{"title":"Ukrainian resistance to Russian aggression in the context of “directing of action”","authors":"V. Buhaiova","doi":"10.31516/2410-5325.078.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to analyze the reflection of the Ukrainian people’s heroic resistance to Russian aggression in modern theatrical art forms in the context of “action directing”. \nThe main methodological tool for the study of the mentioned problem is a formal and art-scientific analysis of a set of theatrical artistic forms, which, in our opinion, today form a certain theatrical environment. \nAn important set of ideas on which the study of such a symbolic environment is based are ideas related to the formation of a certain “symbolic field”. In addition to the interpretation of the concept of “symbol” by classical European philosophy, the ideas of philosophers and cultural scientists of the XX century remain effective. (from B. Russell, J. Dewey, R. Carnap, J. Piaget. E. Cassirera, S. Langer, A. Whitehead, K. G. Jung, T. Todorov, O. F. Losev, Yu. M. Lotman, R. Eshelman, J. Birringer etc.), who considered various aspects of the implementation of “action directing” in the formation of modern artistic forms and symbolic expressions. Approaches substantiated by Guy Debord, R. Caiua, B. Massumi, R. Eshelman, J. Birringer, and others also appear to be methodologically important on various aspects of the problem under investigation. \nThe result of the research presented in this article is understanding of the main theatrical forms and art practices which are implemented in the context of “directing of action” during Ukrainian resistance to Russian aggression. \nThe scientific novelty of the research presented in the article is consists in understanding those projects of various typological orientations that were created by Ukrainian artists and Ukrainian society during the active phase of Russian aggression against Ukraine. The article proves that Ukrainian civil society uses both archetypal and ultra-modern figurative and semantic constructions to symbolize its opposition and implements them in the context of “directing of action”. \nThe practical significance of the results of the study is that based on the understanding of the need to nurture the creative thinking of modern directors of theatrical forms and art projects in accordance with the requirements of both Ukrainian civil society and professional requirements.","PeriodicalId":33223,"journal":{"name":"Kul''tura Ukrayini","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kul''tura Ukrayini","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31516/2410-5325.078.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to analyze the reflection of the Ukrainian people’s heroic resistance to Russian aggression in modern theatrical art forms in the context of “action directing”.
The main methodological tool for the study of the mentioned problem is a formal and art-scientific analysis of a set of theatrical artistic forms, which, in our opinion, today form a certain theatrical environment.
An important set of ideas on which the study of such a symbolic environment is based are ideas related to the formation of a certain “symbolic field”. In addition to the interpretation of the concept of “symbol” by classical European philosophy, the ideas of philosophers and cultural scientists of the XX century remain effective. (from B. Russell, J. Dewey, R. Carnap, J. Piaget. E. Cassirera, S. Langer, A. Whitehead, K. G. Jung, T. Todorov, O. F. Losev, Yu. M. Lotman, R. Eshelman, J. Birringer etc.), who considered various aspects of the implementation of “action directing” in the formation of modern artistic forms and symbolic expressions. Approaches substantiated by Guy Debord, R. Caiua, B. Massumi, R. Eshelman, J. Birringer, and others also appear to be methodologically important on various aspects of the problem under investigation.
The result of the research presented in this article is understanding of the main theatrical forms and art practices which are implemented in the context of “directing of action” during Ukrainian resistance to Russian aggression.
The scientific novelty of the research presented in the article is consists in understanding those projects of various typological orientations that were created by Ukrainian artists and Ukrainian society during the active phase of Russian aggression against Ukraine. The article proves that Ukrainian civil society uses both archetypal and ultra-modern figurative and semantic constructions to symbolize its opposition and implements them in the context of “directing of action”.
The practical significance of the results of the study is that based on the understanding of the need to nurture the creative thinking of modern directors of theatrical forms and art projects in accordance with the requirements of both Ukrainian civil society and professional requirements.
本文旨在分析在“动作导演”背景下,乌克兰人民英勇抵抗俄罗斯侵略在现代戏剧艺术形式中的反映。研究上述问题的主要方法论工具是对一套戏剧艺术形式进行形式的和艺术科学的分析,在我们看来,这些艺术形式在今天形成了一定的戏剧环境。对这种符号环境的研究所依据的一套重要观念是与某种“符号场”的形成有关的观念。除了古典欧洲哲学对“符号”概念的解释外,20世纪哲学家和文化科学家的思想仍然有效。(选自罗素、杜威、卡尔纳普、皮亚杰。E. cassiera, S. Langer, A. Whitehead, K. G. Jung, T. Todorov, O. F. Losev, Yu。M. Lotman, R. Eshelman, J. Birringer等),他们考虑了“动作导演”在形成现代艺术形式和符号表达中的各个方面的实施。由Guy Debord, R. Caiua, B. Massumi, R. Eshelman, J. Birringer和其他人证实的方法在研究问题的各个方面似乎在方法上也很重要。本文提出的研究结果是对乌克兰抵抗俄罗斯侵略期间“行动指导”背景下实施的主要戏剧形式和艺术实践的理解。文章中提出的研究的科学新颖性在于理解在俄罗斯侵略乌克兰的活跃阶段由乌克兰艺术家和乌克兰社会创造的各种类型取向的项目。文章论证了乌克兰公民社会在“行动指导”的语境中,运用原型和超现代的比喻和语义结构来象征其反对,并加以实施。该研究结果的实际意义在于,基于对需要根据乌克兰民间社会和专业要求培养现代戏剧形式和艺术项目导演的创造性思维的理解。