Using participatory methods to evaluate the impacts of an early intervention programme on children and young people (CYP)

Q2 Social Sciences Evaluation Journal of Australasia Pub Date : 2020-08-04 DOI:10.1177/1035719X20944020
Kylie Evans-Locke, Ching-I Hsu
{"title":"Using participatory methods to evaluate the impacts of an early intervention programme on children and young people (CYP)","authors":"Kylie Evans-Locke, Ching-I Hsu","doi":"10.1177/1035719X20944020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The child’s voice is often excluded in child and family service programme evaluations, with research traditionally favouring the views of parents, carers and other adults. Evaluations that do not provide adequate opportunities for children and young people (CYP) to be involved potentially risk misunderstanding wider programme impacts and minimising CYP-specific outcomes. CareSouth has piloted an evaluation utilising body-mapping to collect programme feedback from CYP to provide valuable insights into perceived outcomes in areas of social connection, cognitive skills and development of positive personal identity. This article will share insights and lessons CareSouth encountered during the evaluation, the methods used to ensure ethical evaluation and the lessons for other child and family service practitioners looking to extend meaningful consultation with CYP to ensure greater understanding of holistic programme impacts.","PeriodicalId":37231,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","volume":"20 1","pages":"176 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1035719X20944020","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation Journal of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X20944020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The child’s voice is often excluded in child and family service programme evaluations, with research traditionally favouring the views of parents, carers and other adults. Evaluations that do not provide adequate opportunities for children and young people (CYP) to be involved potentially risk misunderstanding wider programme impacts and minimising CYP-specific outcomes. CareSouth has piloted an evaluation utilising body-mapping to collect programme feedback from CYP to provide valuable insights into perceived outcomes in areas of social connection, cognitive skills and development of positive personal identity. This article will share insights and lessons CareSouth encountered during the evaluation, the methods used to ensure ethical evaluation and the lessons for other child and family service practitioners looking to extend meaningful consultation with CYP to ensure greater understanding of holistic programme impacts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用参与式方法评估早期干预计划对儿童和年轻人的影响(CYP)
在儿童和家庭服务方案评估中,儿童的声音往往被排除在外,研究传统上倾向于父母、看护人和其他成年人的观点。没有为儿童和年轻人(CYP)提供足够机会参与的评估可能会误解更广泛的计划影响,并将CYP特异性结果降至最低。CareSouth已经试行了一项评估,利用身体图谱收集CYP的项目反馈,为社会联系、认知技能和积极个人身份发展等领域的感知结果提供有价值的见解。本文将分享CareSouth在评估过程中遇到的见解和经验教训,用于确保道德评估的方法,以及其他儿童和家庭服务从业者的经验教训,他们希望与CYP进行有意义的咨询,以确保更好地了解整体计划的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation Journal of Australasia
Evaluation Journal of Australasia Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Utilising existing data for a pilot social return on investment analysis of the family wellbeing empowerment program: A justification and framework Evaluation at the cutting edge: Driving innovation and quality The best medicine: Lessons from health for policy randomistas Evaluator perspective: Meet an Australian Evaluation Society Fellow – Nan Wehipeihana Meta-evaluation: Validating program evaluation standards through the United Nations Evaluation Quality Assessment (EQAs)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1