Indonesia and Conservation Outside Forests: An Option to Untangle Authority Dualism in the Implementation of the Essential Ecosystem Area

A. Merdekawati, Marsudi Triatmodjo, S. Nurvianto, Irkham Afnan Trisandi Hasibuan, Vivin Purnamawati, I. Agung
{"title":"Indonesia and Conservation Outside Forests: An Option to Untangle Authority Dualism in the Implementation of the Essential Ecosystem Area","authors":"A. Merdekawati, Marsudi Triatmodjo, S. Nurvianto, Irkham Afnan Trisandi Hasibuan, Vivin Purnamawati, I. Agung","doi":"10.20961/yustisia.v11i1.54789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a country rich in biodiversity, Indonesia has realised the importance of conducting conservation efforts beyond the designated conservation areas, where most of the biodiversity elements are located. In fact, the country has adopted the concept of Essential Ecosystem Areas (EEAs) into various statutory instruments. However, the implementation of EEA policies has faced various obstacles stemming from the dualism of authority between the central and regional governments in establishing and managing EEA. Act No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government delegates the implementation to the provincial governments. At the same time, Government Regulation No. 28 of 2011 mandates that the exercise of EEA protection be integrated with conservation efforts conducted by the central government. Therefore, this study aims to analyse the legal implications of the dualism of authority in EEA implementation and provide recommendations for a regulatory scheme. The problem may be mitigated by considering the factors relevant to the regulatory implementation aspects. The results revealed that the existence of dualism of authority has had implications in several aspects, including the authority in establishing, managing and financing EEAs, which have prevented authorities from achieving the objectives of establishing EEAs. Thus, this study also recommends the integrated and modified implementation of EEA policies in several ways","PeriodicalId":33244,"journal":{"name":"Yustisia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yustisia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v11i1.54789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a country rich in biodiversity, Indonesia has realised the importance of conducting conservation efforts beyond the designated conservation areas, where most of the biodiversity elements are located. In fact, the country has adopted the concept of Essential Ecosystem Areas (EEAs) into various statutory instruments. However, the implementation of EEA policies has faced various obstacles stemming from the dualism of authority between the central and regional governments in establishing and managing EEA. Act No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government delegates the implementation to the provincial governments. At the same time, Government Regulation No. 28 of 2011 mandates that the exercise of EEA protection be integrated with conservation efforts conducted by the central government. Therefore, this study aims to analyse the legal implications of the dualism of authority in EEA implementation and provide recommendations for a regulatory scheme. The problem may be mitigated by considering the factors relevant to the regulatory implementation aspects. The results revealed that the existence of dualism of authority has had implications in several aspects, including the authority in establishing, managing and financing EEAs, which have prevented authorities from achieving the objectives of establishing EEAs. Thus, this study also recommends the integrated and modified implementation of EEA policies in several ways
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度尼西亚与森林以外的保护:在实施基本生态系统区时解开权力二元主义的一种选择
作为一个生物多样性丰富的国家,印度尼西亚已经意识到在指定保护区之外开展保护工作的重要性,因为大多数生物多样性元素都位于指定保护区。事实上,该国已将基本生态系统区的概念纳入各种法定文书。然而,由于中央政府和地区政府在建立和管理欧洲经济区方面的双重权力,欧洲经济区政策的实施面临着各种障碍。2014年关于地区政府的第23号法令将实施工作委托给省级政府。与此同时,2011年第28号政府条例规定,欧洲经济区的保护工作应与中央政府的保护工作相结合。因此,本研究旨在分析欧洲经济区实施中权力二元论的法律含义,并为监管方案提供建议。可以通过考虑与监管实施方面相关的因素来缓解该问题。研究结果表明,权力二元论的存在对几个方面产生了影响,包括建立、管理和资助专属经济区的权力,这阻碍了当局实现建立专属经济区目标。因此,本研究还建议以多种方式综合和修改欧洲经济区政策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Postponed Regional Head Elections in Emergency Situations: a Constitutional Democracy Perspective in Indonesia Eliminating the Gap of Labor and Social Protection for the Workers of Platform-Based Transportation A Circular Economy-Based Plastic Waste Management Policy in Indonesia (Compared to China and EU) Enhancing Consumer Protection in the Indonesian Financial Service Sector through the Utilization of Standardized Contracts Inadequate Cryptocurrency and Money Laundering Regulations in Indonesia (Comparative Law of US and Germany)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1