Examining the impact of government spending on the finance-growth nexus: evidence from post-communist economies

IF 2.2 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Post-Communist Economies Pub Date : 2021-12-05 DOI:10.1080/14631377.2021.2006491
Hazwan Haini, Pang Wei Loon
{"title":"Examining the impact of government spending on the finance-growth nexus: evidence from post-communist economies","authors":"Hazwan Haini, Pang Wei Loon","doi":"10.1080/14631377.2021.2006491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examines the impact of government spending on the finance-growth nexus in 27 post-communist economies from 1995 to 2017 using dynamic panel estimators. Many transitional economies have attempted to reduce the influence of government intervention during their early transitional period while reforming their respective financial sectors. The findings show that overall financial development is positive to growth, while government spending has a negative impact on growth. More importantly, the marginal effects of financial development are positive to growth at low levels of government spending. In contrast, at high levels of government spending, financial development has a negative relationship to growth. Focusing on different aspects of financial development, the findings show that financial access and efficiency are more effective at stimulating growth compared to financial depth. Post-communist economies should ensure that government spending should not crowd out the financial sector, and promote financial efficiency and accessibility.","PeriodicalId":46517,"journal":{"name":"Post-Communist Economies","volume":"34 1","pages":"756 - 778"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Communist Economies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.2006491","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the impact of government spending on the finance-growth nexus in 27 post-communist economies from 1995 to 2017 using dynamic panel estimators. Many transitional economies have attempted to reduce the influence of government intervention during their early transitional period while reforming their respective financial sectors. The findings show that overall financial development is positive to growth, while government spending has a negative impact on growth. More importantly, the marginal effects of financial development are positive to growth at low levels of government spending. In contrast, at high levels of government spending, financial development has a negative relationship to growth. Focusing on different aspects of financial development, the findings show that financial access and efficiency are more effective at stimulating growth compared to financial depth. Post-communist economies should ensure that government spending should not crowd out the financial sector, and promote financial efficiency and accessibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考察政府支出对金融增长关系的影响:来自后共产主义经济体的证据
摘要本研究使用动态面板估计量考察了1995-2017年27个后共产主义经济体政府支出对金融增长关系的影响。许多转型经济体在转型初期试图减少政府干预的影响,同时改革各自的金融部门。研究结果表明,总体金融发展对经济增长是积极的,而政府支出对经济增长有负面影响。更重要的是,在政府支出水平较低的情况下,金融发展的边际效应对经济增长是积极的。相比之下,在高水平的政府支出下,金融发展与增长呈负相关。关注金融发展的不同方面,研究结果表明,与金融深度相比,金融准入和效率在刺激增长方面更有效。后共产主义经济体应确保政府支出不应排挤金融部门,并提高金融效率和可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Post-Communist Economies publishes key research and policy articles in the analysis of post-communist economies. The basic transformation in the past two decades through stabilisation, liberalisation and privatisation has been completed in virtually all of the former communist countries, but despite the dramatic changes that have taken place, the post-communist economies still form a clearly identifiable group, distinguished by the impact of the years of communist rule. Post-communist economies still present distinctive problems that make them a particular focus of research.
期刊最新文献
European integration and economic growth in emerging Europe: the role of institutions and policy factors External debt burden and economic growth: evidence from Central Asia The impact of special economic zones on industrial enterprises’ productivity in Russia Does one good turn deserve another? Evidence from China’s trade and aid policy Can SEE economies grow stronger together? Empirical evidence from the CEFTA region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1