A systematic literature review of studies on women at the top of firm hierarchies: critique, gap analysis and future research directions

IF 5.2 4区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1108/sampj-10-2022-0557
Camilla Ciappei, G. Liberatore, Giacomo Manetti
{"title":"A systematic literature review of studies on women at the top of firm hierarchies: critique, gap analysis and future research directions","authors":"Camilla Ciappei, G. Liberatore, Giacomo Manetti","doi":"10.1108/sampj-10-2022-0557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to holistically explore the academic literature on female leaders to identify the key topics and dynamics of the field.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors systematically review 532 papers to explore the research on female leaders; based on objective and replicable criteria, the authors identify relevant papers and thus ensure the quality of the analysis. The bibliometric analysis and visualization support us in recognizing trends in this topic.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study outlines the state of the art over the past decade by synthesizing theoretical contexts and critically discussing the main streams of research on sustainability, firm outcomes and barriers preventing women from reaching the upper echelons. The authors also explore empirical issues and highlight areas that entail new paths for future scholars.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe research provides novel evidence of the attempt internationally to increase female participation at the top of the firm hierarchy by analyzing firm outcomes, sustainability and the constraints faced by women in achieving these careers.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe results show that the participation of women in leadership roles is not (only) a matter of compliance with current regulations. Through their ability to monitor key social and environmental issues from a long-term perspective and their attention to the internal control systems, companies more effectively pursue their financial and nonfinancial aims.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nUsing bibliographic and narrative analyses, this study reviews the literature on women at the top of the firm hierarchy with a focus on business research. The authors extend prior studies by investigating a larger pool of firm roles to provide a comprehensive understanding of this widely discussed topic.\n","PeriodicalId":22143,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-10-2022-0557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to holistically explore the academic literature on female leaders to identify the key topics and dynamics of the field. Design/methodology/approach The authors systematically review 532 papers to explore the research on female leaders; based on objective and replicable criteria, the authors identify relevant papers and thus ensure the quality of the analysis. The bibliometric analysis and visualization support us in recognizing trends in this topic. Findings This study outlines the state of the art over the past decade by synthesizing theoretical contexts and critically discussing the main streams of research on sustainability, firm outcomes and barriers preventing women from reaching the upper echelons. The authors also explore empirical issues and highlight areas that entail new paths for future scholars. Practical implications The research provides novel evidence of the attempt internationally to increase female participation at the top of the firm hierarchy by analyzing firm outcomes, sustainability and the constraints faced by women in achieving these careers. Social implications The results show that the participation of women in leadership roles is not (only) a matter of compliance with current regulations. Through their ability to monitor key social and environmental issues from a long-term perspective and their attention to the internal control systems, companies more effectively pursue their financial and nonfinancial aims. Originality/value Using bibliographic and narrative analyses, this study reviews the literature on women at the top of the firm hierarchy with a focus on business research. The authors extend prior studies by investigating a larger pool of firm roles to provide a comprehensive understanding of this widely discussed topic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对公司高层女性研究的系统文献综述:批评、差距分析和未来研究方向
目的本研究旨在全面探讨关于女性领导者的学术文献,以确定该领域的关键主题和动态。设计/方法论/方法作者系统地回顾了532篇论文,探讨了女性领导者的研究;基于客观和可复制的标准,作者识别相关论文,从而确保分析的质量。文献计量分析和可视化支持我们认识这一主题的趋势。发现这项研究通过综合理论背景,批判性地讨论了可持续性、企业成果和阻碍女性进入高层的障碍等主要研究领域,概述了过去十年的最新进展。作者还探讨了实证问题,并强调了为未来学者开辟新道路的领域。实际含义这项研究提供了新的证据,证明国际上试图通过分析公司成果、可持续性和女性在实现这些职业时面临的限制,来增加女性在公司高层的参与度。社会影响研究结果表明,妇女参与领导角色并不是(唯一)遵守现行法规的问题。通过能够从长期角度监测关键的社会和环境问题,并关注内部控制系统,公司能够更有效地实现其财务和非财务目标。独创性/价值本研究通过文献和叙述分析,回顾了有关公司高层女性的文献,重点是商业研究。作者通过调查更大的公司角色库来扩展先前的研究,以提供对这一广泛讨论的主题的全面理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Investigating the barriers and strategies for establishing desalination plants to mitigate water scarcity in Sri Lankan dry zones Environmental sustainability balanced scorecard: a strategic map for joint action by municipalities Advancing fiscal transparency in Latin American countries: new findings in reports on tax sustainability in Chile Forward-looking information: does IIRC framework adoption matter? Environment court, shareholder conflict and corporate governance: evidence from market reactions to bank loan announcements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1