SANTIAGO – VILLARRICA – BARCELONA: THE STATISTICAL INVESTIGATIVE CYCLE IN PRIMARY EDUCATION TEACHER TRAINING

Q3 Social Sciences Statistics Education Research Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-25 DOI:10.52041/serj.v20i2.392
Francisca M. Ubilla, Claudia Vásquez, Francisco FRANCISCO ROJAS, Núria Gorgorió
{"title":"SANTIAGO – VILLARRICA – BARCELONA: THE STATISTICAL INVESTIGATIVE CYCLE IN PRIMARY EDUCATION TEACHER TRAINING","authors":"Francisca M. Ubilla, Claudia Vásquez, Francisco FRANCISCO ROJAS, Núria Gorgorió","doi":"10.52041/serj.v20i2.392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the ability to complete an investigative cycle as an indicator of the robustness of students’ statistical knowledge. From this standpoint, we analyzed the written reports of primary education student teachers when they developed an investigative cycle in a Chilean and a Spanish university. In their development of the stages of the cycle we observed characteristics common to the centers (for example, summary research questions and conclusions that are a simple concatenation of results), and differential features (the data collection tools and techniques, among others). Armed with a knowledge of how future teachers approach and understand an investigative cycle we are able to contribute ideas that influence their training, building bridges between what they learn and what they should teach.\nAbstract: Spanish\nConsideramos la capacidad para completar un ciclo de investigación estadística como indicador de la robustez del conocimiento estadístico del estudiante. Desde este posicionamiento, analizamos las producciones escritas de profesores de enseñanza básica en formación cuando desarrollan un ciclo de investigación en una universidad Chilena y una Española. En las concreciones de las fases del ciclo observamos características comunes entre los centros (por ejemplo, preguntas de investigación tipo resumen y conclusiones como simple concatenación de resultados), y elementos diferenciales (instrumentos y técnicas de recogida de datos, entre otros). Conocer cómo abordan y comprenden el ciclo de investigación los futuros profesores nos permite aportar ideas para incidir en su formación, tendiendo puentes entre lo que aprenden y lo que deberán enseñar.\n ","PeriodicalId":38581,"journal":{"name":"Statistics Education Research Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics Education Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v20i2.392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We consider the ability to complete an investigative cycle as an indicator of the robustness of students’ statistical knowledge. From this standpoint, we analyzed the written reports of primary education student teachers when they developed an investigative cycle in a Chilean and a Spanish university. In their development of the stages of the cycle we observed characteristics common to the centers (for example, summary research questions and conclusions that are a simple concatenation of results), and differential features (the data collection tools and techniques, among others). Armed with a knowledge of how future teachers approach and understand an investigative cycle we are able to contribute ideas that influence their training, building bridges between what they learn and what they should teach. Abstract: Spanish Consideramos la capacidad para completar un ciclo de investigación estadística como indicador de la robustez del conocimiento estadístico del estudiante. Desde este posicionamiento, analizamos las producciones escritas de profesores de enseñanza básica en formación cuando desarrollan un ciclo de investigación en una universidad Chilena y una Española. En las concreciones de las fases del ciclo observamos características comunes entre los centros (por ejemplo, preguntas de investigación tipo resumen y conclusiones como simple concatenación de resultados), y elementos diferenciales (instrumentos y técnicas de recogida de datos, entre otros). Conocer cómo abordan y comprenden el ciclo de investigación los futuros profesores nos permite aportar ideas para incidir en su formación, tendiendo puentes entre lo que aprenden y lo que deberán enseñar.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
圣地亚哥-比利亚里卡-巴塞罗那:小学教育教师培训的统计调查周期
我们认为完成研究周期的能力是学生统计知识健全性的指标。从这一点出发,我们分析了小学学生教师在智利和西班牙大学进行研究周期时的书面报告。在其周期阶段的发展中,我们观察到了中心的共同特征(例如,研究问题和结论是结果的简单串联)和差异特征(数据收集工具和技术等)。有了对未来教师如何方法和理解研究周期的了解,我们能够贡献影响他们培训的想法,在他们所学的和他们应该教的之间架起桥梁。摘要:西班牙认为完成统计研究周期的能力是学生统计知识鲁棒性的指标。从这一立场出发,我们分析了接受培训的基础教育教师在智利和西班牙大学进行研究周期时的书面作品。在周期阶段的具体化中,我们观察到各中心之间的共同特征(例如,总结型研究问题和结论,如结果的简单串联)和差异要素(数据收集工具和技术等)。了解未来的教师如何处理和理解研究周期,使我们能够提供想法,影响他们的培训,在他们所学的和他们必须教的东西之间架起桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics Education Research Journal
Statistics Education Research Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: SERJ is a peer-reviewed electronic journal of the International Association for Statistical Education (IASE) and the International Statistical Institute (ISI). SERJ is published twice a year and is free. SERJ aims to advance research-based knowledge that can help to improve the teaching, learning, and understanding of statistics or probability at all educational levels and in both formal (classroom-based) and informal (out-of-classroom) contexts. Such research may examine, for example, cognitive, motivational, attitudinal, curricular, teaching-related, technology-related, organizational, or societal factors and processes that are related to the development and understanding of stochastic knowledge. In addition, research may focus on how people use or apply statistical and probabilistic information and ideas, broadly viewed. The Journal encourages the submission of quality papers related to the above goals, such as reports of original research (both quantitative and qualitative), integrative and critical reviews of research literature, analyses of research-based theoretical and methodological models, and other types of papers described in full in the Guidelines for Authors. All papers are reviewed internally by an Associate Editor or Editor, and are blind-reviewed by at least two external referees. Contributions in English are recommended. Contributions in French and Spanish will also be considered. A submitted paper must not have been published before or be under consideration for publication elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
TEACHING AND LEARNING TO CONSTRUCT DATA-BASED DECISION TREES USING DATA CARDS AS THE FIRST INTRODUCTION TO MACHINE LEARNING IN MIDDLE SCHOOL EXAMINING THE ROLE OF CONTEXT IN STATISTICAL LITERACY OUTCOMES USING AN ISOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT BRAZILIAN RESEARCH IN STATISTICS, PROBABILITY AND COMBINATORICS EDUCATION: A LOOK AT THESES RESOURCES AND TENSIONS IN STUDENT THINKING ABOUT STATISTICAL DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES TO LEARN MEAN, MEDIAN, AND MODE AFFORDED BY TEXTBOOK TASKS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1