Past the Anthropocentric: Sociocognitive Perspectives for Tech-Mediated Language Learning

IF 2.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Annual Review of Applied Linguistics Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI:10.1017/S0267190519000114
Maria Ocando Finol
{"title":"Past the Anthropocentric: Sociocognitive Perspectives for Tech-Mediated Language Learning","authors":"Maria Ocando Finol","doi":"10.1017/S0267190519000114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Researchers in second language acquisition (SLA) have long debated the nature of human cognition and how it affects second language learning (L2L). On the one hand, and largely dominating the field of SLA, is the cognitive approach, which focuses on the brain as the unit for cognitive analysis. On the other hand, sociocultural theory holds that human cognition is mediated by cultural artifacts. These perspectives present significantly different views on interaction, understanding it as either auxiliary or instrumental in the learning process, or “fundamentally constitutive” of learning (Mondada & Pekarek Doehler, 2004, p. 502). Increasingly concerned with the role of technology in language learning, current computer-assisted language learning (CALL) research demands theoretical frameworks that account for the ecological relationship between learners, the tools they use, and the environments they inhabit. This article raises the issue of how anthropocentric perspectives on technology have permeated the field of CALL until now, inhibiting its development. I suggest the need for CALL to adopt a less instrumental, more determinist (Carr, 2010) view of the role that technology plays in language learning, by engaging in sociocognitive research (Atkinson, 2010) that embraces the transformative power that technology has over cognition.","PeriodicalId":47490,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Applied Linguistics","volume":"39 1","pages":"146 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0267190519000114","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000114","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Researchers in second language acquisition (SLA) have long debated the nature of human cognition and how it affects second language learning (L2L). On the one hand, and largely dominating the field of SLA, is the cognitive approach, which focuses on the brain as the unit for cognitive analysis. On the other hand, sociocultural theory holds that human cognition is mediated by cultural artifacts. These perspectives present significantly different views on interaction, understanding it as either auxiliary or instrumental in the learning process, or “fundamentally constitutive” of learning (Mondada & Pekarek Doehler, 2004, p. 502). Increasingly concerned with the role of technology in language learning, current computer-assisted language learning (CALL) research demands theoretical frameworks that account for the ecological relationship between learners, the tools they use, and the environments they inhabit. This article raises the issue of how anthropocentric perspectives on technology have permeated the field of CALL until now, inhibiting its development. I suggest the need for CALL to adopt a less instrumental, more determinist (Carr, 2010) view of the role that technology plays in language learning, by engaging in sociocognitive research (Atkinson, 2010) that embraces the transformative power that technology has over cognition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越人类中心:技术中介语言学习的社会认知视角
摘要二语习得研究人员长期以来一直争论人类认知的本质及其对二语学习的影响。一方面,在二语习得领域占据主导地位的是认知方法,它将大脑作为认知分析的单位。另一方面,社会文化理论认为,人类的认知是由文化产物介导的。这些观点对互动提出了显著不同的观点,将其理解为学习过程中的辅助或工具,或学习的“基本构成”(Mondada & Pekarek Doehler, 2004, p. 502)。由于越来越关注技术在语言学习中的作用,当前的计算机辅助语言学习(CALL)研究需要理论框架来解释学习者、他们使用的工具和他们居住的环境之间的生态关系。本文提出了一个问题,即人类中心主义的技术观点如何渗透到CALL领域至今,阻碍了它的发展。我建议CALL需要通过参与社会认知研究(Atkinson, 2010),拥抱技术对认知的变革力量,采用一种较少工具性,更多决定论(Carr, 2010)的观点来看待技术在语言学习中所起的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Applied Linguistics publishes research on key topics in the broad field of applied linguistics. Each issue is thematic, providing a variety of perspectives on the topic through research summaries, critical overviews, position papers and empirical studies. Being responsive to the field, some issues are tied to the theme of that year''s annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Also, at regular intervals an issue will take the approach of covering applied linguistics as a field more broadly, including coverage of critical or controversial topics. ARAL provides cutting-edge and timely articles on a wide number of areas, including language learning and pedagogy, second language acquisition, sociolinguistics, language policy and planning, language assessment, and research design and methodology, to name just a few.
期刊最新文献
Domain-specific research methods in instructed second language acquisition: A next step for research integrity and impact Methodological characteristics in technology-mediated task-based language teaching research: Current practices and future directions Extramural English as an individual difference variable in L2 research: Methodology matters The future of replication in applied linguistics: Toward a standard for replication studies Complex adaptive interventions: The challenge ahead for instructed second language acquisition research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1