Editorial

Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI:10.1080/21507686.2018.1493372
R. Zhou
{"title":"Editorial","authors":"R. Zhou","doi":"10.1080/21507686.2018.1493372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This issue is a collection of articles that examines effective supervision and provides reflective models based on case work with additional empirical research studies and a book review. In this edition of the Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, practitioners from Hong Kong, India, Israel, Canada and the United States give voice to their ideas and experiences of counselling and psychotherapy from differing perspectives. Regardless of the level of experience of counsellors and psychotherapists, supervision is required to enable them to reflect on their practice as well as to encourage critical self-care to sustain themselves and work effectively with their clients. Karin Jordan proposes a trauma-informed counselling supervision, especially involving traumaaffected clients. This supervision model can be considered to assist clinical supervisors to support counsellors who are working with trauma-affected clients. Self-reflection is a core ability and an attribute that human service professionals find essential. Smadar Ben-Asher and Nitza Roskin develop a structured reflective tool which originates from psychotherapy and operates on the basis of self-narrative. With an emphasis on reflective examination of the event, critical observation, re-conceptualisation, and new action, the tool, as discussed in their paper, can help educational counselling students gain a reflective understanding of their own personal and professional development during the educational or training process. A qualitative approach is employed to analyse narratives of the interviewees and demonstrate the effectiveness of the tool in Ben-Asher and Roskin’s paper. Assessment of needs of clients serves to help counsellors and psychotherapists better understand the situation of their clients. In their article, Palanisamy Amirthalingam, Rajendran Natham and Gnaesvaran Arunachalam examine the usefulness of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). They compare the MOCA and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) as means to attend to the cognitive status of epilepsy population receiving phenytoin monotherapy. This study suggests that the sensitivity of the MOCA as an assessment tool can help counsellors to identify the clients who have mild cognitive impairment and provide hints for appropriate counselling service. An additional assessment related study in this issue addresses the development of a Japanese version of the Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale (SUIS-J). Yasuko Tanaka, Naoki Yoshinaga, Aki Tsuchiyagaito, Chihiro Sutoh, Daisuke Matsuzawa, Yoshiyuki Hirano, Michiko Nakazato and Eiji Shimizu conducted two studies. In study 1, they translated and validated a Japanese version of Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale (SUIS-J). In study 2, this scale was rated by people with social anxiety disorders before and after the CBT. Their study examined the relationship between mental imagery and social anxiety symptoms. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF COUNSELLING AND PSYCHOTHERAPY 2018, VOL. 9, NO. 2, 125–126 https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2018.1493372","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21507686.2018.1493372","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2018.1493372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This issue is a collection of articles that examines effective supervision and provides reflective models based on case work with additional empirical research studies and a book review. In this edition of the Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, practitioners from Hong Kong, India, Israel, Canada and the United States give voice to their ideas and experiences of counselling and psychotherapy from differing perspectives. Regardless of the level of experience of counsellors and psychotherapists, supervision is required to enable them to reflect on their practice as well as to encourage critical self-care to sustain themselves and work effectively with their clients. Karin Jordan proposes a trauma-informed counselling supervision, especially involving traumaaffected clients. This supervision model can be considered to assist clinical supervisors to support counsellors who are working with trauma-affected clients. Self-reflection is a core ability and an attribute that human service professionals find essential. Smadar Ben-Asher and Nitza Roskin develop a structured reflective tool which originates from psychotherapy and operates on the basis of self-narrative. With an emphasis on reflective examination of the event, critical observation, re-conceptualisation, and new action, the tool, as discussed in their paper, can help educational counselling students gain a reflective understanding of their own personal and professional development during the educational or training process. A qualitative approach is employed to analyse narratives of the interviewees and demonstrate the effectiveness of the tool in Ben-Asher and Roskin’s paper. Assessment of needs of clients serves to help counsellors and psychotherapists better understand the situation of their clients. In their article, Palanisamy Amirthalingam, Rajendran Natham and Gnaesvaran Arunachalam examine the usefulness of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). They compare the MOCA and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) as means to attend to the cognitive status of epilepsy population receiving phenytoin monotherapy. This study suggests that the sensitivity of the MOCA as an assessment tool can help counsellors to identify the clients who have mild cognitive impairment and provide hints for appropriate counselling service. An additional assessment related study in this issue addresses the development of a Japanese version of the Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale (SUIS-J). Yasuko Tanaka, Naoki Yoshinaga, Aki Tsuchiyagaito, Chihiro Sutoh, Daisuke Matsuzawa, Yoshiyuki Hirano, Michiko Nakazato and Eiji Shimizu conducted two studies. In study 1, they translated and validated a Japanese version of Spontaneous Use of Imagery Scale (SUIS-J). In study 2, this scale was rated by people with social anxiety disorders before and after the CBT. Their study examined the relationship between mental imagery and social anxiety symptoms. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF COUNSELLING AND PSYCHOTHERAPY 2018, VOL. 9, NO. 2, 125–126 https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2018.1493372
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
编辑
本期是一系列文章,探讨有效监督,并提供基于案例工作的反思模型,以及额外的实证研究和书评。在本期《亚太咨询和心理治疗杂志》中,来自香港、印度、以色列、加拿大和美国的从业人员从不同角度阐述了他们在咨询和心理疗法方面的想法和经验。无论咨询师和心理治疗师的经验水平如何,都需要监督,使他们能够反思自己的实践,并鼓励批判性的自我护理来维持自己,并与客户有效合作。Karin Jordan建议进行创伤知情咨询监督,尤其是涉及受创伤影响的客户。这种监督模式可以被认为是帮助临床监督人员支持与创伤患者合作的顾问。自我反思是一种核心能力,也是人类服务专业人士认为必不可少的一种属性。Smadar Ben Asher和Nitza Roskin开发了一种结构化的反思工具,这种工具源于心理治疗,并在自我叙事的基础上运作。正如他们在论文中所讨论的,该工具强调对事件的反思性检查、批判性观察、重新概念化和新的行动,可以帮助教育咨询学生在教育或培训过程中对自己的个人和职业发展有反思性的了解。在Ben Asher和Roskin的论文中,采用了定性方法来分析受访者的叙述,并证明了该工具的有效性。对客户需求的评估有助于咨询师和心理治疗师更好地了解客户的情况。Palanisamy Amirthalingam、Rajendran Natham和Gnaeswaran Arunachalam在他们的文章中研究了蒙特利尔认知评估(MOCA)的有用性。他们比较了MOCA和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)作为关注接受苯妥英钠单一治疗的癫痫患者认知状态的手段。本研究表明,MOCA作为一种评估工具的敏感性可以帮助咨询师识别轻度认知障碍的客户,并为适当的咨询服务提供提示。本期的另一项评估相关研究涉及日本版图像自发使用量表(SUIS-J)的开发。田中康子(Yasuko Tanaka)、吉永直树(Naoki Yoshinaga。在研究1中,他们翻译并验证了日语版的《自发使用图像量表》(SUIS-J)。在研究2中,该量表由CBT前后的社交焦虑症患者进行评分。他们的研究考察了心理意象与社交焦虑症状之间的关系。《亚太咨询与心理治疗杂志2018》,第9卷,第2期,125-126https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2018.1493372
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1