Typology and characterization of the pampean beekeeping systems

IF 1.9 Q3 BUSINESS ESIC Market Pub Date : 2020-05-13 DOI:10.7200/esicm.166.0512.2
Tomás Bragulat, E. Angón, A. Giorgis, J. Perea
{"title":"Typology and characterization of the pampean beekeeping systems","authors":"Tomás Bragulat, E. Angón, A. Giorgis, J. Perea","doi":"10.7200/esicm.166.0512.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Identify and characterize the beekeeping systems of La Pampa (Argentina) using multivariate techniques based on the main structural, productive and economic characteristics. Methodology: The data was collected through a random survey of 80 beekeepers. The classification and description of the apicultural systems was based on a multivariate sequence comprising three stages: review and selection of variables, factor analysis and cluster analysis. Results: Factor analysis revealed that the size of the farm and the productive and economic performance of beekeeping jointly explained 66% of the variability. Through cluster analysis, three types of beekeeping have been identified: (i) Subsistence beekeeping grouped 55% of the farms, mainly characterized by small sizes and low productive and economic yields. (ii) Industrial beekeeping concentrated 54% of production in 15% of farms, mainly characterized by large sizes and high productive and economic yields. (iii) Commercial beekeeping grouped 30% of the farms, mainly characterized by high productivity with intermediate sizes. Limitations: The study has been carried out on a few farms due to the difficulty of obtaining answers to all the variables included in the survey. Practical implications: Beekeeping in La Pampa is generally a highly heterogeneous complement of income or family subsistence, with low productivity and low input use. Subsistence beekeeping is a socially relevant system for its contribution to family employment and income in rural areas. Industrial beekeeping is oriented to the export market and has a more competitive scale. Commercial beekeeping is situated on an intermediate scale.","PeriodicalId":41367,"journal":{"name":"ESIC Market","volume":"51 1","pages":"299-318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESIC Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7200/esicm.166.0512.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Identify and characterize the beekeeping systems of La Pampa (Argentina) using multivariate techniques based on the main structural, productive and economic characteristics. Methodology: The data was collected through a random survey of 80 beekeepers. The classification and description of the apicultural systems was based on a multivariate sequence comprising three stages: review and selection of variables, factor analysis and cluster analysis. Results: Factor analysis revealed that the size of the farm and the productive and economic performance of beekeeping jointly explained 66% of the variability. Through cluster analysis, three types of beekeeping have been identified: (i) Subsistence beekeeping grouped 55% of the farms, mainly characterized by small sizes and low productive and economic yields. (ii) Industrial beekeeping concentrated 54% of production in 15% of farms, mainly characterized by large sizes and high productive and economic yields. (iii) Commercial beekeeping grouped 30% of the farms, mainly characterized by high productivity with intermediate sizes. Limitations: The study has been carried out on a few farms due to the difficulty of obtaining answers to all the variables included in the survey. Practical implications: Beekeeping in La Pampa is generally a highly heterogeneous complement of income or family subsistence, with low productivity and low input use. Subsistence beekeeping is a socially relevant system for its contribution to family employment and income in rural areas. Industrial beekeeping is oriented to the export market and has a more competitive scale. Commercial beekeeping is situated on an intermediate scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
潘潘养蜂系统的类型学和特征
目的:根据拉潘帕(阿根廷)的主要结构、生产和经济特征,采用多元技术对其养蜂系统进行识别和表征。方法:数据是通过对80名养蜂人的随机调查收集的。养蜂系统的分类和描述基于多变量序列,包括三个阶段:变量的回顾和选择、因子分析和聚类分析。结果:因子分析表明,农场规模和养蜂的生产经济效益共同解释了66%的变异性。通过聚类分析,确定了三种养蜂类型:(i)自给养蜂占55%的农场,主要特征是规模小、生产和经济产量低。(ii)工业养蜂将54%的产量集中在15%的农场,主要特点是规模大、生产和经济产量高。(iii)商业养蜂占30%的农场,主要特点是中等规模的高生产力。局限性:由于难以获得调查中所有变量的答案,该研究已在少数农场进行。实际意义:拉潘帕的养蜂通常是收入或家庭生计的高度异质性补充,生产力低,投入使用低。自给养蜂是一种与社会相关的制度,因为它对农村地区的家庭就业和收入做出了贡献。工业养蜂以出口市场为导向,规模更具竞争力。商业养蜂处于中等规模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ESIC Market
ESIC Market BUSINESS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Análisis del impacto de los colores y logotipos en el recuerdo de la marca de los clientes paquistaníes The future of human resources role Inflation in Saudi Arabia Development and validation of brand strategies evaluation scale for mobile network users Impacto del burnout en la experiencia del cliente en los centros de atención telefónica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1