Nice and Nasty ToM Behaviors

Q4 Social Sciences Word of Mouth Pub Date : 2022-02-22 DOI:10.1177/10483950221075404
C. Westby
{"title":"Nice and Nasty ToM Behaviors","authors":"C. Westby","doi":"10.1177/10483950221075404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considerable research has highlighted that mind-reading abilities (theory of mind [ToM]) underpin particular aspects of children’s social functioning (Astington, 2003). Socially competent behaviors rely on the understanding of mental states. Children with more advanced ToM abilities show better social skills in the classroom and are less likely to receive negative behavioral evaluations from peers and aggressive evaluations from teachers (Belacchi & Farina, 2010; Diesendruck & Ben-Eliyahu, 2006). ToM is a powerful social tool that affects social relationships and fosters adjustment in everyday social contexts. Consequently, it might be believed that antisocial behavior reflects a weakness of social-cognitive skills. Although strong cognitive ToM skills are important for prosocial behavior, they do not guarantee it. Prosocial behavior requires both an understanding of and response to social cues that are influenced by cognitive ToM (awareness of thoughts), affective cognitive ToM (recognition of emotions), and affective empathy (the desire to respond to the emotions of others). Some children and adults consistently use their “mind-reading” skills for everyday antisocial purposes. Hence, the relationship between ToM and prosocial conduct is far from straightforward and simple. Just recognizing what other people need does not mean that a child will seek to meet those needs. Children may use their mind-reading abilities to manipulate, outwit, tease, or trick their peers (Astington, 2003). ToM skills may be helpful in concealing the antisocial child’s true intentions and goals by making the behavior appear inoffensive or at least ambiguous to others (Renouf et al., 2010). Thus, ToM can be used to engage both prosocial and antisocial or Machiavellian behaviors (Arefi, 2010). The expressions nice ToM and nasty ToM have been used to differentiate behaviors requiring prosocial use and antisocial use of ToM abilities, respectively (Ronald et al., 2005). Happé and Frith (1996) first proposed the expression theory of nasty minds to explain an intact but skewed A newsletter dedicated to speech & language in school-age children","PeriodicalId":39491,"journal":{"name":"Word of Mouth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Word of Mouth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10483950221075404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considerable research has highlighted that mind-reading abilities (theory of mind [ToM]) underpin particular aspects of children’s social functioning (Astington, 2003). Socially competent behaviors rely on the understanding of mental states. Children with more advanced ToM abilities show better social skills in the classroom and are less likely to receive negative behavioral evaluations from peers and aggressive evaluations from teachers (Belacchi & Farina, 2010; Diesendruck & Ben-Eliyahu, 2006). ToM is a powerful social tool that affects social relationships and fosters adjustment in everyday social contexts. Consequently, it might be believed that antisocial behavior reflects a weakness of social-cognitive skills. Although strong cognitive ToM skills are important for prosocial behavior, they do not guarantee it. Prosocial behavior requires both an understanding of and response to social cues that are influenced by cognitive ToM (awareness of thoughts), affective cognitive ToM (recognition of emotions), and affective empathy (the desire to respond to the emotions of others). Some children and adults consistently use their “mind-reading” skills for everyday antisocial purposes. Hence, the relationship between ToM and prosocial conduct is far from straightforward and simple. Just recognizing what other people need does not mean that a child will seek to meet those needs. Children may use their mind-reading abilities to manipulate, outwit, tease, or trick their peers (Astington, 2003). ToM skills may be helpful in concealing the antisocial child’s true intentions and goals by making the behavior appear inoffensive or at least ambiguous to others (Renouf et al., 2010). Thus, ToM can be used to engage both prosocial and antisocial or Machiavellian behaviors (Arefi, 2010). The expressions nice ToM and nasty ToM have been used to differentiate behaviors requiring prosocial use and antisocial use of ToM abilities, respectively (Ronald et al., 2005). Happé and Frith (1996) first proposed the expression theory of nasty minds to explain an intact but skewed A newsletter dedicated to speech & language in school-age children
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ToM的好恶行为
相当多的研究强调读心术能力(心理理论[ToM])是儿童社会功能的特定方面的基础(Astington, 2003)。社会胜任行为依赖于对心理状态的理解。ToM能力越高级的儿童在课堂上表现出更好的社交技能,并且不太可能受到同伴的负面行为评价和老师的积极评价(Belacchi & Farina, 2010;Diesendruck & Ben-Eliyahu, 2006)。汤姆是一个强大的社会工具,影响社会关系和促进适应日常社会环境。因此,可以认为反社会行为反映了社会认知技能的弱点。虽然强大的认知ToM技能对亲社会行为很重要,但它们并不能保证它。亲社会行为需要理解和回应受认知汤姆(思想意识)、情感认知汤姆(情绪识别)和情感共情(对他人情绪做出反应的愿望)影响的社会线索。一些儿童和成人经常把他们的“读心术”用于日常的反社会目的。因此,ToM与亲社会行为之间的关系远不是直接和简单的。仅仅认识到别人的需要并不意味着孩子会寻求满足这些需要。孩子们可能会利用他们的读心术来操纵、智胜、戏弄或欺骗他们的同伴(Astington, 2003)。ToM技能可能有助于隐藏反社会儿童的真实意图和目标,使其行为看起来不冒犯他人或至少对他人模棱两可(Renouf et al., 2010)。因此,ToM可用于参与亲社会和反社会或马基雅维利行为(Arefi, 2010)。“好汤姆”和“坏汤姆”这两个表达分别被用来区分需要亲社会使用和反社会使用汤姆能力的行为(Ronald et al., 2005)。happ和Frith(1996)首先提出了“肮脏思想的表达理论”,以解释一份完整但有偏误的《A》通讯,专门研究学龄儿童的言语和语言
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Word of Mouth
Word of Mouth Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: ...helps frontline clinicians keep up with the latest trends in working with school-age children. Each 16-page issue of bare-bones, down-to-earth information includes reviews, resources, idea swap, and short bits.
期刊最新文献
Using Conversation to Promote Language for Comprehension Syntactic Factors in Stuttering Bundle of Learning Chatbots and Neurodivergence Learning to Explain and Generalize
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1