Coleridge and the Materiality of Translucence

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY European Romantic Review Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1080/10509585.2023.2225443
Blake Allen
{"title":"Coleridge and the Materiality of Translucence","authors":"Blake Allen","doi":"10.1080/10509585.2023.2225443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Paul de Man’s thoroughgoing critique of Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s symbol, which has had a lasting impact on Romantic scholarship, is based upon the supposed incompatibility of materiality and “translucence.” This article sets out to deconstruct de Man’s argument on the basis of a specific appeal to materiality. But it also takes his critique as a virtuous provocation to clarify the relationship between materiality and the metaphysics and phenomenology of translucence. Towards this end, the article develops a material history of translucence, focusing on Coleridge’s early notebook descriptions of weather phenomena, light, and water, and his representations of light in his poem, “This Lime-Tree Bower My Prison.”","PeriodicalId":43566,"journal":{"name":"European Romantic Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"423 - 440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Romantic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10509585.2023.2225443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Paul de Man’s thoroughgoing critique of Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s symbol, which has had a lasting impact on Romantic scholarship, is based upon the supposed incompatibility of materiality and “translucence.” This article sets out to deconstruct de Man’s argument on the basis of a specific appeal to materiality. But it also takes his critique as a virtuous provocation to clarify the relationship between materiality and the metaphysics and phenomenology of translucence. Towards this end, the article develops a material history of translucence, focusing on Coleridge’s early notebook descriptions of weather phenomena, light, and water, and his representations of light in his poem, “This Lime-Tree Bower My Prison.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柯勒律治与“半透明”的物质性
保罗·德曼对塞缪尔·泰勒·柯勒律治的象征进行了彻底的批判,这对浪漫主义学术产生了持久的影响,他的批判是基于物质性和“半透明”的不相容。本文试图在对物质性的特殊诉求的基础上解构德曼的论点。但同时也把他的批判作为澄清物质性与半透明的形而上学和现象学之间关系的良性挑衅。为此,本文发展了半透明的物质历史,重点关注柯勒律治早期笔记中对天气现象、光和水的描述,以及他在诗歌《这棵椴树的凉亭我的监狱》中对光的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Romantic Review
European Romantic Review HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The European Romantic Review publishes innovative scholarship on the literature and culture of Europe, Great Britain and the Americas during the period 1760-1840. Topics range from the scientific and psychological interests of German and English authors through the political and social reverberations of the French Revolution to the philosophical and ecological implications of Anglo-American nature writing. Selected papers from the annual conference of the North American Society for the Study of Romanticism appear in one of the five issues published each year.
期刊最新文献
Farmers’ Boys and Doomed Youths: Producing the Poet in the Print Culture of the Romantic Era Leonora Sansay’s Secret History; or, The Horrors of St. Domingo and Frames of Personhood Romanticism and Deaf Justice “Genial” Perception: Wordsworth, Coleridge, and the Myth of Genius in the Long Eighteenth Century; The Intelligible Ode: Intimations of Paradise Romantic Medicine and the Gothic Imagination: Morbid Anatomies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1