Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Family- Oriented Prevention in German-Speaking Countries: A Contribution to Cross-Cultural Generalization

M. Weiss, Martin Schmucker, F. Lösel
{"title":"Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Family- Oriented Prevention in German-Speaking Countries: A Contribution to Cross-Cultural Generalization","authors":"M. Weiss, Martin Schmucker, F. Lösel","doi":"10.3233/dev-210320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most research on developmental prevention programs stems from Anglo-American countries. However, in German-speaking European countries, there is also a broad range of family-oriented programs to promote child development and prevent behavioral problems. This article presents a meta-analysis of n = 79 studies on family-based prevention that had a comparison group and were performed in Germany, Austria, or Switzerland. Overall, the data contained 10,667 parents and showed a significant positive mean effect of the programs (d = 0.31). The mean effect for parent related outcomes (d = 0.40) was larger than for measures of child behavior (d = 0.20). There was much heterogeneity across studies and very few had follow-ups of more than one year. Moderator analyses revealed particular influences of methodological study characteristics, e.g. larger effects in smaller samples and less well-controlled studies. Most results of our meta-analysis are similar to what has been found in the English-speaking world. However, as in international practice, the evaluated programs seem to be not representative for everyday prevention reality where many programs are not evaluated at all. Our study confirms the need for more high-quality and long-term evaluation as well as cross-national comparisons and replicated moderator analyses.","PeriodicalId":38324,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Developmental Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Developmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/dev-210320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most research on developmental prevention programs stems from Anglo-American countries. However, in German-speaking European countries, there is also a broad range of family-oriented programs to promote child development and prevent behavioral problems. This article presents a meta-analysis of n = 79 studies on family-based prevention that had a comparison group and were performed in Germany, Austria, or Switzerland. Overall, the data contained 10,667 parents and showed a significant positive mean effect of the programs (d = 0.31). The mean effect for parent related outcomes (d = 0.40) was larger than for measures of child behavior (d = 0.20). There was much heterogeneity across studies and very few had follow-ups of more than one year. Moderator analyses revealed particular influences of methodological study characteristics, e.g. larger effects in smaller samples and less well-controlled studies. Most results of our meta-analysis are similar to what has been found in the English-speaking world. However, as in international practice, the evaluated programs seem to be not representative for everyday prevention reality where many programs are not evaluated at all. Our study confirms the need for more high-quality and long-term evaluation as well as cross-national comparisons and replicated moderator analyses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德语国家家庭预防效果的元分析:对跨文化泛化的贡献
大多数关于发展预防计划的研究都来自英美国家。然而,在讲德语的欧洲国家,也有一系列以家庭为导向的项目来促进儿童发展和预防行为问题。本文对n = 79项在德国、奥地利或瑞士进行的基于家庭的预防研究,有一个对照组。总体而言,该数据包含10667名家长,并显示出该计划的显著正平均效应(d = 0.31)。父母相关结果的平均效应(d = 0.40)大于儿童行为的测量值(d = 0.20)。研究之间存在很大的异质性,很少有超过一年的随访。主持人分析揭示了方法学研究特征的特殊影响,例如较小样本中的较大影响和控制较差的研究。我们的荟萃分析的大多数结果与英语世界的结果相似。然而,与国际实践一样,评估的项目似乎不能代表日常预防的现实,因为许多项目根本没有得到评估。我们的研究证实了需要更高质量和长期的评估,以及跨国比较和重复的调节因子分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Developmental Sciences
International Journal of Developmental Sciences Social Sciences-Life-span and Life-course Studies
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Predicting Adolescents’ Intentions to Support Victims of Bullying from Expected Reactions of Friends versus Peers A Meta-Analysis on the Link Between Young People’s Social Environment, Socioeconomic Status, and Political Violence Outcomes Honor Endorsement in Male Youth: A General Risk Factor for Aggressive Behavior? Extremist Thinking and Doing: A Systematic Literature Study of Empirical Findings on Factors Associated with (De)Radicalisation Processes Special Issue Editorial: Political Socialization as Desiderata of Developmental Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1