Drinking from a Full Cup: Race, Racism, and Discrimination in Contemporary Social Psychological Research

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Social Psychology Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-08-19 DOI:10.1177/01902725231191643
Corey D. Fields, V. Keith, Justine E. Tinkler
{"title":"Drinking from a Full Cup: Race, Racism, and Discrimination in Contemporary Social Psychological Research","authors":"Corey D. Fields, V. Keith, Justine E. Tinkler","doi":"10.1177/01902725231191643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When we embarked on editing a special issue of Social Psychology Quarterly focused on race, we came to the project with a heady mix of excitement and curiosity, along with a dash of anxiety. We were excited at the prospect of seeing— and helping to shape—how research in sociological social psychology was tackling this important topic. We were curious to see how the field had developed in this area since the groundbreaking special edition of SPQ 20 years ago. And, honestly, we were a little anxious that perhaps there had not been much growth or development in how social psychologists were asking and answering questions about race, racism, and discrimination. Looking back, our excitement and curiosity proved warranted, and our anxieties were misdirected. The call for papers yielded a robust and vibrant body of research being carried out by scholars from a diverse range of career stages, institutions, backgrounds, and methodological orientations. Sociologists are producing a rich body of social psychological research grappling with questions of racial formation, racial discrimination, and race relations more broadly. Going into this process, we shared similar goals to our predecessor from 2003. We also wanted to select papers that bridged various subfields and drew from a broad range of methodological approaches. We hoped that the volume would attend to a wide range of experiences across different racial groups. And it was critical that papers did not all come from a White, ‘‘normative’’ frame of reference. These initial goals were easily met. The pool of submissions for this issue illustrated just how deeply the lessons of the 2003 special issue have shaped our subfield and structured the trajectory of social psychological research. We expanded our goals to include work that uses the topic of race to reconceptualize social psychological ideas. We also selected pieces that use social psychological theories and methods to broaden our","PeriodicalId":48201,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology Quarterly","volume":"86 1","pages":"214 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725231191643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When we embarked on editing a special issue of Social Psychology Quarterly focused on race, we came to the project with a heady mix of excitement and curiosity, along with a dash of anxiety. We were excited at the prospect of seeing— and helping to shape—how research in sociological social psychology was tackling this important topic. We were curious to see how the field had developed in this area since the groundbreaking special edition of SPQ 20 years ago. And, honestly, we were a little anxious that perhaps there had not been much growth or development in how social psychologists were asking and answering questions about race, racism, and discrimination. Looking back, our excitement and curiosity proved warranted, and our anxieties were misdirected. The call for papers yielded a robust and vibrant body of research being carried out by scholars from a diverse range of career stages, institutions, backgrounds, and methodological orientations. Sociologists are producing a rich body of social psychological research grappling with questions of racial formation, racial discrimination, and race relations more broadly. Going into this process, we shared similar goals to our predecessor from 2003. We also wanted to select papers that bridged various subfields and drew from a broad range of methodological approaches. We hoped that the volume would attend to a wide range of experiences across different racial groups. And it was critical that papers did not all come from a White, ‘‘normative’’ frame of reference. These initial goals were easily met. The pool of submissions for this issue illustrated just how deeply the lessons of the 2003 special issue have shaped our subfield and structured the trajectory of social psychological research. We expanded our goals to include work that uses the topic of race to reconceptualize social psychological ideas. We also selected pieces that use social psychological theories and methods to broaden our
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
满杯饮酒:当代社会心理研究中的种族、种族主义和歧视
当我们开始编辑一期以种族为重点的《社会心理学季刊》特刊时,我们怀着兴奋和好奇的兴奋心情,以及一丝焦虑来到了这个项目。我们很高兴看到——并帮助塑造——社会学社会心理学研究如何解决这一重要话题。我们很好奇,自20年前开创性的SPQ特别版以来,该领域在这一领域是如何发展的。老实说,我们有点担心,也许社会心理学家在询问和回答有关种族、种族主义和歧视的问题方面没有太大的增长或发展。回过头来看,我们的兴奋和好奇被证明是有道理的,我们的焦虑被误导了。对论文的呼吁产生了一个强大而充满活力的研究体系,由来自不同职业阶段、机构、背景和方法取向的学者进行。社会学家正在进行大量的社会心理学研究,以更广泛地解决种族形成、种族歧视和种族关系等问题。在这一进程中,我们与2003年的前任有着相似的目标。我们还希望选择跨越各个子领域并借鉴广泛方法论方法的论文。我们希望这本书能涉及不同种族群体的广泛经历。至关重要的是,论文并非都来自白人的“格式化”参考框架。这些最初的目标很容易实现。这期特刊的大量投稿表明,2003年特刊的教训对我们的子领域产生了多么深刻的影响,并构建了社会心理学研究的轨迹。我们扩大了我们的目标,包括利用种族主题重新定义社会心理思想的工作。我们还选择了使用社会心理学理论和方法来拓宽我们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Psychology Quarterly
Social Psychology Quarterly PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: SPPS is a unique short reports journal in social and personality psychology. Its aim is to publish cutting-edge, short reports of single studies, or very succinct reports of multiple studies, and will be geared toward a speedy review and publication process to allow groundbreaking research to be quickly available to the field. Preferences will be given to articles that •have theoretical and practical significance •represent an advance to social psychological or personality science •will be of broad interest both within and outside of social and personality psychology •are written to be intelligible to a wide range of readers including science writers for the popular press
期刊最新文献
Scrutinizing Justice in Sociology: Inspiration From Social Psychology Introduction of Karen A. Hegtvedt, Winner of the 2023 Cooley-Mead Award The Job Satisfaction Paradox: Pluralistic Ignorance and the Myth of the “Unhappy Worker” When Good News Falls Flat: Complications in the Delivery and Reception of Good News in Pediatric Neurology The Magic Word? Face-Work and the Functions of Please in Everyday Requests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1