Comparative Analysis of the Perioperative Period in High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients with Stable and Unstable Angina Pectoris

O. Gogayeva, A. Rudenko, Larysa A. Klymenko, V. Lazoryshynets
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Perioperative Period in High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients with Stable and Unstable Angina Pectoris","authors":"O. Gogayeva, A. Rudenko, Larysa A. Klymenko, V. Lazoryshynets","doi":"10.30702/jcvs/22.30(02)/gr027-1721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nThe aim. To analyze the features of the perioperative period in cardiac surgery patients with stable and unstable angina. \nMaterials and methods. Retrospective analysis of random 194 cardiac surgery patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and EuroSCORE II > 5%, who were operated and discharged from the National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the NAMS of Ukraine from 2009 to 2019. All the patients underwent standard clinical, laboratory and functional tests, coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). \nResults. When assessing the initial clinical picture of randomized patients, 110 (56.7%) were diagnosed with stable angina, and 84 (43.2%) with unstable. On admission, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was diagnosed in 12 (14.3%) patients (p < 0.0001), and among patients with stable angina 91 (82.7%) had a history of AMI (p = 0.0158). All the patients had polymorbidity: the Charlson comorbidity index was 5.7 ± 1.8 in patients with unstable angina and 5.9 ± 1.9 in stable CAD (p = 0.4583). Patients with unstable angina were more likely to have subocclusive-occlusive lesions of the left main coronary artery (p = 0.0083), left anterior descending artery (p = 0.0392) and left circumflex artery (p = 0.0387). All the patients were discussed by the cardiac team prior to surgery which was performed by experienced cardiac surgeons with 24 ± 12.5 years of experience. Emergency surgery was performed in 43 (51.1%) patients with unstable angina and 12 (10.9%) with stable angina (p <0.0001), off-pump CABG was performed in 82 (97.6%) and 105 (95.4%) patients, respectively (p = 0.4231). The postoperative period in patients with unstable angina was almost no different from that in patients with stable CAD. The patients with unstable angina were discharged on average on day 8.7 ± 4.04, and those with stable CAD were discharged on day 8.2 ± 3.2 (p = 0.3373). \nConclusions. The outcome of the operation depends on the quality of the heart team work and requires a highly qualified cardiac surgeon with sufficient experience. Performing CABG on a working heart minimizes the occurrence of perioperative complications in patients with both unstable and stable CAD.","PeriodicalId":33680,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayins''kii zhurnal sertsevosudinnoyi khirurgiyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30702/jcvs/22.30(02)/gr027-1721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  The aim. To analyze the features of the perioperative period in cardiac surgery patients with stable and unstable angina. Materials and methods. Retrospective analysis of random 194 cardiac surgery patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and EuroSCORE II > 5%, who were operated and discharged from the National Amosov Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery of the NAMS of Ukraine from 2009 to 2019. All the patients underwent standard clinical, laboratory and functional tests, coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Results. When assessing the initial clinical picture of randomized patients, 110 (56.7%) were diagnosed with stable angina, and 84 (43.2%) with unstable. On admission, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was diagnosed in 12 (14.3%) patients (p < 0.0001), and among patients with stable angina 91 (82.7%) had a history of AMI (p = 0.0158). All the patients had polymorbidity: the Charlson comorbidity index was 5.7 ± 1.8 in patients with unstable angina and 5.9 ± 1.9 in stable CAD (p = 0.4583). Patients with unstable angina were more likely to have subocclusive-occlusive lesions of the left main coronary artery (p = 0.0083), left anterior descending artery (p = 0.0392) and left circumflex artery (p = 0.0387). All the patients were discussed by the cardiac team prior to surgery which was performed by experienced cardiac surgeons with 24 ± 12.5 years of experience. Emergency surgery was performed in 43 (51.1%) patients with unstable angina and 12 (10.9%) with stable angina (p <0.0001), off-pump CABG was performed in 82 (97.6%) and 105 (95.4%) patients, respectively (p = 0.4231). The postoperative period in patients with unstable angina was almost no different from that in patients with stable CAD. The patients with unstable angina were discharged on average on day 8.7 ± 4.04, and those with stable CAD were discharged on day 8.2 ± 3.2 (p = 0.3373). Conclusions. The outcome of the operation depends on the quality of the heart team work and requires a highly qualified cardiac surgeon with sufficient experience. Performing CABG on a working heart minimizes the occurrence of perioperative complications in patients with both unstable and stable CAD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏外科高危稳定型和不稳定型心绞痛患者围手术期的比较分析
的目标。目的:分析心脏手术患者稳定型和不稳定型心绞痛的围手术期特点。材料和方法。回顾性分析2009年至2019年在乌克兰NAMS国家阿莫索夫心血管外科研究所随机手术并出院的194例冠心病(CAD)患者,EuroSCORE评分为5%。所有患者均接受了标准的临床、实验室和功能检查、冠状动脉造影和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。结果。在评估随机患者的初始临床表现时,110例(56.7%)诊断为稳定型心绞痛,84例(43.2%)诊断为不稳定型心绞痛。入院时诊断为急性心肌梗死(AMI)的患者12例(14.3%)(p < 0.0001),稳定型心绞痛患者中有AMI病史的91例(82.7%)(p = 0.0158)。不稳定型心绞痛患者的Charlson合并症指数为5.7±1.8,稳定型冠心病患者的Charlson合并症指数为5.9±1.9 (p = 0.4583)。不稳定型心绞痛患者更容易发生左冠状动脉主干(p = 0.0083)、左前降支(p = 0.0392)和左旋动脉(p = 0.0387)的闭下闭塞病变。所有患者术前均由经验丰富的心脏外科医生(24±12.5年)进行讨论。不稳定型心绞痛43例(51.1%),稳定型心绞痛12例(10.9%)(p <0.0001),分别有82例(97.6%)和105例(95.4%)患者行停泵CABG (p = 0.4231)。不稳定型心绞痛患者的术后时间与稳定型冠心病患者的术后时间几乎没有差异。不稳定型心绞痛患者平均出院时间为8.7±4.04天,稳定型心绞痛患者平均出院时间为8.2±3.2天(p = 0.3373)。结论。手术的结果取决于心脏团队的工作质量,需要一个有足够经验的高素质心脏外科医生。在正常工作的心脏上进行冠脉搭桥可以最大限度地减少不稳定和稳定冠心病患者围手术期并发症的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the Use of Non-Invasive Lung Ventilation Support in Newborns and Young Children after Cardiac Surgery Features of the Course of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with the History of COVID-19: Impact on the Possibility and Tactics of Restoring Sinus Rhythm Features of Catheter Treatment of Non-Isthmus-Dependent Atrial Flutter Issues of Organization of the Cardiac Surgical Care in Ukraine under Martial Law Hemostasiological Aspects of PCI: Periprocedural Changes in the Activity of the Platelet Link of Hemocoagulation on the Background of Prior Double Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1