[P1–006]: TAU PATHOLOGY BURDEN ASSOCIATED WITH LEVEL OF COGNITIVE RESERVE IN ALZHEIMER's DISEASE

IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Alzheimer's & Dementia Pub Date : 2017-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.073
Merle C. Hönig, Gerard N. Bischof, Jochen Hammes, Jennifer Faber, Klaus Fliessbach, Thilo van Eimeren, Alexander Drzezga
{"title":"[P1–006]: TAU PATHOLOGY BURDEN ASSOCIATED WITH LEVEL OF COGNITIVE RESERVE IN ALZHEIMER's DISEASE","authors":"Merle C. Hönig,&nbsp;Gerard N. Bischof,&nbsp;Jochen Hammes,&nbsp;Jennifer Faber,&nbsp;Klaus Fliessbach,&nbsp;Thilo van Eimeren,&nbsp;Alexander Drzezga","doi":"10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>PET studies have demonstrated that higher educated patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) display greater levels of beta amyloid pathology than lower educated patients with equal symptom severity, supporting the concept of cognitive reserve. Whether similar associations exist for <i>in vivo</i> tau pathology remains elusive, although closer relations between tau-deposition and cognitive decline have been reported. Therefore, this study examined differences in tau pathology load and spread in higher versus lower educated AD patients using [<sup>18</sup>F]AV-1451-PET imaging.</p><p>24 patients with typical AD were grouped into a higher (HEAD) and lower educated (LEAD) group. The two groups were matched for age and cognition measured by the Mini Mental State Examination. Additionally, a group of 14 age-matched healthy controls was included. [<sup>18</sup>F]AV-1451-PET scans were acquired to assess cerebral tau-burden. Regional tau ratios (reference region: cerebellum) were determined in a set of regions of interest (ROIs) which were defined according to the pathological disease stages by Braak &amp; Braak. The obtained tau ratios were then compared between the groups. Furthermore, whole brain voxel-wise comparisons were conducted using Statistical Parametric Mapping to determine differences in tau-distribution between each AD-group and the healthy controls, respectively, as well as between the two AD-groups.</p><p>The ROI analysis yielded tau pathology in regions corresponding to more advanced Braak stages exclusively in the HEAD group, whereas tau pathology in the LEAD group was still confined to lower Braak stages. These results were confirmed by voxel-wise comparisons revealing higher tau levels in dorsomedial fronto-parietal cortical areas in the HEAD group when compared to the LEAD group.</p><p>Highly educated AD patients seem to be able to tolerate more tau tangle pathology than lower educated patients with comparable cognitive impairment in support of the cognitive reserve hypothesis. These cognitive reserve-related differences in disease manifestation have crucial implications for early detection of AD, prognosis and assessment of disease progression and the monitoring of drug treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":7471,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","volume":"13 7S_Part_4","pages":"P233"},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.073","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's & Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.073","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PET studies have demonstrated that higher educated patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) display greater levels of beta amyloid pathology than lower educated patients with equal symptom severity, supporting the concept of cognitive reserve. Whether similar associations exist for in vivo tau pathology remains elusive, although closer relations between tau-deposition and cognitive decline have been reported. Therefore, this study examined differences in tau pathology load and spread in higher versus lower educated AD patients using [18F]AV-1451-PET imaging.

24 patients with typical AD were grouped into a higher (HEAD) and lower educated (LEAD) group. The two groups were matched for age and cognition measured by the Mini Mental State Examination. Additionally, a group of 14 age-matched healthy controls was included. [18F]AV-1451-PET scans were acquired to assess cerebral tau-burden. Regional tau ratios (reference region: cerebellum) were determined in a set of regions of interest (ROIs) which were defined according to the pathological disease stages by Braak & Braak. The obtained tau ratios were then compared between the groups. Furthermore, whole brain voxel-wise comparisons were conducted using Statistical Parametric Mapping to determine differences in tau-distribution between each AD-group and the healthy controls, respectively, as well as between the two AD-groups.

The ROI analysis yielded tau pathology in regions corresponding to more advanced Braak stages exclusively in the HEAD group, whereas tau pathology in the LEAD group was still confined to lower Braak stages. These results were confirmed by voxel-wise comparisons revealing higher tau levels in dorsomedial fronto-parietal cortical areas in the HEAD group when compared to the LEAD group.

Highly educated AD patients seem to be able to tolerate more tau tangle pathology than lower educated patients with comparable cognitive impairment in support of the cognitive reserve hypothesis. These cognitive reserve-related differences in disease manifestation have crucial implications for early detection of AD, prognosis and assessment of disease progression and the monitoring of drug treatments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[p1 - 06]:认知储备水平与TAU病理负荷的关系
PET研究表明,高学历阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者比同等症状严重程度的低学历患者表现出更高水平的β淀粉样蛋白病理,支持认知储备的概念。尽管有报道称tau沉积与认知能力下降之间存在更密切的关系,但体内tau病理是否存在类似的关联仍然难以捉摸。因此,本研究通过[18F]AV-1451-PET成像检测高学历AD患者与低学历AD患者tau病理负荷和扩散的差异。24例典型AD患者分为高学历组(HEAD)和低学历组(LEAD)。两组的年龄和认知能力通过迷你精神状态检查进行匹配。此外,还包括一组14名年龄匹配的健康对照。[18F]采用AV-1451-PET扫描评估脑负荷。区域tau比值(参考区域:小脑)在一组感兴趣区域(roi)中确定,这些区域根据病理疾病分期由Braak和amp;Braak。然后比较各组之间获得的tau比率。此外,采用统计参数映射进行全脑体素比较,以确定每个ad组与健康对照组之间以及两个ad组之间tau分布的差异。ROI分析显示,在HEAD组中,tau病理只出现在更高级的Braak分期对应的区域,而LEAD组的tau病理仍然局限于较低的Braak分期。这些结果通过体素比较得到证实,与LEAD组相比,HEAD组的背内侧额顶叶皮质区tau水平更高。高学历的AD患者似乎比低学历的认知障碍患者能够忍受更多的tau缠结病理,这支持了认知储备假说。这些认知储备相关的疾病表现差异对阿尔茨海默病的早期发现、疾病进展的预后和评估以及药物治疗的监测具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Alzheimer's & Dementia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
299
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's & Dementia is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to bridge knowledge gaps in dementia research by covering the entire spectrum, from basic science to clinical trials to social and behavioral investigations. It provides a platform for rapid communication of new findings and ideas, optimal translation of research into practical applications, increasing knowledge across diverse disciplines for early detection, diagnosis, and intervention, and identifying promising new research directions. In July 2008, Alzheimer's & Dementia was accepted for indexing by MEDLINE, recognizing its scientific merit and contribution to Alzheimer's research.
期刊最新文献
Spatially resolved transcriptomic profiling identifies distinct signatures in parenchymal and vascular microenvironments in Alzheimer's Disease with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy The partnership between the Alzheimer's Association, Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRCs), and the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) in advancing Alzheimer's disease research and care Correction to “Effect of tau burden and Lewy pathology on neuropsychiatric symptoms in Aβ‐positive individuals” Clinical meaningfulness of anti‐amyloid therapies in early Alzheimer's disease: Perspectives from the East and Southeast Asia region Association of apolipoprotein E variants on Alzheimer's disease in Latin America: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1