Mental health care using video during COVID-19: service user and clinician experiences, including future preferences

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Mental Health Review Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-11 DOI:10.1108/mhrj-06-2022-0036
L. Samad, B. Teague, K. Elzubeir, Karen Moreira, N. Agarwal, S. Bagge, Emma Marriott, Jonathan Wilson
{"title":"Mental health care using video during COVID-19: service user and clinician experiences, including future preferences","authors":"L. Samad, B. Teague, K. Elzubeir, Karen Moreira, N. Agarwal, S. Bagge, Emma Marriott, Jonathan Wilson","doi":"10.1108/mhrj-06-2022-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to evaluate service user (SU) and clinician acceptability of video care, including future preferences to inform mental health practice during COVID-19, and beyond.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nStructured questionnaires were co-developed with SUs and clinicians. The SU online experience questionnaire was built into video consultations (VCs) via the Attend Anywhere platform, completed between July 2020 and March 2021. A Trust-wide clinician experience survey was conducted between July and October 2020. Chi-squared test was performed for any differences in clinician VC rating by mental health difficulties, with the content analysis used for free-text data.\n\n\nFindings\nOf 1,275 SUs completing the questionnaire following VC, most felt supported (93.4%), and their needs were met (90%). For future appointments, 51.8% of SUs preferred video, followed by face-to-face (33%), with COVID-related and practical reasons given. Of 249 clinicians, 161 (64.7%) had used VCs. Most felt the therapeutic relationship (76.4%) and privacy (78.7%) were maintained. Clinicians felt confident about clinical assessment and management using video. However, they were less confident in assessing psychotic symptoms and initiating psychotropic medications. There were no significant differences in clinician VC rating by mental health difficulties. For future, more SUs preferred using video, with a quarter providing practical reasons.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study provides a real-world example of video care implementation. In addition to highlighting clinician needs, support at the wider system/policy level, with a focus on addressing inequalities, can inform mental health care beyond COVID-19.\n","PeriodicalId":45687,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health Review Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health Review Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mhrj-06-2022-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to evaluate service user (SU) and clinician acceptability of video care, including future preferences to inform mental health practice during COVID-19, and beyond. Design/methodology/approach Structured questionnaires were co-developed with SUs and clinicians. The SU online experience questionnaire was built into video consultations (VCs) via the Attend Anywhere platform, completed between July 2020 and March 2021. A Trust-wide clinician experience survey was conducted between July and October 2020. Chi-squared test was performed for any differences in clinician VC rating by mental health difficulties, with the content analysis used for free-text data. Findings Of 1,275 SUs completing the questionnaire following VC, most felt supported (93.4%), and their needs were met (90%). For future appointments, 51.8% of SUs preferred video, followed by face-to-face (33%), with COVID-related and practical reasons given. Of 249 clinicians, 161 (64.7%) had used VCs. Most felt the therapeutic relationship (76.4%) and privacy (78.7%) were maintained. Clinicians felt confident about clinical assessment and management using video. However, they were less confident in assessing psychotic symptoms and initiating psychotropic medications. There were no significant differences in clinician VC rating by mental health difficulties. For future, more SUs preferred using video, with a quarter providing practical reasons. Originality/value The study provides a real-world example of video care implementation. In addition to highlighting clinician needs, support at the wider system/policy level, with a focus on addressing inequalities, can inform mental health care beyond COVID-19.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19期间使用视频的精神卫生保健:服务用户和临床医生的经验,包括未来的偏好
目的本文旨在评估服务用户(SU)和临床医生对视频护理的可接受性,包括在新冠肺炎期间及以后为心理健康实践提供信息的未来偏好。设计/方法/方法结构化问卷是与SU和临床医生共同开发的。SU在线体验问卷通过Attent Anywhere平台纳入视频咨询(VC),于2020年7月至2021年3月完成。2020年7月至10月期间,进行了一项全信托临床医生经验调查。采用卡方检验法对临床医生因心理健康困难对VC评分的任何差异进行检验,内容分析用于自由文本数据。结果在1275名VC后完成问卷调查的SUs中,大多数人感到得到了支持(93.4%),他们的需求得到了满足(90%)。对于未来的预约,51.8%的SU更喜欢视频,其次是面对面(33%),并给出了与新冠肺炎相关的实际原因。249名临床医生中,161人(64.7%)使用过VCs。大多数人认为治疗关系(76.4%)和隐私(78.7%)得到了维持。临床医生对使用视频进行临床评估和管理充满信心。然而,他们对评估精神病症状和开始服用精神药物缺乏信心。临床医生对心理健康困难的VC评分没有显著差异。对于未来,更多的SUV更喜欢使用视频,四分之一的SUV提供了实际原因。独创性/价值该研究提供了一个视频护理实施的真实例子。除了强调临床医生的需求外,更广泛的系统/政策层面的支持,重点是解决不平等问题,可以为新冠肺炎之后的心理健康护理提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Understanding gender-responsive needs of girls in the Children and Young People Secure Estate (CYPSE): menstrual cycle considerations Editorial: The British and Irish group for the study of personality disorder: reflections on the 23rd annual conference The “Team Tree” Professional Tree of Life intervention: development and evaluation within the acute inpatient psychiatric setting Systematicity of receiving mental health care predicts better subjective well-being of Ukrainians during the second year of the Russian invasion Comparing service user perspectives of an early intervention in psychosis service before and during COVID-19 lockdowns: a service evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1