How Ecuador's Courts Are Giving Form and Force to Rights of Nature Norms

IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Transnational Environmental Law Pub Date : 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1017/S2047102523000080
Craig M. Kauffman, Pamela Martin
{"title":"How Ecuador's Courts Are Giving Form and Force to Rights of Nature Norms","authors":"Craig M. Kauffman, Pamela Martin","doi":"10.1017/S2047102523000080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 2008, Ecuador recognized rights of nature (RoN) in its Constitution. Since then, RoN have been relied upon in judicial decisions 55 times in Ecuador. Following years of ad hoc treatment of RoN by Ecuador's government and courts, its Constitutional Court selected various cases to establish binding jurisprudence in respect of RoN. In doing so, the Constitutional Court and various provincial courts in Ecuador have clarified the content of RoN, including specific criteria for determining RoN violations and the relationship between RoN and other constitutional rights, including community and economic rights related to development. Moreover, the courts are imposing sanctions on RoN violators, including the state and powerful commercial sectors. This article shows how Ecuadorian court decisions are changing RoN from a vague, abstract concept into a set of specific standards for how to balance RoN with various human rights and existing environmental law in order to implement sustainable development in an integrated and holistic manner that does not sacrifice ecosystem functioning. In doing so, the article contributes to the emerging literature on how new environmental law norms are constructed as they are put into practice, as well as the important role that judges play as norm entrepreneurs.","PeriodicalId":45716,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Environmental Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102523000080","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In 2008, Ecuador recognized rights of nature (RoN) in its Constitution. Since then, RoN have been relied upon in judicial decisions 55 times in Ecuador. Following years of ad hoc treatment of RoN by Ecuador's government and courts, its Constitutional Court selected various cases to establish binding jurisprudence in respect of RoN. In doing so, the Constitutional Court and various provincial courts in Ecuador have clarified the content of RoN, including specific criteria for determining RoN violations and the relationship between RoN and other constitutional rights, including community and economic rights related to development. Moreover, the courts are imposing sanctions on RoN violators, including the state and powerful commercial sectors. This article shows how Ecuadorian court decisions are changing RoN from a vague, abstract concept into a set of specific standards for how to balance RoN with various human rights and existing environmental law in order to implement sustainable development in an integrated and holistic manner that does not sacrifice ecosystem functioning. In doing so, the article contributes to the emerging literature on how new environmental law norms are constructed as they are put into practice, as well as the important role that judges play as norm entrepreneurs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
厄瓜多尔法院如何赋予自然权利规范形式和力量
摘要2008年,厄瓜多尔在其《宪法》中承认自然权利。自那以后,RoN在厄瓜多尔的司法判决中被依赖了55次。在厄瓜多尔政府和法院对RoN进行了多年的临时处理之后,其宪法法院选择了各种案件,以确立对RoN具有约束力的判例。为此,厄瓜多尔宪法法院和各省级法院澄清了RoN的内容,包括确定违反RoN的具体标准,以及RoN与其他宪法权利之间的关系,包括与发展有关的社区和经济权利。此外,法院正在对违反RoN的人实施制裁,包括国家和强大的商业部门。这篇文章展示了厄瓜多尔法院的裁决如何将RoN从一个模糊、抽象的概念转变为一套具体的标准,以平衡RoN与各种人权和现有环境法,从而在不牺牲生态系统功能的情况下,以综合和整体的方式实施可持续发展。在这样做的过程中,这篇文章为新兴的文献做出了贡献,这些文献涉及新的环境法规范在付诸实践时是如何构建的,以及法官作为规范企业家所发挥的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
16.30%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Hope-Bearing Legislation? The Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 Transnational Governance of Soybean Land Use in South America: A Polycentric Approach Value Chains and Environmental Impact Assessments: Lessons from Two French Legal Cases on Bioenergy Facilities Looking to Livestock: Gauging the Evolution of the EU's Agri-Climate Law and Policy A Critical Review of the Energy Charter Treaty from an Earth System Law Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1