Critical Indigenous ways of knowing: Research, narratives, and self-actualisation

IF 0.5 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems Pub Date : 2020-12-08 DOI:10.5204/ijcis.v13i1.1636
Estelle Simard
{"title":"Critical Indigenous ways of knowing: Research, narratives, and self-actualisation","authors":"Estelle Simard","doi":"10.5204/ijcis.v13i1.1636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:\nThe process of Indigenous research methodologies has existed within the Anishinaabe worldview for over a millennium. The Anishinaabe-centric author presents and highlights a pathway of Indigenous research methodologies, and critically analyses research, pedagogy and attachment through an Indigenous research methodology. Indigenous research lives within the Anishinaabe language as a cultural process for understanding purpose, in addition to understanding the specific gifts unknown to the researcher. This article identifies Anishinaabe Gikendaasowin as a manner of centring oneself within one’s cultural worldview. Indigenous research methodologies contain intrinsic processes of critical cultural construct development, critical content analysis,ceremony and cultural attachment. This article further explores colonial worldview impacts on Indigenous peoples and the misapplication of that research and its influence on educational paradigms. Finally, an Anishinaabe scholarly exemplar is presented that provides tangible steps for incorporating spirit knowledge into positive, innovative and pedagogical Indigenous lessons.\nIndigenous research sovereignty requires consent when researching our Anishinaabe sacred practice-based evidence. As a result, Indigenous research methodologies will often start with the act of cultural grounding. Cultural grounding in research is not a new concept. In the Anishinaabe language, manidoo waabiwin can translate into seeing things in a spiritual way. This spiritual wayis the bridge to understanding, appreciating and attaching to a construct or phenomenon within an Indigenous way of knowing journey. There are many different manners to grounding one’s spiritual research work that range from offering tobacco to the aatsokaanug (inadequately translated as spirits), and to the participation in cultural activities, both of which will often promote spiritual awareness or manido waabiwin. This critical Indigenous research methodologies article highlights Anishinaabe Gikendaasowin, or Anishinaabe knowledge or ways of knowing that centres within Anishinaabe worldview. This article is embedded in Anishinaabe knowledge and can be considered Anishinaabe-centric.\n ","PeriodicalId":54966,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcis.v13i1.1636","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract: The process of Indigenous research methodologies has existed within the Anishinaabe worldview for over a millennium. The Anishinaabe-centric author presents and highlights a pathway of Indigenous research methodologies, and critically analyses research, pedagogy and attachment through an Indigenous research methodology. Indigenous research lives within the Anishinaabe language as a cultural process for understanding purpose, in addition to understanding the specific gifts unknown to the researcher. This article identifies Anishinaabe Gikendaasowin as a manner of centring oneself within one’s cultural worldview. Indigenous research methodologies contain intrinsic processes of critical cultural construct development, critical content analysis,ceremony and cultural attachment. This article further explores colonial worldview impacts on Indigenous peoples and the misapplication of that research and its influence on educational paradigms. Finally, an Anishinaabe scholarly exemplar is presented that provides tangible steps for incorporating spirit knowledge into positive, innovative and pedagogical Indigenous lessons. Indigenous research sovereignty requires consent when researching our Anishinaabe sacred practice-based evidence. As a result, Indigenous research methodologies will often start with the act of cultural grounding. Cultural grounding in research is not a new concept. In the Anishinaabe language, manidoo waabiwin can translate into seeing things in a spiritual way. This spiritual wayis the bridge to understanding, appreciating and attaching to a construct or phenomenon within an Indigenous way of knowing journey. There are many different manners to grounding one’s spiritual research work that range from offering tobacco to the aatsokaanug (inadequately translated as spirits), and to the participation in cultural activities, both of which will often promote spiritual awareness or manido waabiwin. This critical Indigenous research methodologies article highlights Anishinaabe Gikendaasowin, or Anishinaabe knowledge or ways of knowing that centres within Anishinaabe worldview. This article is embedded in Anishinaabe knowledge and can be considered Anishinaabe-centric.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关键的土著认识方式:研究,叙述和自我实现
摘要:土著研究方法的过程已经在阿尼什纳贝世界观中存在了一千多年。以anishinaabe为中心的作者提出并强调了土著研究方法的途径,并通过土著研究方法批判性地分析了研究,教学法和依恋。土著研究生活在Anishinaabe语言中,作为一种理解目的的文化过程,除了理解研究者未知的具体天赋。这篇文章将“无所畏惧”定义为一种将自己集中在自己的文化世界观中的方式。本土研究方法论包含批判文化建构发展、批判内容分析、仪式与文化依恋的内在过程。本文进一步探讨了殖民世界观对土著人民的影响,以及该研究的误用及其对教育范式的影响。最后,提出了一个Anishinaabe学术范例,为将精神知识纳入积极,创新和教学的土著课程提供了切实可行的步骤。土著研究主权需要在研究我们的anishinaable神圣实践为基础的证据时获得同意。因此,本土研究方法通常会从文化基础开始。研究中的文化基础并不是一个新概念。在Anishinaabe语中,manidoo waabiwin可以翻译成以精神的方式看待事物。这种精神之路是理解、欣赏和依附于土著认知之旅中的一个结构或现象的桥梁。有许多不同的方式来为一个人的精神研究工作奠定基础,从提供烟草到aatsokaanug(不恰当地翻译为精神),以及参与文化活动,这两种方式通常都会促进精神意识或manido waabiwin。这篇批判性的土著研究方法论文章强调了Anishinaabe Gikendaasowin,或Anishinaabe知识或在Anishinaabe世界观中了解它的方法。这篇文章嵌入了Anishinaabe的知识,可以被认为是以Anishinaabe为中心的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems
International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The paradigm for the next generation of information systems (ISs) will involve large numbers of ISs distributed over large, complex computer/communication networks. Such ISs will manage or have access to large amounts of information and computing services and will interoperate as required. These support individual or collaborative human work. Communication among component systems will be done using protocols that range from conventional ones to those based on distributed AI. We call such next generation ISs Cooperative Information Systems (CIS). The International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems (IJCIS) addresses the intricacies of cooperative work in the framework of distributed interoperable information systems. It provides a forum for the presentation and dissemination of research covering all aspects of CIS design, requirements, functionality, implementation, deployment, and evolution.
期刊最新文献
Secured Framework with a Hash Function-Enabled Keyword Search in Cloud Storage Services Edge Computing Security of Mobile Communication System Based on Computer Algorithms CC2530-based wireless data long-distance communication simulation design and application ACSICS: Joint Distribution Mode Integrating Agricultural Industry Chain Logistics Under the Background of Artificial Intelligence IMRCDS: Study on Soft Sensing Model of Multi-component System Concentration Based on Linear Superposition of Single Molecule System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1