Humanities and the Politics of Higher Education in 1980s Popular Culture

Q2 Arts and Humanities History of Humanities Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1086/721314
Marcus Harmes
{"title":"Humanities and the Politics of Higher Education in 1980s Popular Culture","authors":"Marcus Harmes","doi":"10.1086/721314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Conservative government in 1980s Britain made significant cuts to university funding for humanities. This essay examines how responses to these cuts resonated in contemporary television drama set in universities and treats this drama as an important source for interpreting the history of the humanities during the Margaret Thatcher era. The study is embedded in key points of the history of the humanities as disciplines troubled by government policy. It proposes that the points made about both government policy on higher education and the humanities in higher education are multifaceted and nuanced as well as immediate and contemporary, making this form of popular culture an important one for understanding how government actions toward the humanities resonated in popular awareness and how they were received and interpreted. While there was condemnation of government cuts in addition to concomitant defenses of the humanities, drama and its dramatists and producers also identified where exponents of the humanities were weak, sold out, or irrelevant.","PeriodicalId":36904,"journal":{"name":"History of Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Conservative government in 1980s Britain made significant cuts to university funding for humanities. This essay examines how responses to these cuts resonated in contemporary television drama set in universities and treats this drama as an important source for interpreting the history of the humanities during the Margaret Thatcher era. The study is embedded in key points of the history of the humanities as disciplines troubled by government policy. It proposes that the points made about both government policy on higher education and the humanities in higher education are multifaceted and nuanced as well as immediate and contemporary, making this form of popular culture an important one for understanding how government actions toward the humanities resonated in popular awareness and how they were received and interpreted. While there was condemnation of government cuts in addition to concomitant defenses of the humanities, drama and its dramatists and producers also identified where exponents of the humanities were weak, sold out, or irrelevant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人文与80年代大众文化中的高等教育政治
20世纪80年代,英国保守党政府大幅削减了大学对人文学科的资助。本文探讨了对这些删减的回应如何在以大学为背景的当代电视剧中引起共鸣,并将该剧视为解读玛格丽特·撒切尔时代人文史的重要来源。这项研究嵌入了人文学科史的关键点,人文学科是受政府政策困扰的学科。它提出,关于政府的高等教育政策和高等教育中的人文学科的观点都是多方面的、微妙的、直接的和当代的,这使得这种形式的流行文化成为理解政府对人文学科的行动如何在大众意识中产生共鸣以及如何接受和解释这些行动的重要因素。虽然除了对人文学科的辩护外,还有人谴责政府的削减,但戏剧及其剧作家和制片人也发现了人文学科的倡导者在哪里软弱、被出卖或无关紧要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History of Humanities
History of Humanities Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Reading Eric Hayot, Rens Bod, and Lorraine Daston on What the Humanities Do :The Orient in Utrecht: Adriaan Reland (1676–1718), Arabist, Cartographer, Antiquarian and Scholar of Comparative Religion Writing and Reading Today: The History of the Humanities Tomorrow How Diverse Is the History of the Humanities and Does It Matter? Notes on Contributors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1