Patterns and correlates of patient‐reported helpfulness of treatment for common mental and substance use disorders in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys

IF 60.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY World Psychiatry Pub Date : 2022-05-07 DOI:10.1002/wps.20971
R. Kessler, A. Kazdin, S. Aguilar-Gaxiola, A. Al-Hamzawi, J. Alonso, Y. Altwaijri, L. Andrade, C. Benjet, C. Bharat, G. Borges, R. Bruffaerts, B. Bunting, J. C. Almeida, G. Cardoso, W. Chiu, A. Cía, M. Ciutan, L. Degenhardt, G. Girolamo, P. Jonge, Ymkje Anna de Vries, S. Florescu, O. Gureje, J. Haro, M. Harris, Chi‐yi Hu, A. Karam, E. Karam, G. Karam, N. Kawakami, A. Kiejna, V. Kovess-Masfety, Sing Lee, V. Makanjuola, J. Mcgrath, M. Medina-Mora, J. Moskalewicz, F. Navarro-Mateu, A. Nierenberg, D. Nishi, A. Ojagbemi, B. Oladeji, Siobhan O'Neill, J. Posada-Villa, V. Puac-Polanco, C. Rapsey, A. M. Ruscio, N. Sampson, K. Scott, T. Slade, J. C. Stagnaro, Dan J Stein, H. Tachimori, M. Have, Y. Torres, M. Viana, D. Vigo, David R. Williams, B. Wojtyniak, M. Xavier, Z. Zarkov, H. Ziobrowski
{"title":"Patterns and correlates of patient‐reported helpfulness of treatment for common mental and substance use disorders in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys","authors":"R. Kessler, A. Kazdin, S. Aguilar-Gaxiola, A. Al-Hamzawi, J. Alonso, Y. Altwaijri, L. Andrade, C. Benjet, C. Bharat, G. Borges, R. Bruffaerts, B. Bunting, J. C. Almeida, G. Cardoso, W. Chiu, A. Cía, M. Ciutan, L. Degenhardt, G. Girolamo, P. Jonge, Ymkje Anna de Vries, S. Florescu, O. Gureje, J. Haro, M. Harris, Chi‐yi Hu, A. Karam, E. Karam, G. Karam, N. Kawakami, A. Kiejna, V. Kovess-Masfety, Sing Lee, V. Makanjuola, J. Mcgrath, M. Medina-Mora, J. Moskalewicz, F. Navarro-Mateu, A. Nierenberg, D. Nishi, A. Ojagbemi, B. Oladeji, Siobhan O'Neill, J. Posada-Villa, V. Puac-Polanco, C. Rapsey, A. M. Ruscio, N. Sampson, K. Scott, T. Slade, J. C. Stagnaro, Dan J Stein, H. Tachimori, M. Have, Y. Torres, M. Viana, D. Vigo, David R. Williams, B. Wojtyniak, M. Xavier, Z. Zarkov, H. Ziobrowski","doi":"10.1002/wps.20971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient‐reported helpfulness of treatment is an important indicator of quality in patient‐centered care. We examined its pathways and predictors among respondents to household surveys who reported ever receiving treatment for major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, specific phobia, post‐traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, or alcohol use disorder. Data came from 30 community epidemiological surveys – 17 in high‐income countries (HICs) and 13 in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) – carried out as part of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys. Respondents were asked whether treatment of each disorder was ever helpful and, if so, the number of professionals seen before receiving helpful treatment. Across all surveys and diagnostic categories, 26.1% of patients (N=10,035) reported being helped by the very first professional they saw. Persisting to a second professional after a first unhelpful treatment brought the cumulative probability of receiving helpful treatment to 51.2%. If patients persisted with up through eight professionals, the cumulative probability rose to 90.6%. However, only an estimated 22.8% of patients would have persisted in seeing these many professionals after repeatedly receiving treatments they considered not helpful. Although the proportion of individuals with disorders who sought treatment was higher and they were more persistent in HICs than LMICs, proportional helpfulness among treated cases was no different between HICs and LMICs. A wide range of predictors of perceived treatment helpfulness were found, some of them consistent across diagnostic categories and others unique to specific disorders. These results provide novel information about patient evaluations of treatment across diagnoses and countries varying in income level, and suggest that a critical issue in improving the quality of care for mental disorders should be fostering persistence in professional help‐seeking if earlier treatments are not helpful.","PeriodicalId":49357,"journal":{"name":"World Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":60.