An Evaluation of SEC 10-K Charts

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting Pub Date : 2022-02-17 DOI:10.2308/jeta-2021-030
Nathan Garrett
{"title":"An Evaluation of SEC 10-K Charts","authors":"Nathan Garrett","doi":"10.2308/jeta-2021-030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This project measured the effectiveness of charts in SEC 10-K filings. Amazon Mechanical Turk and business students participated in the online experiment. The first half of the study asked participants to interpret five charts rarely found in 10-K filings, including combo charts, scatterplots, stacked bars, relative waterfall charts, and absolute waterfall charts. While participants were successful with combo charts, stacked bars, and absolute waterfalls, half were unable to interpret a scatterplot, and only a handful understood  relative  waterfalls.  The second half of the experiment tested the effects of the three most common design flaws found in 10-K charts. Users were influenced by each of the three flaws: line charts using a non-zero vertical axis, bar charts using an unlabeled non-zero vertical axis, and pie charts using a 3-D perspective. Accounting students should be better trained in deceptive chart designs, and companies should improve their 10-K charts.","PeriodicalId":45427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-2021-030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This project measured the effectiveness of charts in SEC 10-K filings. Amazon Mechanical Turk and business students participated in the online experiment. The first half of the study asked participants to interpret five charts rarely found in 10-K filings, including combo charts, scatterplots, stacked bars, relative waterfall charts, and absolute waterfall charts. While participants were successful with combo charts, stacked bars, and absolute waterfalls, half were unable to interpret a scatterplot, and only a handful understood  relative  waterfalls.  The second half of the experiment tested the effects of the three most common design flaws found in 10-K charts. Users were influenced by each of the three flaws: line charts using a non-zero vertical axis, bar charts using an unlabeled non-zero vertical axis, and pie charts using a 3-D perspective. Accounting students should be better trained in deceptive chart designs, and companies should improve their 10-K charts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SEC 10-K图表的评价
该项目衡量了美国证券交易委员会10-K文件中图表的有效性。亚马逊机械土耳其人和商科学生参加了这项在线实验。研究的前半部分要求参与者解释10-K文件中罕见的五个图表,包括组合图、散点图、堆叠条形图、相对瀑布图和绝对瀑布图。虽然参与者在组合图、堆叠条形图和绝对瀑布方面取得了成功,但有一半的人无法理解散点图,只有少数人理解相对瀑布。实验的后半部分测试了在10-K图表中发现的三个最常见的设计缺陷的影响。用户会受到三个缺陷的影响:使用非零纵轴的折线图、使用未标记非零垂直轴的条形图以及使用三维透视图的饼图。会计专业的学生应该在欺骗性图表设计方面得到更好的培训,公司应该改进他们的10-K图表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
27.80%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Deloitte Canada’s Cocreated ICT Simulation for Advanced Accounting Navigating the Digital Landscape: Unraveling Technological, Organizational, and Environmental Factors Affecting Digital Auditing Readiness in the Malaysian Public Sector A Tableau Teaching Application in Financial Data Analytics to State Local Governments: A Case Study on Louisiana Local Government Large Language Models: An Emerging Technology in Accounting Editorial Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1