Contributions of the Liturgical Renewal Movement and Concerns for the Future Renewal of Liturgy

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Liturgy Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/0458063x.2022.2154515
HyeRan Kim-Cragg
{"title":"Contributions of the Liturgical Renewal Movement and Concerns for the Future Renewal of Liturgy","authors":"HyeRan Kim-Cragg","doi":"10.1080/0458063x.2022.2154515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My liturgical homeland includes Korean Roman Catholicism and Presbyterianism as well as Canadian Methodist and Reformed traditions. I teach at a Canadian theological school that was founded by the ancestors of the United Church of Canada, who had a vision for church unity between Methodist, Presbyterian, and Congregationalist congregations in 1925. My offering in this article projecting the next fifty years of liturgical scholarship and worship practice emerges out of these limited experiences, rooted in ecumenism, honoring different theological traditions and liturgical practices, while seeking to be whole. My vision of worship is that it is always reforming as it calls a healthy and vibrant body of Christ to witness God’s work in the world. I begin by highlighting the contributions of the Liturgical Renewal Movement (LRM), initiated by the Second Vatican Council which inspired many Protestant worshiping assemblies. It is fruitful to ground our discussion in a review of the past contributions before we venture a word about a future liturgical renewal. I name three contributions here, which inform concerns for liturgical studies. Raising these concerns will serve as an attempt to chart trajectories into the future of liturgical studies and worship practices. In conclusion, I will identify one major obstacle to overcome.","PeriodicalId":53923,"journal":{"name":"Liturgy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liturgy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0458063x.2022.2154515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

My liturgical homeland includes Korean Roman Catholicism and Presbyterianism as well as Canadian Methodist and Reformed traditions. I teach at a Canadian theological school that was founded by the ancestors of the United Church of Canada, who had a vision for church unity between Methodist, Presbyterian, and Congregationalist congregations in 1925. My offering in this article projecting the next fifty years of liturgical scholarship and worship practice emerges out of these limited experiences, rooted in ecumenism, honoring different theological traditions and liturgical practices, while seeking to be whole. My vision of worship is that it is always reforming as it calls a healthy and vibrant body of Christ to witness God’s work in the world. I begin by highlighting the contributions of the Liturgical Renewal Movement (LRM), initiated by the Second Vatican Council which inspired many Protestant worshiping assemblies. It is fruitful to ground our discussion in a review of the past contributions before we venture a word about a future liturgical renewal. I name three contributions here, which inform concerns for liturgical studies. Raising these concerns will serve as an attempt to chart trajectories into the future of liturgical studies and worship practices. In conclusion, I will identify one major obstacle to overcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
礼仪更新运动的贡献及对未来礼仪更新的关注
我的宗教信仰包括朝鲜罗马天主教和长老会以及加拿大卫理公会和改革宗传统。我在加拿大的一所神学院教书,这所学校是由加拿大联合教会的祖先们创立的,他们在1925年提出了卫理公会、长老会和公理会教会团结的愿景。我在这篇文章中对未来五十年礼仪学术和敬拜实践的展望是从这些有限的经验中产生的,植根于普世主义,尊重不同的神学传统和礼仪实践,同时寻求整体。我对敬拜的看法是,它总是在改革,因为它呼召一个健康和充满活力的基督身体来见证上帝在世界上的工作。我首先强调礼仪更新运动(LRM)的贡献,该运动由梵蒂冈第二届大公会议发起,启发了许多新教礼拜集会。在我们大胆地谈论未来礼仪的更新之前,将我们的讨论建立在回顾过去的贡献的基础上是富有成效的。我在这里列举了三个贡献,它们为礼仪研究提供了信息。提出这些关注将作为一种尝试,为未来的礼仪研究和敬拜实践绘制轨迹。最后,我将指出一个需要克服的主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Liturgy
Liturgy RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Taizé: Brand or Anti-Brand? UnMute Yourself: Musings on the Obstacles of Worship’s Impact on Ethics When a Brand is Tainted: The Ethics of Song Selection in Corporate Worship “What Is Not Assumed Is Not Redeemed”: Worship Lifestyle Branding at Bethel Church UnMute Yourself: Surfing the Synthesis of the Academic and Pastoral
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1