On Tolstoy and Foucault: Intellectuals, Conscience, and the Entanglements of Bio-Power

IF 0.3 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, SLAVIC RUSSIAN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ruslit.2023.05.002
Vadim Shkolnikov
{"title":"On Tolstoy and Foucault: Intellectuals, Conscience, and the Entanglements of Bio-Power","authors":"Vadim Shkolnikov","doi":"10.1016/j.ruslit.2023.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper examines the new understanding of power that emerges in the late works of Leo Tolstoy, as an early premonition of ideas subsequently elaborated by Michel Foucault, particularly his seminal conception of bio-politics. In works such as <em>The Death of Ivan Ilyich</em> (1886), <em>The Kreutzer Sonata</em> (1889), and particularly the novel <em>Resurrection</em> (1899), Tolstoy undertakes precisely the kind of “struggle against power” which Foucault identifies as a fundamental task of the modern intellectual: “a struggle aimed at revealing and undermining power where it is most invisible and insidious”. In confronting the manifold manifestations of a new logic of power – a logic that he never manages to grasp fully – Tolstoy continues to rely on analytical perspectives he ostensibly denounces. Yet no one went further than Tolstoy in acknowledging and combating his own complicity with the system of power, both as a landowner and an intellectual. From this perspective Tolstoy heralds the transformation of the intellectual and conscience subsequently called for by Foucault.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43192,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347923000108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the new understanding of power that emerges in the late works of Leo Tolstoy, as an early premonition of ideas subsequently elaborated by Michel Foucault, particularly his seminal conception of bio-politics. In works such as The Death of Ivan Ilyich (1886), The Kreutzer Sonata (1889), and particularly the novel Resurrection (1899), Tolstoy undertakes precisely the kind of “struggle against power” which Foucault identifies as a fundamental task of the modern intellectual: “a struggle aimed at revealing and undermining power where it is most invisible and insidious”. In confronting the manifold manifestations of a new logic of power – a logic that he never manages to grasp fully – Tolstoy continues to rely on analytical perspectives he ostensibly denounces. Yet no one went further than Tolstoy in acknowledging and combating his own complicity with the system of power, both as a landowner and an intellectual. From this perspective Tolstoy heralds the transformation of the intellectual and conscience subsequently called for by Foucault.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论托尔斯泰与福柯:知识分子、良知与生物力量的纠缠
本文考察了列夫·托尔斯泰晚期作品中出现的对权力的新理解,作为米歇尔·福柯随后阐述的思想的早期预感,特别是他的生命政治的开创性概念。在《伊凡·伊里奇之死》(1886)、《克鲁策奏鸣曲》(1889),尤其是小说《复活》(1899)等作品中,托尔斯泰恰恰承担了福柯认为是现代知识分子基本任务的那种“与权力斗争”:“一场旨在揭示和破坏权力的斗争,在权力最不可见、最隐蔽的地方”。面对一种新的权力逻辑的多种表现形式——一种他从未完全掌握的逻辑——托尔斯泰继续依靠他表面上谴责的分析视角。然而,没有人比托尔斯泰走得更远,他承认并反对自己作为地主和知识分子与权力体系的共谋。从这个角度来看,托尔斯泰预示了随后福柯所呼吁的知识分子和良知的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RUSSIAN LITERATURE
RUSSIAN LITERATURE LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Russian Literature combines issues devoted to special topics of Russian literature with contributions on related subjects in Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Slovak and Polish literatures. Moreover, several issues each year contain articles on heterogeneous subjects concerning Russian Literature. All methods and viewpoints are welcomed, provided they contribute something new, original or challenging to our understanding of Russian and other Slavic literatures. Russian Literature regularly publishes special issues devoted to: • the historical avant-garde in Russian literature and in the other Slavic literatures • the development of descriptive and theoretical poetics in Russian studies and in studies of other Slavic fields.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board В поисках симметрии. Андрей Битов и его последний роман Rebellion Against the Church in the Name of Christ – Nikolai Leskov’s Rebel Priests and Russian Cultural Tradition «Навь и явь» в «Дневнике мыслей» Алексея Ремизова. Январь – февраль 1953 г. Review Article: New Russian Literary History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1