English and Irish population comparison using STR markers: Insights into genetic disparities and historical influences

Jessica Perry , Sharlize Pedroza Matute , Stephen Cummings , Tasnim Munshi , Sasitaran Iyavoo
{"title":"English and Irish population comparison using STR markers: Insights into genetic disparities and historical influences","authors":"Jessica Perry ,&nbsp;Sharlize Pedroza Matute ,&nbsp;Stephen Cummings ,&nbsp;Tasnim Munshi ,&nbsp;Sasitaran Iyavoo","doi":"10.1016/j.fsir.2023.100334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Short tandem repeat (STR) markers are commonly used in forensic investigations and kinship testing due to their cost-effectiveness and high discriminatory power. In the United Kingdom, STR allele frequency databases are available for different population groups, including the White group, which includes individuals of both English and Irish ethnicity. However, considering differences in historical migrations and influences between England and Ireland, distinct genetic differences might exist between these populations. This study aimed to generate allele frequency data for English and Irish populations using the VeriFiler Express PCR Amplification Kit, which contains loci utilised in national databases. Buccal swabs were collected from 577 English and 500 Irish volunteers with self-proclaimed English and Irish ethnicity respectively. DNA profiling and statistical analyses were performed to assess allele frequencies and forensic parameters, and to perform population comparisons. The results showed minimal genetic differentiation (F<sub>st</sub> = 0.0013) between the English and Irish populations. Comparison with other European populations revealed close genetic relationships between the English population and Scandinavian countries, while the Irish population displayed closer genetic links to Western European countries. These findings support historical influences such as Viking migrations and highlight the need for further research using additional markers to explore the genetic makeup and history of the English and Irish populations. Although a single allele frequency database may be suitable due to the observed genetic similarity, the establishment of separate databases should be considered to ensure maximum population representation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36331,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Reports","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910723000294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Short tandem repeat (STR) markers are commonly used in forensic investigations and kinship testing due to their cost-effectiveness and high discriminatory power. In the United Kingdom, STR allele frequency databases are available for different population groups, including the White group, which includes individuals of both English and Irish ethnicity. However, considering differences in historical migrations and influences between England and Ireland, distinct genetic differences might exist between these populations. This study aimed to generate allele frequency data for English and Irish populations using the VeriFiler Express PCR Amplification Kit, which contains loci utilised in national databases. Buccal swabs were collected from 577 English and 500 Irish volunteers with self-proclaimed English and Irish ethnicity respectively. DNA profiling and statistical analyses were performed to assess allele frequencies and forensic parameters, and to perform population comparisons. The results showed minimal genetic differentiation (Fst = 0.0013) between the English and Irish populations. Comparison with other European populations revealed close genetic relationships between the English population and Scandinavian countries, while the Irish population displayed closer genetic links to Western European countries. These findings support historical influences such as Viking migrations and highlight the need for further research using additional markers to explore the genetic makeup and history of the English and Irish populations. Although a single allele frequency database may be suitable due to the observed genetic similarity, the establishment of separate databases should be considered to ensure maximum population representation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用STR标记的英国和爱尔兰人口比较:对遗传差异和历史影响的见解
短串联重复序列(STR)标记由于具有成本效益和高分辨能力,在法医调查和亲属关系检测中被广泛使用。在英国,STR等位基因频率数据库可用于不同的人口群体,包括白人群体,其中包括英格兰和爱尔兰种族的个人。然而,考虑到英格兰和爱尔兰在历史移民和影响方面的差异,这些人群之间可能存在明显的遗传差异。本研究旨在使用VeriFiler快速PCR扩增试剂盒生成英国和爱尔兰人群的等位基因频率数据,该试剂盒包含国家数据库中使用的位点。他们分别收集了577名自称是英格兰人和爱尔兰人的志愿者的口腔拭子。进行DNA分析和统计分析,以评估等位基因频率和法医参数,并进行人群比较。结果显示,英格兰和爱尔兰人群之间的遗传分化最小(Fst = 0.0013)。与其他欧洲人口的比较显示,英国人口与斯堪的纳维亚国家的遗传关系密切,而爱尔兰人口与西欧国家的遗传关系更密切。这些发现支持了维京人迁徙等历史影响,并强调了使用其他标记进行进一步研究的必要性,以探索英国和爱尔兰人口的基因构成和历史。虽然由于观察到遗传相似性,单一等位基因频率数据库可能是合适的,但应考虑建立单独的数据库,以确保最大的群体代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Science International: Reports
Forensic Science International: Reports Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Survey of bloodstain pattern analysts regarding pattern classifications on assorted fabrics Missing persons of post-conflict countries: Assessing dental identification through a questionnaire-based study in Syria Technical Report A light touch; Reviewing the relative effectiveness of light sources and physical/chemical techniques for fingermark retrieval in casework From death to the Virgin birth: Multi-analytical investigation of a suspected 16th century painting Medico-legal analysis of the correlation between head trauma and aneurysm rupture: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1