Extinction in the anthropocene and moving toward an ethic of responsibility

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW Griffith Law Review Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1080/10383441.2020.1924951
Paul J. Govind
{"title":"Extinction in the anthropocene and moving toward an ethic of responsibility","authors":"Paul J. Govind","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2020.1924951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article addresses extinction and the need for ethical change within our legal system. The article evaluates this issue in the context of law that mediates humanity's use and management of land and by extension the more-than-human species that we share the land with. Humanity frames its relationship with land through property. Whilst land, and the different species, ecosystems and formations that inhabit it represents a physical and material state of being, property exists in a dephysicalised state. Dephysicalisation does not allow humanity to recognise the ontological vulnerability that it is experiencing in concert with the more-than-human species that share the planet and is blinding our legal regimes to the reality of the extinction crisis that is upon us. This is an ethical challenge. I argue that decelerating the extinction crisis in the Anthropocene requires that the exercise of rights is tempered by responsibility. I explain the relationship between dephysical property rights, responsibility and extinction on the backdrop of the Anthropocene using the related concepts of space and place. In contrast to rights that have an abstract and disembodied quality, an ethic of responsibility necessitates that humanity adopt a position where place is mutually constructed by humanity and more-than-human species.","PeriodicalId":45376,"journal":{"name":"Griffith Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10383441.2020.1924951","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Griffith Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2020.1924951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article addresses extinction and the need for ethical change within our legal system. The article evaluates this issue in the context of law that mediates humanity's use and management of land and by extension the more-than-human species that we share the land with. Humanity frames its relationship with land through property. Whilst land, and the different species, ecosystems and formations that inhabit it represents a physical and material state of being, property exists in a dephysicalised state. Dephysicalisation does not allow humanity to recognise the ontological vulnerability that it is experiencing in concert with the more-than-human species that share the planet and is blinding our legal regimes to the reality of the extinction crisis that is upon us. This is an ethical challenge. I argue that decelerating the extinction crisis in the Anthropocene requires that the exercise of rights is tempered by responsibility. I explain the relationship between dephysical property rights, responsibility and extinction on the backdrop of the Anthropocene using the related concepts of space and place. In contrast to rights that have an abstract and disembodied quality, an ethic of responsibility necessitates that humanity adopt a position where place is mutually constructed by humanity and more-than-human species.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类世的灭绝和走向责任伦理
摘要本文论述了我们法律体系中的灭绝和道德变革的必要性。本文在法律的背景下评估了这个问题,该法律调解了人类对土地的使用和管理,进而调解了我们共享土地的不仅仅是人类物种。人类通过财产来界定其与土地的关系。虽然土地以及居住在其中的不同物种、生态系统和地层代表着一种物理和物质存在状态,但财产是以一种非物理状态存在的。去物理化不允许人类认识到它正在经历的本体论脆弱性,而这种脆弱性与共享地球的人类物种一致,并使我们的法律制度对即将到来的灭绝危机的现实视而不见。这是一个伦理挑战。我认为,减缓人类世的灭绝危机需要责任来缓和权利的行使。我运用空间和地点的相关概念,在人类世的背景下解释了非物质产权、责任和灭绝之间的关系。与具有抽象和无实体性质的权利相比,责任伦理要求人类采取一种由人类而非人类物种共同构建的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Reconceptualising the crimes of Big Tech The current legal regime of the Indonesian outer small islands Mainstreaming climate change in legal education Skeletons in the cupboard: reading settler anxiety in Mabo and Love Post-enlargement (free) movement in the EU: who really counts as EU CITIZEN? understanding Dano through the lens of Orientalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1