STATE FINANCE AUDIT FOR PEOPLE’S WELFARE (DIALOGUE OF RHETORIC AND REALITY)

Joko Santosa
{"title":"STATE FINANCE AUDIT FOR PEOPLE’S WELFARE (DIALOGUE OF RHETORIC AND REALITY)","authors":"Joko Santosa","doi":"10.20473/jraba.v7i1.36180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study to gain an in-depth understanding of the role of audit for the welfare of the people. Qualitative tradition becomes a paradigm of study by using literature study as its methodology. The results of the analysis and discussion, the discourse is more strategically valuable if it is implemented in efforts to handle and minimize corruption. The argument that states that as a form of audit expectation gap, people's welfare is difficult to realize when corruption is still a serious problem that has not been resolved. The practical contribution of this research is to offer two strategic steps that BPK can take to reduce the existing expectation gap, firstly by improving the quality of financial audits, and secondly by focusing on performance audits with a higher priority on improving the quality of internal auditors' performance (APIP). In the theoretical realm, it can open up opportunities for the development of the concept of auditing in the public sector, not only serving scientific needs but also responding to public expectations.","PeriodicalId":31779,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Bisnis Airlangga","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Bisnis Airlangga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jraba.v7i1.36180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study to gain an in-depth understanding of the role of audit for the welfare of the people. Qualitative tradition becomes a paradigm of study by using literature study as its methodology. The results of the analysis and discussion, the discourse is more strategically valuable if it is implemented in efforts to handle and minimize corruption. The argument that states that as a form of audit expectation gap, people's welfare is difficult to realize when corruption is still a serious problem that has not been resolved. The practical contribution of this research is to offer two strategic steps that BPK can take to reduce the existing expectation gap, firstly by improving the quality of financial audits, and secondly by focusing on performance audits with a higher priority on improving the quality of internal auditors' performance (APIP). In the theoretical realm, it can open up opportunities for the development of the concept of auditing in the public sector, not only serving scientific needs but also responding to public expectations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为人民谋福利的国家财政审计(修辞与现实的对话)
本研究的目的是深入了解审计对人民福利的作用。质性传统以文学研究为方法论,成为一种研究范式。分析和讨论的结果表明,如果话语在处理和减少腐败的努力中得到实施,它将更具战略价值。该论点认为,作为审计期望差距的一种形式,在腐败仍然是一个未得到解决的严重问题的情况下,人民的福利很难实现。本研究的实际贡献是提供了BPK可以采取的两个战略步骤来减少现有的期望差距,首先是通过提高财务审计的质量,其次是通过关注绩效审计,优先考虑提高内部审计师的绩效质量(APIP)。在理论领域,它可以为公共部门审计概念的发展开辟机会,既满足科学需求,又回应公众期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊最新文献
FINANCIAL FRAUD DETECTION AND MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM (UNSUPERVISED LEARNING): SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AUDIT COMMITTEE EFFECTIVENESS AS FRAUD PREVENTION MECHANISMS KETIDAKPASTIAN LINGKUNGAN DAN MANAJEMEN LABA DENGAN KEMAMPUAN MANAJERIAL SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI MACHINE LEARNING FOR E-COMMERCE FRAUD DETECTION THE MODERATING ROLE OF ESG DISCLOSURE ON FIRM STRATEGY AND STOCK PRICE CRASH RISK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1