EXPRESS: Impact of Buying Groups on Buyer-Supplier Relationships: Group-Dyad Interactions in Business-to-Business Markets

IF 5.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Marketing Research Pub Date : 2023-01-07 DOI:10.1177/00222437231152207
Alok Kumar, Huanhuan Shi, Jenifer Skiba, Amit Saini, Zhi Lu
{"title":"EXPRESS: Impact of Buying Groups on Buyer-Supplier Relationships: Group-Dyad Interactions in Business-to-Business Markets","authors":"Alok Kumar, Huanhuan Shi, Jenifer Skiba, Amit Saini, Zhi Lu","doi":"10.1177/00222437231152207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the impact of business-to-business (B2B) buying groups on buyer-supplier relationships. The authors outline two distinct initiatives — monitoring and community building — through which buying groups help govern buyer–supplier exchange and impact supplier performance toward buyers. Two boundary conditions are identified for the performance efficacy of the buying group's governance efforts, namely, the buyer's own governance of the supplier and the dependence relations among the focal parties. Analyses using two-wave primary data collected from the U.S. healthcare sector and replications using secondary outcomes suggest support for the proposed framework. A conjoint experiment is conducted to further enhance the generalizability of the findings. We find that a buying group's monitoring of suppliers enhances supplier performance both by itself and with increasing supplier monitoring by the buyer firm. Further, the supplier’s dependence on the buying group and the buyer’s dependence on the supplier, both sharpen the efficacy of the buying group’s monitoring program. However, the performance effects of community building are weakened as the buyer–supplier relationship becomes stronger and as the buyer grows more dependent on the supplier. The paper thus uncovers novel interplays between B2B buying groups and B2B dyads, and documents their consequences for firm performance.","PeriodicalId":48465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437231152207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of business-to-business (B2B) buying groups on buyer-supplier relationships. The authors outline two distinct initiatives — monitoring and community building — through which buying groups help govern buyer–supplier exchange and impact supplier performance toward buyers. Two boundary conditions are identified for the performance efficacy of the buying group's governance efforts, namely, the buyer's own governance of the supplier and the dependence relations among the focal parties. Analyses using two-wave primary data collected from the U.S. healthcare sector and replications using secondary outcomes suggest support for the proposed framework. A conjoint experiment is conducted to further enhance the generalizability of the findings. We find that a buying group's monitoring of suppliers enhances supplier performance both by itself and with increasing supplier monitoring by the buyer firm. Further, the supplier’s dependence on the buying group and the buyer’s dependence on the supplier, both sharpen the efficacy of the buying group’s monitoring program. However, the performance effects of community building are weakened as the buyer–supplier relationship becomes stronger and as the buyer grows more dependent on the supplier. The paper thus uncovers novel interplays between B2B buying groups and B2B dyads, and documents their consequences for firm performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS:购买群体对买方-供应商关系的影响:企业对企业市场中的群体动态互动
本文考察了企业对企业(B2B)购买群体对买方-供应商关系的影响。作者概述了两种截然不同的举措——监督和社区建设——通过这两种举措,购买团体帮助管理买方与供应商之间的交流,并影响供应商对买家的表现。确定了采购集团治理工作绩效有效性的两个边界条件,即买方自身对供应商的治理和焦点方之间的依赖关系。使用从美国医疗保健部门收集的两波主要数据进行的分析和使用次要结果进行的重复分析表明支持所提议的框架。为了进一步提高研究结果的普遍性,还进行了一次联合实验。我们发现,采购集团对供应商的监督不仅提高了供应商的绩效,而且随着采购公司对供应商监督的增加,也提高了供应商的绩效。此外,供应商对采购群体的依赖和采购群体对供应商的依赖都增强了采购群体监控方案的有效性。然而,社区建设的绩效效应会随着买家与供应商关系的增强和买家对供应商的依赖程度的增加而减弱。因此,本文揭示了B2B购买群体和B2B组合之间的新相互作用,并记录了它们对公司绩效的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JMR is written for those academics and practitioners of marketing research who need to be in the forefront of the profession and in possession of the industry"s cutting-edge information. JMR publishes articles representing the entire spectrum of research in marketing. The editorial content is peer-reviewed by an expert panel of leading academics. Articles address the concepts, methods, and applications of marketing research that present new techniques for solving marketing problems; contribute to marketing knowledge based on the use of experimental, descriptive, or analytical techniques; and review and comment on the developments and concepts in related fields that have a bearing on the research industry and its practices.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Who Shares Fake News? Uncovering Insights from Social Media Users' Post Histories EXPRESS: Monitoring Technologies in Industrial Systems EXPRESS: How Listening versus Reading Alters Consumers’ Interpretations of News EXPRESS: The Closing-the-Gap Effect: Joint Evaluation Leads Donors to Help Charities Farther from Their Goal EXPRESS: Zooming in on the Very Early Days: The Role of Trademark Applications in the Acquisition of Venture Capital Seed Funding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1