'We should have our own observers of information': the American Commission to negotiate peace looks at Russia, 1919

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q1 HISTORY Intelligence and National Security Pub Date : 2023-03-02 DOI:10.1080/02684527.2023.2178748
David A. Langbart
{"title":"'We should have our own observers of information': the American Commission to negotiate peace looks at Russia, 1919","authors":"David A. Langbart","doi":"10.1080/02684527.2023.2178748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The United States found itself relatively unprepared to participate in the World War I peace conference that convened in Paris in January 1919. President Woodrow Wilson began American preparations for the peace conference in mid-1917, when he established ‘The Inquiry’ to provide background and policy papers for use at the negotiating table. Once the conference began, however, the American peace commissioners realized they required more current information to support their work. To supplement the information provided by the Department of State, the American Commission to Negotiate Peace established its own sources. In addition to participating in a number of inter-allied investigatory missions established by the conferees, the Americans sent twelve field missions of their own to various places in Europe and Asia Minor to collect information. Three of those field missions targeted Russia. The results of those missions were mixed. This article discusses the origins of the Commission’s little-known field mission program and describes the work and activities of the three missions into Russian territory. In doing so, it shows some of the earliest steps in the evolution of a more modern approach to the gathering of foreign intelligence consonant with the more prominent of the United States role in international affairs as a result of the war.","PeriodicalId":47048,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence and National Security","volume":"38 1","pages":"764 - 779"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence and National Security","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2023.2178748","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The United States found itself relatively unprepared to participate in the World War I peace conference that convened in Paris in January 1919. President Woodrow Wilson began American preparations for the peace conference in mid-1917, when he established ‘The Inquiry’ to provide background and policy papers for use at the negotiating table. Once the conference began, however, the American peace commissioners realized they required more current information to support their work. To supplement the information provided by the Department of State, the American Commission to Negotiate Peace established its own sources. In addition to participating in a number of inter-allied investigatory missions established by the conferees, the Americans sent twelve field missions of their own to various places in Europe and Asia Minor to collect information. Three of those field missions targeted Russia. The results of those missions were mixed. This article discusses the origins of the Commission’s little-known field mission program and describes the work and activities of the three missions into Russian territory. In doing so, it shows some of the earliest steps in the evolution of a more modern approach to the gathering of foreign intelligence consonant with the more prominent of the United States role in international affairs as a result of the war.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们应该有自己的情报观察员”:美国和平谈判委员会对俄国的看法,1919年
1919年1月在巴黎召开的第一次世界大战和平会议上,美国发现自己相对没有准备好。伍德罗·威尔逊总统于1917年中期开始为和平会议做准备,当时他成立了“调查委员会”,为谈判桌上使用提供背景和政策文件。然而,会议一开始,美国和平专员们就意识到,他们需要更多的最新信息来支持他们的工作。为了补充国务院提供的资料,美国和平谈判委员会建立了自己的资料来源。除了参加一些协约国间成立的调查任务外,美国人还派出了12个自己的实地任务,前往欧洲和小亚细亚的各个地方收集情报。其中三次实地任务是针对俄罗斯的。这些任务的结果好坏参半。本文讨论了委员会鲜为人知的实地任务计划的起源,并描述了进入俄罗斯领土的三个特派团的工作和活动。在这样做的过程中,它展示了一种更现代的收集外国情报的方法演变的一些早期步骤,这种方法与战争后美国在国际事务中的作用更加突出相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
41.70%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Intelligence has never played a more prominent role in international politics than it does now in the early years of the twenty-first century. National intelligence services are larger than ever, and they are more transparent in their activities in the policy making of democratic nations. Intelligence and National Security is widely regarded as the world''s leading scholarly journal focused on the role of intelligence and secretive agencies in international relations. It examines this aspect of national security from a variety of perspectives and academic disciplines, with insightful articles research and written by leading experts based around the globe. Among the topics covered in the journal are: • the historical development of intelligence agencies • representations of intelligence in popular culture • public understandings and expectations related to intelligence • intelligence and ethics • intelligence collection and analysis • covert action and counterintelligence • privacy and intelligence accountability • the outsourcing of intelligence operations • the role of politics in intelligence activities • international intelligence cooperation and burden-sharing • the relationships among intelligence agencies, military organizations, and civilian policy departments. Authors for Intelligence and National Security come from a range of disciplines, including international affairs, history, sociology, political science, law, anthropology, philosophy, medicine, statistics, psychology, bio-sciences, and mathematics. These perspectives are regularly augmented by research submitted from current and former intelligence practitioners in several different nations. Each issue features a rich menu of articles about the uses (and occasional misuses) of intelligence, supplemented from time to time with special forums on current intelligence issues and interviews with leading intelligence officials.
期刊最新文献
‘The painful aftermath’: reactions to the publication of SOE in France Overt Action: congressional oversight, private activism and Afghan Covert Action policy in the Reagan administration Neutering the CIA: why US intelligence versus Trump has long-term consequences Neutering the CIA: why US intelligence versus Trump has long-term consequences , by John A. Gentry, Estes Park, CO, Armin Lear Press, 2023, 504 pp., $27.95 (Paperback), ISBN: 978-1-956450-69-9 Resisting the KGB Mythmakers: Willy Fisher, spy fiction, and the myth of Rudolf Abel Skip the corsets, we’d rather have childcare: gendering spycraft in genre fiction and memoir
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1