Young Terrorists or Child Soldiers? ISIS Children, International Law and Victimhood

IF 1.1 Q2 LAW JOURNAL OF CONFLICT & SECURITY LAW Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1093/jcsl/krz034
Conrad Nyamutata
{"title":"Young Terrorists or Child Soldiers? ISIS Children, International Law and Victimhood","authors":"Conrad Nyamutata","doi":"10.1093/jcsl/krz034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Since the Syrian conflict broke out, a significant number of Western citizens travelled to the warzone to join the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). By common definitions, some of the persons travelled as ‘children’. However, since the defeat of ISIS, Western countries are facing a conundrum on how to treat these young former fighters. The status of these children has been contentious. Among the Western countries, there does not seem to be a clear position or consistent approach on how such children should be treated. It would appear that the approaches towards the dilemma on these young persons have, predominantly, been dictated by the political whims of individual states. Generally, the children have been regarded as young ‘terrorists’ likely to pose danger to Western societies if repatriated back. However, the perceptions and actions towards these minors seem to depart from the normative approaches to children associated with armed conflict. The widely reported case of British teenager Shamima Begum shone the spotlight on the predicaments of children formerly associated with ISIS. This article makes a case for the treatment of ISIS-associated children to be considered as child soldiers. When analysed closely, these children deserve protections accorded to all children recruited for purposes of warfare. Recent case law seems to imply that such protection does not cease even after the age of 18 years. All considered, the denial of repatriation appears inimical to normative standards on children associated with armed conflict. Furthermore, the approaches of some of the Western countries could be vulnerable to criticism for violation of the rule of law. The arbitrary revocation of citizenship and barring of returns appear starkly in conflict with norms of natural justice. With this in mind, this article asserts that a consistent approach would require the Western approaches to treat ISIS-associated children as victims first and accord them protections recognised in international law.","PeriodicalId":43908,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CONFLICT & SECURITY LAW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/jcsl/krz034","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CONFLICT & SECURITY LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krz034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Since the Syrian conflict broke out, a significant number of Western citizens travelled to the warzone to join the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). By common definitions, some of the persons travelled as ‘children’. However, since the defeat of ISIS, Western countries are facing a conundrum on how to treat these young former fighters. The status of these children has been contentious. Among the Western countries, there does not seem to be a clear position or consistent approach on how such children should be treated. It would appear that the approaches towards the dilemma on these young persons have, predominantly, been dictated by the political whims of individual states. Generally, the children have been regarded as young ‘terrorists’ likely to pose danger to Western societies if repatriated back. However, the perceptions and actions towards these minors seem to depart from the normative approaches to children associated with armed conflict. The widely reported case of British teenager Shamima Begum shone the spotlight on the predicaments of children formerly associated with ISIS. This article makes a case for the treatment of ISIS-associated children to be considered as child soldiers. When analysed closely, these children deserve protections accorded to all children recruited for purposes of warfare. Recent case law seems to imply that such protection does not cease even after the age of 18 years. All considered, the denial of repatriation appears inimical to normative standards on children associated with armed conflict. Furthermore, the approaches of some of the Western countries could be vulnerable to criticism for violation of the rule of law. The arbitrary revocation of citizenship and barring of returns appear starkly in conflict with norms of natural justice. With this in mind, this article asserts that a consistent approach would require the Western approaches to treat ISIS-associated children as victims first and accord them protections recognised in international law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻恐怖分子还是儿童兵?ISIS儿童,国际法和受害者
自叙利亚冲突爆发以来,大量西方公民前往战区加入伊拉克和叙利亚伊斯兰国(ISIS)。根据常见的定义,有些人是以“儿童”身份旅行的。然而,自从ISIS被击败以来,西方国家面临着如何对待这些年轻的前战士的难题。这些儿童的地位一直存在争议。在西方国家中,似乎没有明确的立场或一致的方法来对待这些儿童。看来,解决这些年轻人困境的方法主要是由各个国家的政治奇思妙想决定的。一般来说,这些儿童被视为年轻的“恐怖分子”,如果遣返,可能会对西方社会构成危险。然而,对这些未成年人的看法和行动似乎偏离了对与武装冲突有关的儿童的规范做法。被广泛报道的英国青少年沙米玛·贝古姆的案件使人们关注到以前与ISIS有关联的儿童的困境。这篇文章提出了将与伊斯兰国有关联的儿童视为儿童兵的理由。如果仔细分析,这些儿童应该得到保护,所有为战争目的招募的儿童都应该得到保护。最近的判例法似乎暗示,这种保护即使在18岁之后也不会停止。综合考虑,拒绝遣返似乎不符合关于与武装冲突有关的儿童的规范性标准。此外,一些西方国家的做法可能容易受到违反法治的批评。任意撤销公民身份和禁止遣返似乎与自然正义准则背道而驰。考虑到这一点,这篇文章断言,一个一致的方法将需要西方方法首先将与ISIS有关的儿童视为受害者,并给予他们国际法承认的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Journal of Conflict & Security Law is a thrice yearly refereed journal aimed at academics, government officials, military lawyers and lawyers working in the area, as well as individuals interested in the areas of arms control law, the law of armed conflict (international humanitarian law) and collective security law. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of international law relating to armed conflict from the pre-conflict stage when the issues include those of arms control, disarmament, and conflict prevention and discussions of the legality of the resort to force, through to the outbreak of armed conflict when attention turns to the coverage of the conduct of military operations and the protection of non-combatants by international humanitarian law.
期刊最新文献
The practice of non-recognition and economic sanctions: The case study of Ukraine, Manchuria and South Africa Roadblocks to Disarmament in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty System Recent Developments in the National Implementation of Biological Weapons Convention: What Happened Since Resolution 1540? Why Prosecuting Aggression in Ukraine as a Crime Against Humanity Might Make Sense From Theory to Reality: A Definition for the Termination of Non-International Armed Conflicts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1