An Investigation of the Impact of Jagged Profile on L2 Speaking Test Ratings: Evidence from Rating and Eye-tracking Data

IF 1.4 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Assessment Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-06-12 DOI:10.1080/15434303.2022.2078720
Wenyue Ma, Paula M. Winke
{"title":"An Investigation of the Impact of Jagged Profile on L2 Speaking Test Ratings: Evidence from Rating and Eye-tracking Data","authors":"Wenyue Ma, Paula M. Winke","doi":"10.1080/15434303.2022.2078720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The factors that influence rater scoring have been a subject of great interest to researchers in second language assessment. However, the research on the impact of test-takers’ speech profiles (e.g., a jagged or a flat profile reflecting analytic subscores) on raters’ scoring behaviors remains to be seen. To investigate the role of speech profiles in scoring, we collected analytic and holistic rating scores from 28 trained raters while they were marking the performances of three groups of speakers with distinct profiles, determined by prior ratings. We tracked eleven of the raters’ eye-movements to record how often and how long they looked at the various categories on the rating scales. We found that the raters perceived speakers who have better pronunciation as overall more competent speakers. Meanwhile, speakers’ score profiles influenced raters’ attention: raters fixated longer and more often, and made more eye-visits, to the lexical grammar category while assessing speakers with a jagged profile. Raters spent less time assessing the pronunciation of the speakers who were pre-identified as having better pronunciation. The findings shed light on the impact of speech characteristics on raters’ cognition and score assignments and therefore have important implications for rater training in L2 speaking assessments.","PeriodicalId":46873,"journal":{"name":"Language Assessment Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Assessment Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2078720","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT The factors that influence rater scoring have been a subject of great interest to researchers in second language assessment. However, the research on the impact of test-takers’ speech profiles (e.g., a jagged or a flat profile reflecting analytic subscores) on raters’ scoring behaviors remains to be seen. To investigate the role of speech profiles in scoring, we collected analytic and holistic rating scores from 28 trained raters while they were marking the performances of three groups of speakers with distinct profiles, determined by prior ratings. We tracked eleven of the raters’ eye-movements to record how often and how long they looked at the various categories on the rating scales. We found that the raters perceived speakers who have better pronunciation as overall more competent speakers. Meanwhile, speakers’ score profiles influenced raters’ attention: raters fixated longer and more often, and made more eye-visits, to the lexical grammar category while assessing speakers with a jagged profile. Raters spent less time assessing the pronunciation of the speakers who were pre-identified as having better pronunciation. The findings shed light on the impact of speech characteristics on raters’ cognition and score assignments and therefore have important implications for rater training in L2 speaking assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锯齿形轮廓对二语口语测试评分影响的研究:来自评分和眼动数据的证据
影响评分者评分的因素一直是第二语言评估研究人员非常感兴趣的课题。然而,关于考生的语音特征(例如,反映分析子分数的锯齿状或扁平特征)对评分者评分行为的影响的研究仍有待观察。为了研究语音特征在评分中的作用,我们收集了28名训练有素的评分员在给三组不同语音特征的说话者的表现打分时的分析和整体评分分数。我们追踪了11位评分者的眼球运动,记录他们看评分表上不同类别的频率和时长。我们发现,评分者认为发音更好的人总体上更有能力。与此同时,说话者的评分概况影响了评分者的注意力:评分者在用参差不齐的评分概况评估说话者时,对词汇语法类别的关注时间更长、更频繁,而且目光更多。评分者花更少的时间来评估那些预先被认为发音更好的说话者的发音。研究结果揭示了言语特征对评分者认知和评分分配的影响,因此对二语口语评估中的评分者培训具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Argument-Based Validation in Testing and Assessment The Diagnosis of Writing in a Second or Foreign Language The Role of Gazing Behaviors in Navigating Paired Role-Play Interactional Competence Assessment Tasks Twenty Years of Language Assessment Quarterly: An Interview with LAQ Founder Antony Kunnan Fundamental Considerations in Technology Mediated Language Assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1