Assessment of risk-stratified approach to thromboprophylaxis in hip arthroplasty patients: a prospective cohort study

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Current Orthopaedic Practice Pub Date : 2022-11-16 DOI:10.1097/BCO.0000000000001183
A. Bhaskarwar, Narinder Kumar
{"title":"Assessment of risk-stratified approach to thromboprophylaxis in hip arthroplasty patients: a prospective cohort study","authors":"A. Bhaskarwar, Narinder Kumar","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and serious complication in orthopaedic surgeries of the lower limbs. Subsequent pulmonary embolism (PE) makes it the most common cause of death after joint replacement surgeries of the lower limbs. In this study, a multimodal approach for thromboprophylaxis was adopted in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) and hemiarthroplasty (HA), including pharmaceutical and mechanical agents recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) as per risk stratified approach, and the effectiveness of the same was measured by clinical and radiographic assessment. Methods: This was a prospective observational longitudinal study with evaluation at multiple points of time carried out at a tertiary care orthopaedic center. The study included 66 consecutive patients who underwent hip replacement arthroplasty (45 THR, 21 HA). Mechanical and pharmacological (soluble aspirin) prophylaxis modalities for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) were administered to all patients after risk stratification. Patients were assessed for evidence of DVT at 2,6, and 12 wk postoperatively by clinical tests and color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI). Results: This study confirmed efficacy of AAOS recommended risk stratified approach of thromboprophylaxis by combined use of soluble aspirin and various other mechanical measures in patients having standard risk for PE and bleeding undergoing THR or HA because none of the patients developed DVT per clinical assessment and confirmed by CDFI carried out at follow-up. Conclusions: Prevention of DVT as recommended by AAOS has proven to be effective as well as cheaper in moderate-risk patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. Though there were no major differences in complication rates in respect to other prophylaxis except prevalence of major bleeding was very low. Level of Evidence: Level II","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"34 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and serious complication in orthopaedic surgeries of the lower limbs. Subsequent pulmonary embolism (PE) makes it the most common cause of death after joint replacement surgeries of the lower limbs. In this study, a multimodal approach for thromboprophylaxis was adopted in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) and hemiarthroplasty (HA), including pharmaceutical and mechanical agents recommended by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) as per risk stratified approach, and the effectiveness of the same was measured by clinical and radiographic assessment. Methods: This was a prospective observational longitudinal study with evaluation at multiple points of time carried out at a tertiary care orthopaedic center. The study included 66 consecutive patients who underwent hip replacement arthroplasty (45 THR, 21 HA). Mechanical and pharmacological (soluble aspirin) prophylaxis modalities for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) were administered to all patients after risk stratification. Patients were assessed for evidence of DVT at 2,6, and 12 wk postoperatively by clinical tests and color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI). Results: This study confirmed efficacy of AAOS recommended risk stratified approach of thromboprophylaxis by combined use of soluble aspirin and various other mechanical measures in patients having standard risk for PE and bleeding undergoing THR or HA because none of the patients developed DVT per clinical assessment and confirmed by CDFI carried out at follow-up. Conclusions: Prevention of DVT as recommended by AAOS has proven to be effective as well as cheaper in moderate-risk patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. Though there were no major differences in complication rates in respect to other prophylaxis except prevalence of major bleeding was very low. Level of Evidence: Level II
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋关节置换术患者血栓预防风险分层方法的评估:一项前瞻性队列研究
背景:静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是下肢骨科手术中常见且严重的并发症。随后的肺栓塞(PE)使其成为下肢关节置换术后最常见的死亡原因。在本研究中,对接受全髋关节置换术(THR)和半关节成形术(HA)的患者采用了多模式血栓预防方法,包括美国骨科医师学会(AAOS)根据风险分层方法推荐的药物和机械制剂,并通过临床和放射学评估来衡量其有效性。方法:这是一项前瞻性的纵向观察研究,在多个时间点进行评估,在三级护理骨科中心进行。该研究包括66名连续接受髋关节置换术的患者(45 THR,21 HA)。在风险分层后,对所有患者采用机械和药理学(可溶性阿司匹林)预防深静脉血栓形成(DVT)。患者在术后2、6和12周通过临床测试和彩色多普勒血流显像(CDFI)评估DVT的证据。结果:本研究证实了AAOS推荐的风险分层血栓预防方法的有效性,该方法通过联合使用可溶性阿司匹林和各种其他机械措施,对接受THR或HA的PE和出血的标准风险患者进行血栓预防,因为根据临床评估和随访时进行的CDFI证实,没有患者出现DVT。结论:AAOS建议的预防DVT已被证明对接受髋关节置换手术的中危患者有效且便宜。尽管与其他预防措施相比,并发症发生率没有重大差异,但大出血的发生率非常低。证据级别:二级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning review of hand surgery literature Jumpy stump syndrome treated by targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR): a case report and review of the literature Impact of COVID-19 on total hip arthroplasty: results from California state inpatient database Osteotomy via the prone transpsoas approach for lateral interbody fusion of the lumbar spine Orthopaedic surgery residency program ranking and the current state of leadership: what are the characteristics of the leaders in the “Top-tier” programs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1