Equal treatment as an instrument of integration. The CJEU's case law on social rights for third-country nationals under the EU migration directives

IF 1.5 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION European Journal of Social Security Pub Date : 2023-07-09 DOI:10.1177/13882627231185988
H. Verschueren
{"title":"Equal treatment as an instrument of integration. The CJEU's case law on social rights for third-country nationals under the EU migration directives","authors":"H. Verschueren","doi":"10.1177/13882627231185988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a growing tendency for the EU Member States to introduce conditions relating to the right to social benefits that are mostly disadvantageous to third-country nationals. These conditions are at risk of conflicting with provisions on the right to equal treatment with the nationals of the host country, as set down in a number of EU migration directives. This is all the more the case now that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has recently given a broad interpretation of these provisions. Consequently, the Member States are to take these provisions as well as the CJEU's case law into account when seeking to limit access to social benefits for third-country nationals. This article examines the content and meaning of these provisions and the relevant case law of the CJEU. It concludes that it is apparent from this case law that the main objective of the right to equal treatment in these directives is to promote the integration of said third-country nationals into the host country and, therefore, the Member States may not make this right dependent on a prior sufficient level of integration in that host country.","PeriodicalId":44670,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627231185988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing tendency for the EU Member States to introduce conditions relating to the right to social benefits that are mostly disadvantageous to third-country nationals. These conditions are at risk of conflicting with provisions on the right to equal treatment with the nationals of the host country, as set down in a number of EU migration directives. This is all the more the case now that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has recently given a broad interpretation of these provisions. Consequently, the Member States are to take these provisions as well as the CJEU's case law into account when seeking to limit access to social benefits for third-country nationals. This article examines the content and meaning of these provisions and the relevant case law of the CJEU. It concludes that it is apparent from this case law that the main objective of the right to equal treatment in these directives is to promote the integration of said third-country nationals into the host country and, therefore, the Member States may not make this right dependent on a prior sufficient level of integration in that host country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平等待遇作为融合的手段。欧洲法院关于第三国公民在欧盟移民指令下的社会权利的判例法
欧盟成员国越来越倾向于引入与社会福利权有关的条件,而这些条件大多对第三国国民不利。这些条件有可能与一些欧盟移民指令中规定的与东道国国民平等待遇的权利相冲突。由于欧盟法院最近对这些条款做出了广泛的解释,情况更是如此。因此,成员国在寻求限制第三国国民获得社会福利时,应考虑到这些条款以及欧盟法院的判例法。本文审查了这些条款的内容和含义以及欧盟法院的相关判例法。它的结论是,从这一判例法中可以明显看出,这些指令中平等待遇权的主要目标是促进上述第三国国民融入东道国,因此,成员国可能不会使这一权利依赖于事先在东道国充分融入的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Social Security
European Journal of Social Security PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Book Review: The Quantified Worker. Law and Technology in the Modern Workplace by Ifeoma Ajunwa An Effective protection against unemployment for self-employed and platform workers? The intriguing case of Denmark Exploring unemployment insurance for the self-employed and platform workers: How to navigate difficult waters? A comparative, conceptual and European perspective The rights to social security and social assistance in the European Social Charter: Towards a positive content…but what sort of content? Reaching the European 2030 poverty target: The imperative to balance the EU social agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1