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20971","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Patient‐reported helpfulness of treatment is an important indicator of quality in patient‐centered care. We examined its pathways and predictors among respondents to household surveys who reported ever receiving treatment for major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, specific phobia, post‐traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, or alcohol use disorder. Data came from 30 community epidemiological surveys – 17 in high‐income countries (HICs) and 13 in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) – carried out as part of the World Health Organization (WHO)’s World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys. Respondents were asked whether treatment of each disorder was ever helpful and, if so, the number of professionals seen before receiving helpful treatment. Across all surveys and diagnostic categories, 26.1% of patients (N=10,035) reported being helped by the very first professional they saw. Persisting to a second professional after a first unhelpful treatment brought the cumulative probability of receiving helpful treatment to 51.2%. If patients persisted with up through eight professionals, the cumulative probability rose to 90.6%. However, only an estimated 22.8% of patients would have persisted in seeing these many professionals after repeatedly receiving treatments they considered not helpful. Although the proportion of individuals with disorders who sought treatment was higher and they were more persistent in HICs than LMICs, proportional helpfulness among treated cases was no different between HICs and LMICs. A wide range of predictors of perceived treatment helpfulness were found, some of them consistent across diagnostic categories and others unique to specific disorders. These results provide novel information about patient evaluations of treatment across diagnoses and countries varying in income level, and suggest that a critical issue in improving the quality of care for mental disorders should be fostering persistence in professional help‐seeking if earlier treatments are not helpful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世卫组织世界精神卫生调查中患者报告的对治疗常见精神和物质使用障碍的帮助程度的模式和相关因素
患者报告的治疗有用性是以患者为中心的护理质量的重要指标。我们在家庭调查的受访者中研究了其途径和预测因素,这些受访者报告曾接受过严重抑郁症、广泛性焦虑症、社交恐惧症、特定恐惧症、创伤后应激障碍、双相情感障碍或酒精使用障碍的治疗。数据来自30项社区流行病学调查——17项在高收入国家(HIC),13项在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)——作为世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)世界心理健康(WMH)调查的一部分。受访者被问及每种疾病的治疗是否有帮助,如果有,在接受有益治疗之前,有多少专业人员就诊。在所有调查和诊断类别中,26.1%的患者(N=10035)报告说,他们看到的第一位专业人士就帮助了他们。在第一次无效治疗后,坚持第二位专业人员治疗,使患者获得有效治疗的累计概率达到51.2%。如果患者坚持使用八位专业人员,累计概率上升至90.6%。然而,据估计,只有22.8%的患者在反复接受他们认为没有帮助的治疗后,会坚持去看这么多专业人士。尽管与LMIC相比,患有疾病的患者寻求治疗的比例更高,并且他们在HIC中更持久,但HIC和LMIC之间治疗病例的帮助比例没有什么不同。发现了一系列感知治疗有用性的预测因素,其中一些在诊断类别中是一致的,另一些则是特定疾病特有的。这些结果提供了关于不同诊断和收入水平国家的患者治疗评估的新信息,并表明,如果早期治疗没有帮助,提高精神障碍护理质量的一个关键问题应该是培养持续寻求专业帮助的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Psychiatry
World Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
自引率
7.40%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: World Psychiatry is the official journal of the World Psychiatric Association. It is published in three issues per year. The journal is sent free of charge to psychiatrists whose names and addresses are provided by WPA member societies and sections. World Psychiatry is also freely accessible on Wiley Online Library and PubMed Central. The main aim of World Psychiatry is to disseminate information on significant clinical, service, and research developments in the mental health field. The journal aims to use a language that can be understood by the majority of mental health professionals worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Augmenting trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder with memory specificity training: a randomized controlled trial. Changing approaches to interventions for autistic adults. Dispelling "pleasing myths" about the integration of ecological momentary assessment and intervention into clinical research and practice. Effectiveness of a stepped-care programme of WHO psychological interventions in a population of migrants: results from the RESPOND randomized controlled trial. The current clinical approach to feeding and eating disorders aimed to increase personalization of management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1