Restorative validity and healing through inquiry: A visual ethnographic case study in Guatemala

IF 1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Conflict Resolution Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.1002/crq.21376
Giovanni P. Dazzo, Carmencita Cúmez, Erica Henderson, Fredy Peccerelli
{"title":"Restorative validity and healing through inquiry: A visual ethnographic case study in Guatemala","authors":"Giovanni P. Dazzo,&nbsp;Carmencita Cúmez,&nbsp;Erica Henderson,&nbsp;Fredy Peccerelli","doi":"10.1002/crq.21376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This case study is an exploration of the potential restorative and healing qualities of inquiry. The co-authors—a university-affiliated researcher, a Kaqchikel Maya community leader, and forensic anthropologists—document their stories navigating a participatory action research project as co-researchers. Using visual ethnography, we illustrate how we approached inquiry from a place of <i>restorative validity</i>, which challenges inquirers to reclaim and restore the humanity of researcher, researched, and the research process itself. Through a culturally sustaining frame, we grounded our interpretations in the Maya cultural elements of land, community, and attachment to place. We demonstrate how we intertwined our various ways of knowing and methods, from Indigenous oral tradition to interactive techniques such as ripples of change, to co-create a form of inquiry rooted in relationships, justice, and liberation. As peace, conflict, and justice researchers and practitioners work with those who have been subjected to and witnessed atrocities, we problematize whether our methodological practices are in line with our values as a community of care. In moving toward restorative validity, we ask: If the outside world robs people of their humanity, identities, and memories, do we simply observe and document these injustices; or can our inquiry work toward reclamation and restoration?</p>","PeriodicalId":39736,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/crq.21376","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/crq.21376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This case study is an exploration of the potential restorative and healing qualities of inquiry. The co-authors—a university-affiliated researcher, a Kaqchikel Maya community leader, and forensic anthropologists—document their stories navigating a participatory action research project as co-researchers. Using visual ethnography, we illustrate how we approached inquiry from a place of restorative validity, which challenges inquirers to reclaim and restore the humanity of researcher, researched, and the research process itself. Through a culturally sustaining frame, we grounded our interpretations in the Maya cultural elements of land, community, and attachment to place. We demonstrate how we intertwined our various ways of knowing and methods, from Indigenous oral tradition to interactive techniques such as ripples of change, to co-create a form of inquiry rooted in relationships, justice, and liberation. As peace, conflict, and justice researchers and practitioners work with those who have been subjected to and witnessed atrocities, we problematize whether our methodological practices are in line with our values as a community of care. In moving toward restorative validity, we ask: If the outside world robs people of their humanity, identities, and memories, do we simply observe and document these injustices; or can our inquiry work toward reclamation and restoration?

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过调查恢复有效性和愈合:危地马拉的视觉人种学案例研究
这个案例研究是对探究的潜在修复和治疗品质的探索。论文的共同作者——一名大学附属研究员、一名卡奇克尔玛雅社区领袖和一名法医人类学家——以共同研究员的身份记录了他们在一个参与式行动研究项目中的经历。使用视觉人种学,我们说明了我们如何从一个恢复有效性的地方接近探究,这挑战探究者收回和恢复研究者、被研究和研究过程本身的人性。通过文化维持框架,我们将我们的解释扎根于玛雅文化元素的土地,社区和对地方的依恋。我们展示了我们如何将各种认识方式和方法,从土著口头传统到互动技术,如变化的涟漪,交织在一起,共同创造一种植根于关系,正义和解放的探究形式。当和平、冲突和司法研究人员和从业人员与那些遭受和目睹暴行的人合作时,我们质疑我们的方法实践是否符合我们作为一个关怀社区的价值观。在走向恢复性有效性的过程中,我们问:如果外部世界剥夺了人们的人性、身份和记忆,我们是否只是观察和记录这些不公正;或者,我们的调查能否朝着开垦和恢复的方向发展?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Conflict Resolution Quarterly Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Conflict Resolution Quarterly publishes quality scholarship on relationships between theory, research, and practice in the conflict management and dispute resolution field to promote more effective professional applications. A defining focus of the journal is the relationships among theory, research, and practice. Articles address the implications of theory for practice and research directions, how research can better inform practice, and how research can contribute to theory development with important implications for practice. Articles also focus on all aspects of the conflict resolution process and context with primary focus on the behavior, role, and impact of third parties in effectively handling conflict.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editor's foreword to Special Issue on The Promise of Moral Examplars for Conflict Resolution and Intergroup Reconciliation Testing a moral exemplar intervention in a non-conflict context: The effects of moral exemplars on key dimensions of outgroup evaluations The effects of moral exemplars awareness on common ingroup identification and reconciliation in post-genocide Rwanda Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1