The Double Topology: Reflections on the Function and History of Literary Topoi

IF 0.8 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE POETICS TODAY Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1215/03335372-9470982
Carsten Meiner
{"title":"The Double Topology: Reflections on the Function and History of Literary Topoi","authors":"Carsten Meiner","doi":"10.1215/03335372-9470982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article sets out to rethink literary topology by way of a three-step argument. The article first critically analyzes how Curtius grounds topoi in Jung's archetypes and how Bakhtin grounds topoi in temporality. The article then proposes to think of literary topoi as originating in cultural and historical reality. At different points in time, new places, discourses, practices, and events arise, and, because of their cultural ubiquity, these cultural phenomena possess obvious conventional functions and meanings, a sort of cultural doxa. Second, however, literature constantly uses these phenomena for purposes other than the primary conventional ones. On the background of this constant literary misuse of culturally conventional phenomena, the article argues that a literary misuse, a heterodox use, is tied to the doxa of these new phenomena, a relation termed the double topology. The article demonstrates how this notion works with respect to new places (the horse carriage), discourses (gastronomy), practices (gallantry), and events (revolts). Third, the article discusses how literary history reflects upon its own heterodox topoi and the constant risk of their becoming clichés. At certain times, critical topoi themselves become clichés, and the article indicates ways in which authors have tried to rework topoi in order for them to become literary resources again.","PeriodicalId":46669,"journal":{"name":"POETICS TODAY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POETICS TODAY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-9470982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article sets out to rethink literary topology by way of a three-step argument. The article first critically analyzes how Curtius grounds topoi in Jung's archetypes and how Bakhtin grounds topoi in temporality. The article then proposes to think of literary topoi as originating in cultural and historical reality. At different points in time, new places, discourses, practices, and events arise, and, because of their cultural ubiquity, these cultural phenomena possess obvious conventional functions and meanings, a sort of cultural doxa. Second, however, literature constantly uses these phenomena for purposes other than the primary conventional ones. On the background of this constant literary misuse of culturally conventional phenomena, the article argues that a literary misuse, a heterodox use, is tied to the doxa of these new phenomena, a relation termed the double topology. The article demonstrates how this notion works with respect to new places (the horse carriage), discourses (gastronomy), practices (gallantry), and events (revolts). Third, the article discusses how literary history reflects upon its own heterodox topoi and the constant risk of their becoming clichés. At certain times, critical topoi themselves become clichés, and the article indicates ways in which authors have tried to rework topoi in order for them to become literary resources again.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双重拓扑:对文学拓扑功能和历史的思考
本文试图通过三步论证的方式重新思考文学拓扑学。本文首先批判性地分析了柯蒂斯如何在荣格的原型中建立拓扑,以及巴赫金如何在时间性中建立拓扑。文章进而提出,文学拓扑学是源于文化历史现实的。在不同的时间点,新的地点、话语、实践和事件出现了,由于它们的文化普遍性,这些文化现象具有明显的传统功能和意义,是一种文化doxa。然而,第二,文学不断地将这些现象用于主要传统现象之外的目的。在这种对文化传统现象的不断文学滥用的背景下,文章认为,文学滥用,一种异端的使用,与这些新现象的doxa有关,这种关系被称为双重拓扑。这篇文章展示了这个概念是如何在新的地方(马车)、话语(美食)、实践(英勇)和事件(反抗)中发挥作用的。第三,文章讨论了文学史如何反思其自身的异端拓扑,以及它们不断成为陈词滥调的风险。在某些时候,批判性的拓扑学本身就成了陈词滥调,文章指出了作者试图重新创作拓扑学的方式,以便它们再次成为文学资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
POETICS TODAY
POETICS TODAY LITERATURE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: International Journal for Theory and Analysis of Literature and Communication Poetics Today brings together scholars from throughout the world who are concerned with developing systematic approaches to the study of literature (e.g., semiotics and narratology) and with applying such approaches to the interpretation of literary works. Poetics Today presents a remarkable diversity of methodologies and examines a wide range of literary and critical topics. Several thematic review sections or special issues are published in each volume, and each issue contains a book review section, with article-length review essays.
期刊最新文献
Visual Hybrids and Nonconceptual Aesthetic Perception Visual Metaphors: On the Linguistic Structure of Hybrid Creatures in Art L'idée de la littérature. De l'art pour l'art aux écritures d'intervention Hybridity and the Unifying Space of Painting: Larry Abramson in Conversation with Theolonius Marx Magical Monsters: Hybrids and Witchcraft in Early Modern Art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1