge drinking propensity. Personal goal setting was most likely to lead to higher alcohol consumption when participants scored relatively high on measures of binge drinking propensity. These findings highlight the point that different types of alcohol reduction interventions may be effective for different types of people. In particular, people who have a relatively high propensity for binge drinking should be encouraged to follow goals that have been set by authorities (e.g., national guidelines) rather than by themselves.","PeriodicalId":45949,"journal":{"name":"Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2022.2037486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present research aimed to investigate the relative effectiveness of three types of alcohol reduction intervention. Participants were 354 university students from an Australian university. After completing an initial survey, they were randomly assigned to either (a) follow national guidelines for alcohol consumption, (b) set their own personal alcohol consumption reduction goal, or (c) work with their peers to set a goal. Participants then recorded their alcohol consumption in a drinking diary over a period of four weeks. The results showed that participants in the personal goal condition reported significantly higher alcohol consumption than those in the national guidelines conditions, with participants in the group goal condition reporting mid-level alcohol consumption. This effect was moderated by binge drinking propensity. Personal goal setting was most likely to lead to higher alcohol consumption when participants scored relatively high on measures of binge drinking propensity. These findings highlight the point that different types of alcohol reduction interventions may be effective for different types of people. In particular, people who have a relatively high propensity for binge drinking should be encouraged to follow goals that have been set by authorities (e.g., national guidelines) rather than by themselves.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酗酒者不应该设定自己的减酒目标!评估不同基于目标的青少年酒精减少干预措施的有效性
摘要本研究旨在探讨三种类型的酒精减少干预的相对有效性。参与者是来自澳大利亚一所大学的354名大学生。在完成初步调查后,他们被随机分配(a)遵循国家酒精消费指南,(b)设定自己的个人酒精消费减少目标,或(c)与同龄人一起设定目标。然后,参与者在为期四周的饮酒日记中记录他们的饮酒量。结果表明,个人目标条件下的参与者报告的酒精消费量明显高于国家指导条件下的参与者,而团体目标条件下的参与者报告的酒精消费量为中等水平。这种影响被酗酒倾向所缓和。当参与者在酗酒倾向的测量中得分相对较高时,个人目标设定最有可能导致更高的饮酒量。这些发现强调了一点,即不同类型的酒精减少干预措施可能对不同类型的人有效。特别是,应该鼓励酗酒倾向相对较高的人遵循当局(例如国家指南)而不是他们自己设定的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly is an exciting professional journal for clinicians working with persons who are alcoholic and their families. Designed to bridge the gap between research journals and information for the general public, it addresses the specific concerns of professional alcoholism counselors, social workers, psychologists, physicians, clergy, nurses, employee assistance professionals, and others who provide direct services to persons who are alcoholic. The journal features articles specifically related to the treatment of alcoholism, highlighting new and innovative approaches to care, describing clinical problems and solutions, and detailing practical, unique approaches to intervention and therapy.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Recovery Capital in Alcoholics Anonymous Members Evaluation of Web-Based Digital Intervention to Change Individual’s Drinking Behaviours Common Therapeutic Factors in Group Therapy for Substance Use Disorders Family History of Pathological Gambling, Related Factors Effects, and Suicidality in Rural Greece The Effectiveness of a TPB Educational Program for Preventing Alcohol Use Among Adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1