Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) for the Treatment of Anal Fistula: A Prospective Observational Study

Q4 Medicine Journal of Coloproctology Pub Date : 2022-12-12 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1764195
L. A. Hidalgo-Grau, N. Ruiz-Edo, O. Estrada-Ferrer, E. M. García-Torralbo, M. del Bas-Rubia, P. Clos-Ferrero, E. Bombuy-Giménez
{"title":"Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) for the Treatment of Anal Fistula: A Prospective Observational Study","authors":"L. A. Hidalgo-Grau, N. Ruiz-Edo, O. Estrada-Ferrer, E. M. García-Torralbo, M. del Bas-Rubia, P. Clos-Ferrero, E. Bombuy-Giménez","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1764195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background  The ligation of intersphincteric fistula fract (LIFT) technique avoids postoperative anal continence disturbances and preserves quality of life. Methods  A total of 70 patients with anal fistula (AF) were treated in the Day Surgery Unit. The LIFT technique was the primary treatment in 63 patients. The other had previously undergone placement of a loose seton (two-step approach). The mean follow-up was 66.8 months. Statistical analysis was performed using contingency tables, the chi-square test, and the Student T-test. Results  The use of LIFT was successful in 40 patients (57.1%). However, 6 patients (8.6%) presented persistence of postoperative intersphincteric fistula, being successfully treated by fistulotomy. There were no differences in this technique's success rate between high and low AF ( p  = 0.45). The success rate of one-step LIFT, however, was significantly higher ( p  = 0.03). No disturbances of continence were observed. Conclusions  The LIFT technique has a role in the treatment of AF, is suitable for ambulatory surgery, and has a low complications rate. A two-step approach is not always needed.","PeriodicalId":15408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Coloproctology","volume":"43 1","pages":"024 - 029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background  The ligation of intersphincteric fistula fract (LIFT) technique avoids postoperative anal continence disturbances and preserves quality of life. Methods  A total of 70 patients with anal fistula (AF) were treated in the Day Surgery Unit. The LIFT technique was the primary treatment in 63 patients. The other had previously undergone placement of a loose seton (two-step approach). The mean follow-up was 66.8 months. Statistical analysis was performed using contingency tables, the chi-square test, and the Student T-test. Results  The use of LIFT was successful in 40 patients (57.1%). However, 6 patients (8.6%) presented persistence of postoperative intersphincteric fistula, being successfully treated by fistulotomy. There were no differences in this technique's success rate between high and low AF ( p  = 0.45). The success rate of one-step LIFT, however, was significantly higher ( p  = 0.03). No disturbances of continence were observed. Conclusions  The LIFT technique has a role in the treatment of AF, is suitable for ambulatory surgery, and has a low complications rate. A two-step approach is not always needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
括约肌间瘘道结扎术治疗肛瘘:一项前瞻性观察研究
摘要背景 括约肌间瘘断裂结扎(LIFT)技术避免了术后肛门失禁障碍,并保持了生活质量。方法 共有70名肛瘘患者在日间手术室接受治疗。LIFT技术是63例患者的主要治疗方法。另一个之前曾进行过松套放置(两步法)。平均随访66.8个月。使用列联表、卡方检验和Student T检验进行统计分析。后果 40例(57.1%)患者成功使用LIFT,但6例(8.6%)患者术后出现持续性乳头间瘘,经瘘管切开术成功治疗。该技术的成功率在高AF和低AF之间没有差异(p = 0.45)。然而,一步LIFT的成功率显著更高(p = 0.03)。未观察到失禁的干扰。结论 LIFT技术在房颤的治疗中发挥作用,适用于门诊手术,并发症发生率低。并非总是需要两步走的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Coloproctology
Journal of Coloproctology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Salvia officinalis in the Treatment of Acetic Acid-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in a Rat Model Unusual Case of Colonic Intussusception Caused by Angiolipoma: Case Report and Literature Review Vegetating Lesions that Appear in the Scar after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Tumors: Tumor Regrowth or Benign Neoplasm? Retrospective Study of Patients Submitted to Appendectomy in a Tertiary Hospital: Is There a Difference between the Public and Supplementary Health System? Pilonidal Sinus of the Anal Canal: A Rare Entity - Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1